Northern | US

All Blacks-Springboks series a battle of slow versus fast

Australia will feel left out after the Springboks and All Blacks announced tours in 2026 and 2030 (Photo PHILL MAGAKOE/ Getty Images)
Comments
100 Comments

Do the Springboks really want to play a fast game?

The answer to that question still has not been provided to us despite evolving their game significantly since 2023.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa have aligned themselves with the northern hemisphere club game, but they like to ‘feel’ like they belong in the southern hemisphere. At some point, the integration with Europe becomes ingrained.

The game speed in the northern hemisphere is slower, despite ball-in-play time being comparable across the leagues. High ball-in-play time doesn’t automatically equal fast.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Down in the south, Super Rugby Pacific has pushed forward with stripping out dead time in a fixture, stricter time limits on scrum setting, and more freedom on quick tap plays, while the officiating style differs drastically to continue the flow of a game.

The teams in Super Rugby Pacific prioritise a lot of high-tempo phase play and deep kicking. You will almost never see a contestable kick plan, rather a long multi-phase attack before a long kick.

Aerial contests are rare in Super Rugby, and as a result you could say that New Zealand, Australian and Pacific players are less experienced and accomplished in this area.

The officiating team for the All Blacks-Springboks series will be slanted towards a northern hemisphere style, with Englishmen Karl Dickson and Matt Carley joining Georgian Nika Amashukeli as three of the four crew. Angus Gardner of Australia is the only referee from the southern hemisphere.

ADVERTISEMENT

If this news has been welcomed by the South Africans, you can understand it.

Carley and Amashukeli officiated during the two biggest Springbok wins over the All Blacks in history, Carley at Twickenham in 2023 and Amashukeli last year in Wellington.

But this would also indicate that the Boks prefer a northern hemisphere game, challenging their identity.

The latest ruck speeds by Opta from the July internationals showed South Africa as the slowest nation of the 12 in the Nations Championship, with a pedestrian 4.23 seconds per ruck.

New Zealand were third at 2.95 seconds, a click behind France (2.93) and Ireland (2.91). When halfback Cam Roigard was on the field, New Zealand had a 2.90-second ruck, which would have placed them first.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although they have fast athletes out wide, South Africa are playing a slow game with the ball, and you can assume they want it officiated that way.

The All Blacks, on the other hand, want the opposite.

Dave Rennie has clearly moved the team back towards a high tempo, higher-risk, attacking side that kicks far less.

They want to play with speed over high phase counts, with fast recycles, fast handling, fast decisions. And they want to do it from anywhere, adopting a far more daring approach than what Scott Robertson had in mind.

When the All Blacks last visited South Africa in 2024, they had regressed towards a conservative version of the game. The 18-12 loss in Cape Town was the perfect example of this uninspiring, low-risk descent. It was an attritional war, a physical and engrossing battle, but one for the purists.

The All Blacks kicked plenty of times and defended for most of the game; they carried 121 times for just four line breaks. The lineouts were a mess on both sides, with the contest defined by success in the air. New Zealand had a field day at the breakdown, winning 10 turnovers.

The All Blacks settled for threes to build a 9-3 lead, only to watch it evaporate from one converted Springbok try.

They failed to score a single try in their efforts. The irony was that they were playing more like the Springboks did from 2019-2023, and couldn’t beat South Africa at their own game.

In the process, they forgot about the natural advantages of New Zealand players and what makes the All Blacks the All Blacks.

The blueprint to success in South Africa was clear in 2022 at Ellis Park under former head coach Ian Foster.

Foster has seen a lot of Tests in South Africa under Hansen, and came away with Test wins in 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018.

In 2022, he stuck with the same game plan after losing in Mbombela and backed the team to execute. They did, putting up a 35-23 victory that became the catalyst for a turnaround and World Cup run.

Robertson ignored that blueprint and tried to beat the South Africans at their own game, which backfired with two losses from two attempts, despite holding the lead in both games at the half.

Now the current narrative is that the Springboks have become a powerhouse attacking team. They are scoring a lot of points and averaging six tries a Test. This doesn’t mean they are a powerhouse ball-in-hand team.

While it is true that the Springboks have evolved under Tony Brown, becoming more enterprising with a host of brilliant outside backs, there is a balance, and they haven’t strayed too far away from their natural strengths.

The prime example of this is the Wellington Test in 2025 with a final quarter surge to blow away the All Blacks 43-10.

It was a chaotic game where the Boks bested the All Blacks in many areas, including a willingness to counter-attack that night.

In the first 20 minutes, South Africa completely dominated possession and territory but with little reward. They tested the All Blacks frequently playing a wide-wide game, but didn’t actually profit with any tries.

New Zealand countered in the last 20 minutes of the first half to finish with a 10-7 half-time lead, countering with a wide-wide attack pattern of their own.

Despite plenty of promise with ball-in-hand, South Africa’s only try of the first half was a runaway intercept to Kolbe.

Now the interesting part about the landslide second half is that once they had built a lead from Kolbe’s second try, a well-scored team effort from a power-packed set-piece launch, the Springboks reverted to a kick-pressure, set-piece game.

Cobus Reinach hoisted box kicks, Mannie Libbok punched bombs into the sky, and the ensuing scrums from lost balls became penalty machines for South Africa to piggyback downfield.

They kept their grip on the game that way, and once they were in good attacking zones, played with the ball more. But they did not attempt to run all over the All Blacks the same way as the first 20 minutes. That was temporary.

The Boks’ record margin victory didn’t come by beating the All Blacks at their own running game. It was a pretty standard formula from South Africa, and credit to them it worked that night.

Dave Rennie has revived the attacking identity of the All Blacks, and they will come with the intent to hold the ball and attack.

The Boks are still the same and, by all indications, want to go to the air, control the set-piece and slow the game down with ball in hand.

This is what will decide the series: who can control the tempo. Because if the All Blacks do that, they will win.

Register your interest to receive priority updates on RWC27 ticket releases. Don't miss out, stay in the loop!


ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

100 Comments
T
TW 44 days ago

Remind me to stop reading Ben Smith’s rubbish

J
JW 44 days ago

The Boks’ record margin victory didn’t come by beating the All Blacks at their own running game

In a way it was. The great AB sides largely achieved their records by merely holding on for large parts of games simply to blitz the opposition from a short period of intent and execution.


In that respect it was exactly the type of game you’re outlining the Boks as wanting to play (where in the ABs case you would more have called these luls holding on, until the opponent tires and gives an opening).

B
Blackmania 44 days ago

What fascinates me is just how confident the Boks supporters have become. They seem to think their team has become unbeatable. The Boks control everything, and all they have to do is replicate what happened in Wellington in 2025.

Let’s just let the games play out and see what happens. I believe Rennie and his coaching staff are extremely capable, and I think the All Blacks will give the Boks a really tough challenge.

H
Hammer Head 44 days ago

What fascinates me is how fascinated you are that Bok supporters have become as confident as All Black supporters. You guys still act as if your team is unbeatable…


Let’s just let the games play out and see what happens. I believe Rassie and his coaching staff are extremely capable, and I think the Boks will give the All Blacks a really tough challenge.

u
unknown 45 days ago

Yawn 😶

j
jH 45 days ago

It’s not ruck speed etc, it is how many boot laces need tieing. How many props have a niggly knee etc

P
PB 45 days ago

Ah that old yarn! Hate to break it you lass, but you missed about two years of Bok rugby. Boks are generally fitter and can maintain the intensity they play at.

P
PM 45 days ago

Its pretty stupid to not practice how to catch high balls in a game. Especially since the All Blacks know that aerial bombs are coming. At the end of the day each team plays to their own strengths and whoever executes their game plan better on the day wins the game

R
RS 45 days ago

So ruck speed is apparently the marker of hiw quickly a team plays, and apparently the south is so much faster than the south… except that both France and Ireland had faster ruck speed than New Zealand. Interesting theory, makes sense

J
JW 44 days ago

And England

N
NoLongerARuck 45 days ago

The officiating team for the All Blacks-Springboks series will be slanted towards a northern hemisphere style, with Englishmen Karl Dickson and Matt Carley joining Georgian Nika Amashukeli as three of the four crew. Angus Gardner of Australia is the only referee from the southern hemisphere

Carley and Dickson will reward fast enterprising play. The prem ball in play is the best in the world right now and they are prem refs. Amashukeli loves an open game and contest as well Gardner is a top ref, very pragmatic and clear communicator. To be honest the refs will have very little to do with this series outcome, they are all seasoned officials.

N
NoLongerARuck 45 days ago

I think the Springboks are very pragmatic. They aren’t big ruck builders and they try to utilise possession positively rather than keeping the ball for the sake of it. They have an excellent strike rate and get to the try line with fewer carries and rucks than any team on the circuit. Thats efficiency. They do love a contestable kick and their scrum is an absolute weapon. When they get into the 22 they play with pace and urgency that overwhelms defences so they have that in their locker. In their own half they slow it down and go to the contestable. At scrum they set for penalties, off turnover they look to spread the ball and bust the line for quick scores using their backs. They are the hardest team to play against because they can hit you from everywhere and play at any speed depending on where they are on the field. They can slug it out in the forwards and win with brute force, they can nail your set piece and win, they can win the game out wide with their fast backs, they can mess up your ruck speed and turnover the ball and play off turnover and win. They can win using the contestables and their defence, physicality and line speed is a weapon that can win them games in itself. South Africa are the best team right now not because they are slow and methodical, its because they have the best-rounded game of any team right now and thats what makes them so hard to beat.

c
cnw 43 days ago

Astute analysis. One important qualification needed. The Boks system has not been seriously tested - Argentina, France and Scotland got close but fell short. The ABs are not there yet, but if the ABs can maintain the level of pressure and intensity they have shown in the first three NC games, that true test may not be far away.

J
JW 44 days ago

rather than keeping the ball for the sake of it

Who does that?

J
Jacque 45 days ago

If you think this oak writes a load of KAK on this site, check out his twitter. chief propagandist media hack.

J
Jacque 45 days ago

The Boks’ record margin victory didn’t come by beating the All Blacks at their own running game. It was a pretty standard formula from South Africa, and credit to them it worked that night


& WE WILL USE IT AGAIN AGAIN & AGAIN & AGAIN to beat you INTO GROUND.

c
cnw 45 days ago

Ha ha - 🤣 - tell me how did that standard formula go last year at Ellis Park?

B
Boddasaffa 45 days ago

On every chat there is a massive contingent of AB pundits predicting how the AB’s will beat the Boks.

The SA contingent are just smiling requesting the time to kickoff come quicker, hopefully it will put all the pundits back in the shadows where they came from.

Whatever the score is, it will be a fantastic series. That’s all that really matters - Boks 3-1 fast or slowly beating the AB’s

H
Hammer Head 43 days ago

Indeed. Yet no Rugbypass articles declaring AB fans insufferable twonks.


I can draft one for them if they wish.

B
Bazzallina 45 days ago

What do you expect fans to do ? The cup has always gotta be half full ..believe me all

kiwis know Boks are the biz atm but those predictions you should read them more as a this is a way we can do it stuff more than a def we will

N
NoLongerARuck 45 days ago

Would not be surprised if the All Blacks won at Ellis Park and if the series was shared 2-2. The Boks are not exactly playing fluently right now and with alot of players coming back from injury they might not be at their best. Would be better if they had one or 2 more tests before this tour and remember the Boks have to still beat Argentina first

H
HS 45 days ago

If the defence is stronger and tackles are made behind the gain line, if contests for the ball after a tackle increase and/or double tackles come is, ruck speed is going to slow on average.


With a lot of kicks of 9 it is expected that ruck speed is slower as the 9 has 5 seconds after the ref calls ‘use it’.


To me a scrum contest and the physical contest are a major part of the attraction of rugby; I don't see the benefit of taking this out of the game and ending up with a combination of 7s, league and touch rugby.


In the end, no one will bother about ruck speed, passes, or other metrics after the game - everyone will remember who won.

J
JW 44 days ago

If the defence is stronger and tackles are made behind the gain line, if contests for the ball after a tackle increase and/or double tackles come is, ruck speed is going to slow on average.

Are you saying that South Africa had three opposition in the NC that where big brutes that defended like hounds and loved getting stuck into ruck defence slowing your ball down?

J
J Marc 45 days ago

If the opponents side is allowed to hear 4 times “ release” from the ref before removing hands, the ruck speed slow a bit too…

W
Wayneo 45 days ago

It looks like the SBs deliberate slower ruck speed tactical trap has caught more than just their oppositions defensive lines…

 

The SBs won’t allow the ABs to control the tempo during this series.

 

The SBs game is intrinsically designed to deny the opposition any control over the rhythm of the match.

 

Yes, the ABs 2.95-second breakdown speed looks lightning-fast next to SBs 4.23 seconds.

 

But the SBs slower speed is deliberate.

 

Look closer at their rucks, the Boks deliberately freeze the ball at the base for an extra second or two.

 

They aren't stuck or slow, they are forcing opposition defenders to plant their feet, become static, and over-commit to the inside channels.

 

That delay is a tactical illusion.

 

It disrupts the defensive rhythm and creates the exact structural disconnects that the SBs Totalball system thrives on.

 

The result?

 

The SBs are now slicing through defensive lines faster than anyone else in the world, doing it across fewer, more lethal phases than the ABs exhausting 15-to-20 phase marathons.

 

If you use a stopwatch on how quickly the ball travels from the breakdown, through the hands of the SBs forwards and into the wide channels, you will realize very quickly there is nothing slow about it.

 

Under Dave Rennie and Mike Blair, the ABs rely on a frantic, high-phase blueprint designed to outwork defenses.

 

Watching it is like watching a bunch of squirrels running around hyped up on sugar and caffeine, exhausting to play against, but equally exhausting to sustain.

 

It is a high-risk blueprint that demands flawless handling under immense fatigue.

 

Against the SBs, that fatigue will be compounded by relentless, suffocating physical pressure.

 

And then, the Bomb Squad arrives for the final 30 minutes…!

 

We saw the blueprint clearly in Wellington.

 

The SBs expansive wide-wide game systematically wore the ABs down for the first hour.

 

Once the fatigue set in, the SBs unleashed a ruthless aerial bombardment.

 

Combined with the constant threat of the running game, it completely unraveled the ABs defense, leaving massive, unprotected real estate in the backfield for Manie Libbok and Cobus Reinach to ruthlessly exploit via the boot.


Folks, you always have to remember there are two teams on the pitch and both will get oportunities withthe ball in hand.

J
JW 44 days ago

Under Dave Rennie and Mike Blair, the ABs rely on a frantic, high-phase blueprint designed to outwork defenses.

Exact opposite. They are still using the previous attack that draws the defence in just like described how the boks do, just a different way obviously.

c
cnw 45 days ago

The issue is not about slow v fast but about pressure and fatigue. Scotland pressurised the Bok defensive systems with their all of field attack. And perhaps what is most significant is that their four tries were scored when the Boks were fatigued - end of the first and second halves. The ABs will bring an order of magnitude greater pressure. Will it be enough? We’ll see.

S
SL 45 days ago

For me, even though they are yet to win a World Cup, France are the complete rugby team who can play both styles with ease and are a joy to watch. SA are very close to replicating this. Personally, I eagerly anticipate these two team’s fixtures because I want to watch them, they excite me, maybe for different reasons, France with that free flowing attack and SA with that sheer direct power. They are the best two teams in the world right now, despite what rankings say.

NZ don’t excite me anymore. They are, dare I say, totally predictable. Yes, they play a quick ruck game but they don’t really penetrate defences and then you get that long kick downfield. I think Rassie enjoys this because he can plan it easily. So do France, because they will just have a go.

While I do think there is a pecking order in Wold Rugby where SA, NZ and France are now clearly ahead of the rest, NZ are only there because of a few individuals and their team as a whole, is not quite at the level of the other two.

Looking forward to the series and I think it will be 3-1 to SA.

J
JW 44 days ago

Yeah NZ is the biggest schmozzle at the moment, only two of their players are locked in starters next year imo.

O
Over the sideline 45 days ago

Yeah NZ has been so lucky to beat France constantly eh. Imagine the record of NZ was actually any good instead of just lucky.

J
J Marc 45 days ago

Aa a french, I think France is far too weak at scrum time to be a real threet for SA.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Slow, fast, identity or not.


Check the scoreboard.

J
Jordon 44 days ago

Which one? ABs still hover around the 60% win mark vs SA. Even in the world cup era we’ve still beaten you guys twice as many times as you’ve beaten us.

J
JW 44 days ago

You’re learning for today HH is why bother waiting, when you can check the referee appointments now?

S
SC 44 days ago

The scoreboard was 1 win, 1 loss each last season against a very mediocre All Blacks.

B
Bazzallina 45 days ago

Agree HH …besides Boks will still speed up the ruck up if they smell blood in the water

Q
Quincy79 45 days ago

I think Ben Smith’s article asks the wrong question. The real question isn’t whether the Springboks want to play a fast game; it’s whether they’re smart enough to know when not to.


Apparently, according to Ben, if you don’t recycle the ball in 2.9 seconds and play 17 phases before kicking, you’re not truly playing attacking rugby. By that logic, the quickest team should win every tournament and we can replace coaches with stopwatches.


The article keeps treating tempo as if it’s a moral virtue. New Zealand play fast, therefore they are progressive. South Africa kick more, contest more, and use the set-piece more, therefore they’re secretly northern hemisphere rugby in a green jersey. That’s a fascinating identity crisis to discover in a team that has spent the last few years collecting World Cups and Rugby Championship titles.


The best part is the Wellington example. Ben spends paragraphs explaining that South Africa eventually reverted to kick pressure, bombs, scrums and territorial control… and then reminds us they won 43–10. So the evidence that the Springbok formula is flawed is a match they won by 33 points.


And the ending is spectacular. “If the All Blacks control the tempo, they will win.” Of course. And if the Springboks control the set-piece, territory, aerial battle and scoring efficiency, they’ll win.


One of those is a prediction. The other is basically the last five years of results.

J
JW 44 days ago

and we can replace coaches with stopwatches.

That’s pretty much how every winning franchise and idea is built. It’s not on the back of the individuals, its on the practices they employ (read adopted).

c
cnw 44 days ago

True but the exceptions make his point Q. Lose control of the pace of the game = 33 and 38 unanswered points.

P
PB 44 days ago

That is Benny Hill for you. He phrased it like that for a reason, to troll 🧌

No other reason.

B
Bazzallina 45 days ago

I have to say Q was a lil surprised the Boks kicked so many contestables in NC would have thought they have that game on lockdown instant recall so we might have seen some more other “stuff” especially against Wales .

Not saying that they shouldn’t do that against ABs history shows that they should but imo that game and the others to an extent I think they maybe missed an opportunity to run some other styles from the playbook of plans B and C

S
SM 45 days ago

Well said.


A big difference is that Rennie has a limited amount of time, so has to essentially go all in on one game plan and he will also be limited in his ability to adjust from test to test.


Whereas this WC cycle the boks coaches have bedded in a handful of different “modes” they can go to and switch to within the space of a match.


Smith is right, they aren’t going to play Tonyball all tour. They would be foolish too when they can beat us in 2-3 different ways and have done with regularity. But to think they won’t attack us with ball in hand at all is foolish.

L
Lou Cifer 45 days ago

One of those is a prediction. The other is basically the last five years of results

🤐😎

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Exactly. In the end, check the scoreboard.


New Zealand is welcome to lose fast, if they so wish.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close