Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rob Andrew blames World Cup disaster entirely on Lancaster

Rob Andrew fires shot at Stuart Lancaster

In an extract from Rob Andrew’s book, ‘The Game of My Life: battling for England in the professional era,’ England’s World Cup 2015 coach Stuart Lancaster comes in for some heavy criticism.

ADVERTISEMENT

Andrew, the former RFU Director of Professional Rugby said Lancaster was “losing the plot” in relation to the World Cup, believing he became both “obsessive” and “dictatorial,” especially around his handling of Sam Burgess.

“Stuart Lancaster and (current Ireland defence coach) Andy Farrell have always defended their position on this, but as far as I’m concerned they can say what they like: Burgess was a rogue ingredient in the mix,” says Andrew.

“The Burgess business revealed him at his most obsessive: he was clearly not happy with his options at No 12 and had made up his mind that Sam offered him the nearest thing to a way out, despite the reservations of those who had not seen anything from him at club level with Bath to suggest that he was even remotely up to speed with the realities of midfield play at Test level.”

“We were treated to a slow-motion car crash – a scrambling of the decision-making process, an unravelling of everything we had worked for since that Six Nations camp in Leeds in the cold early weeks of 2012.”

“At that moment, our chances were dust. The valedictory capitulation against the Australians a week later was entirely predictable.”

At a Leinster press conference yesterday Lancaster had the opportunity to respond to Andrew stinging remarks.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I have to say I didn’t see this coming, I wasn’t aware that anything was being written,” said Lancaster.

“Everybody’s entitled to an opinion, Rob has given his and that’s his right I guess.

“You learn a lot about yourself as a national team coach and you learn a lot about other people as well. We’ll leave it at that.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT