Northern | US

All Blacks-Springboks series a battle of slow versus fast

Australia will feel left out after the Springboks and All Blacks announced tours in 2026 and 2030 (Photo PHILL MAGAKOE/ Getty Images)
Comments
3 Comments

Do the Springboks really want to play a fast game?

The answer to that question still has not been provided to us despite evolving their game significantly since 2023.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa have aligned themselves with the northern hemisphere club game, but they like to ‘feel’ like they belong in the southern hemisphere. At some point, the integration with Europe becomes ingrained.

The game speed in the northern hemisphere is slower, despite ball-in-play time being comparable across the leagues. High ball-in-play time doesn’t automatically equal fast.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Down in the south, Super Rugby Pacific has pushed forward with stripping out dead time in a fixture, stricter time limits on scrum setting, and more freedom on quick tap plays, while the officiating style differs drastically to continue the flow of a game.

The teams in Super Rugby Pacific prioritise a lot of high-tempo phase play and deep kicking. You will almost never see a contestable kick plan, rather a long multi-phase attack before a long kick.

Aerial contests are rare in Super Rugby, and as a result you could say that New Zealand, Australian and Pacific players are less experienced and accomplished in this area.

The officiating team for the All Blacks-Springboks series will be slanted towards a northern hemisphere style, with Englishmen Karl Dickson and Matt Carley joining Georgian Nika Amashukeli as three of the four crew. Angus Gardner of Australia is the only referee from the southern hemisphere.

ADVERTISEMENT

If this news has been welcomed by the South Africans, you can understand it.

Carley and Amashukeli officiated during the two biggest Springbok wins over the All Blacks in history, Carley at Twickenham in 2023 and Amashukeli last year in Wellington.

But this would also indicate that the Boks prefer a northern hemisphere game, challenging their identity.

The latest ruck speeds by Opta from the July internationals showed South Africa as the slowest nation of the 12 in the Nations Championship, with a pedestrian 4.23 seconds per ruck.

New Zealand were third at 2.95 seconds, a click behind France (2.93) and Ireland (2.91). When halfback Cam Roigard was on the field, New Zealand had a 2.90-second ruck, which would have placed them first.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although they have fast athletes out wide, South Africa are playing a slow game with the ball, and you can assume they want it officiated that way.

The All Blacks, on the other hand, want the opposite.

Dave Rennie has clearly moved the team back towards a high tempo, higher-risk, attacking side that kicks far less.

They want to play with speed over high phase counts, with fast recycles, fast handling, fast decisions. And they want to do it from anywhere, adopting a far more daring approach than what Scott Robertson had in mind.

When the All Blacks last visited South Africa in 2024, they had regressed towards a conservative version of the game. The 18-12 loss in Cape Town was the perfect example of this uninspiring, low-risk descent. It was an attritional war, a physical and engrossing battle, but one for the purists.

The All Blacks kicked plenty of times and defended for most of the game; they carried 121 times for just four line breaks. The lineouts were a mess on both sides, with the contest defined by success in the air. New Zealand had a field day at the breakdown, winning 10 turnovers.

The All Blacks settled for threes to build a 9-3 lead, only to watch it evaporate from one converted Springbok try.

They failed to score a single try in their efforts. The irony was that they were playing more like the Springboks did from 2019-2023, and couldn’t beat South Africa at their own game.

In the process, they forgot about the natural advantages of New Zealand players and what makes the All Blacks the All Blacks.

The blueprint to success in South Africa was clear in 2022 at Ellis Park under former head coach Ian Foster.

Foster has seen a lot of Tests in South Africa under Hansen, and came away with Test wins in 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018.

In 2022, he stuck with the same game plan after losing in Mbombela and backed the team to execute. They did, putting up a 35-23 victory that became the catalyst for a turnaround and World Cup run.

Robertson ignored that blueprint and tried to beat the South Africans at their own game, which backfired with two losses from two attempts, despite holding the lead in both games at the half.

Now the current narrative is that the Springboks have become a powerhouse attacking team. They are scoring a lot of points and averaging six tries a Test. This doesn’t mean they are a powerhouse ball-in-hand team.

While it is true that the Springboks have evolved under Tony Brown, becoming more enterprising with a host of brilliant outside backs, there is a balance, and they haven’t strayed too far away from their natural strengths.

The prime example of this is the Wellington Test in 2025 with a final quarter surge to blow away the All Blacks 43-10.

It was a chaotic game where the Boks bested the All Blacks in many areas, including a willingness to counter-attack that night.

In the first 20 minutes, South Africa completely dominated possession and territory but with little reward. They tested the All Blacks frequently playing a wide-wide game, but didn’t actually profit with any tries.

New Zealand countered in the last 20 minutes of the first half to finish with a 10-7 half-time lead, countering with a wide-wide attack pattern of their own.

Despite plenty of promise with ball-in-hand, South Africa’s only try of the first half was a runaway intercept to Kolbe.

Now the interesting part about the landslide second half is that once they had built a lead from Kolbe’s second try, a well-scored team effort from a power-packed set-piece launch, the Springboks reverted to a kick-pressure, set-piece game.

Cobus Reinach hoisted box kicks, Mannie Libbok punched bombs into the sky, and the ensuing scrums from lost balls became penalty machines for South Africa to piggyback downfield.

They kept their grip on the game that way, and once they were in good attacking zones, played with the ball more. But they did not attempt to run all over the All Blacks the same way as the first 20 minutes. That was temporary.

The Boks’ record margin victory didn’t come by beating the All Blacks at their own running game. It was a pretty standard formula from South Africa, and credit to them it worked that night.

Dave Rennie has revived the attacking identity of the All Blacks, and they will come with the intent to hold the ball and attack.

The Boks are still the same and, by all indications, want to go to the air, control the set-piece and slow the game down with ball in hand.

This is what will decide the series: who can control the tempo. Because if the All Blacks do that, they will win.

Register your interest to receive priority updates on RWC27 ticket releases. Don't miss out, stay in the loop!


ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
H
Hammer Head 17 mins ago

Slow, fast, identity or not.


Check the scoreboard.

Q
Quincy79 1 hr ago

I think Ben Smith’s article asks the wrong question. The real question isn’t whether the Springboks want to play a fast game; it’s whether they’re smart enough to know when not to.


Apparently, according to Ben, if you don’t recycle the ball in 2.9 seconds and play 17 phases before kicking, you’re not truly playing attacking rugby. By that logic, the quickest team should win every tournament and we can replace coaches with stopwatches.


The article keeps treating tempo as if it’s a moral virtue. New Zealand play fast, therefore they are progressive. South Africa kick more, contest more, and use the set-piece more, therefore they’re secretly northern hemisphere rugby in a green jersey. That’s a fascinating identity crisis to discover in a team that has spent the last few years collecting World Cups and Rugby Championship titles.


The best part is the Wellington example. Ben spends paragraphs explaining that South Africa eventually reverted to kick pressure, bombs, scrums and territorial control… and then reminds us they won 43–10. So the evidence that the Springbok formula is flawed is a match they won by 33 points.


And the ending is spectacular. “If the All Blacks control the tempo, they will win.” Of course. And if the Springboks control the set-piece, territory, aerial battle and scoring efficiency, they’ll win.


One of those is a prediction. The other is basically the last five years of results.

H
Hammer Head 16 mins ago

Exactly. In the end, check the scoreboard.


New Zealand is welcome to lose fast, if they so wish.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NoLongerARuck 32 minutes ago
The data shows Dave Rennie's All Blacks can test the all-conquering Springboks to the max

I think many writers talk about the way the game should be played and the problems with playing this way or that and are very biased in one way or the other. Many pundits clearly have agendas like Ben Smith (All Blacks biased and Bok Bashing), Jake White ( pro South Africa but also biased in terms of his own coaching experience) and TV pundits like Matt Williams, Jeff Wilson, Nick Mallett, Schalk Burger or even the Stan Sport crew. I would say that NB is clearly an example of a writer who may have his own opinions but who does not let that get in the way of the facts. He presents them methodically and scientifically and leaves his own preferences for the game out of the equation. He presents arguments for and against and lets us decide for ourselves in the comments section. This is quality jounalism at its best which presents an unrivalled deep dive statistical rugby analysis from a professional analyst that you are unlikely to find anywhere else. When you add the level of engagement the writer endeavours to provide then it becomes quickly apparent that this man is a treasure to rugby fans on this site and rightfully so. I truly do not see the anti bok narrative some fans see, not when the writer presents facts about why the AB’s could challenge the Boks and why the Boks could remain on top after the encounter by explaining where they are strong. Two sides of the arguments presented, we draw our own conclusions. The facts explained, both sides of the argument explored, it sounds like unbiased writing to me.

461 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close