Ali Williams: We need to support our referees
77-Test All Black Ali Williams gives his take on today’s referees and how we can support them moving forward in his exclusive RugbyPass column.
We’ve all got our views on the June Test series. Is it beneficial for teams and players? Does the timing work? Is it financially viable? These are all questions that we find ourselves constantly asking after the June series.
We’ve also all got our own views on the referees, with plenty of tough calls being made over the break that could have gone either way.
Let’s look at it in terms of the referee’s position. I personally would ask the question, are we genuinely giving enough support and encouragement to the referees?
From a players’ – or ex-players’ – point of view, I personally don’t think that we have given the referees enough support as the game has moved into the professional era. I think that there are a few paths that we can potentially go down from here in order to better provide that support.
Firstly, we can take a big step back and just let the officials referee what they see, let them understand the game and its momentum. Or, we can go down the same route the likes of cricket, tennis and sailing have gone down, where it’s all about artificial intelligence.
The technology is out there where the referees should literally be able to – in any scenario of the game – take angles and data to say ‘yes, he did tackle him high’ or ‘yes, he did take him off the ground’, as seen with the bowling lines and predictive technology in cricket. Are we able to bring that into the game? If we bring that into the game I don’t have an issue with it. It would be full and final and it would give the referees the support they need.
Upon implementing that, you’re going to attract more referees into the game and that is where they can really focus on the element of protecting kids and making the game safer, which to me is great and I support that angle.
However, I think we’ve also got to weigh up whether we go the other way and just say hold on, we want to keep up with tradition in rugby. The referee’s decision remains final and we accept that he’s going to make some mistakes. He’s going to get some things right and might get a few things wrong or interpret some things differently, but that’s what he sees and at the end of the day, he’s the one with the whistle in his hand.
Of the current crop of referees, I think the guy that handles the game the best is Nigel Owens. Purely because he feels and understands the players’ positions because he has made himself vulnerable in his own personal position.
Before Owens, the guy that really resonated with me was Paddy O’Brien. He understood what was at stake in any given game. Whether it was a Ranfurly Shield challenge, if it was an All Black trial, or if it was an All Blacks Test, he knew what to expect in every scenario and how to handle the heated moments.
I personally would like to know how referees are mandated by World Rugby. As with any job, you are given a certain level of authority. At times it can be tough to determine where that authority lies with our referees.
Are World Rugby asking referees to aid the growth strategy of the game by reffing our game in a manner that will help grow kids’ rugby, grow rugby around the world, and break down some of those barriers to entry around the physical side of the game?
If so, that’s fine, and you can potentially see refereeing heading down that track with where the high tackle law is going, and where punishment for aerial play has gone. It’s clear that we are now geared more towards player safety above all else.
As we have seen over the past few weeks, the stance has been that if someone is in the air, they are vulnerable and we don’t want you to touch them because it can end in disaster.
At present I think it’s actually our referees that are too vulnerable. There’s too much ability for a team, a coach, or a player to come out and say that the ref got it right or wrong.
This would almost be erased if the predictive technology was developed to aid the referee in his decision making.
Take the forward pass rule for example. At this stage, they should literally have a line that shoots out showing the path of the ball. Yes or no. It’s standard, you’ve got your angles and that is it. There are no more questions about it. Media then don’t have to drum up stuff around decisions.
We need to escape the in-between we are stuck in with modern refereeing.
All we are doing right now is making it hard for referees to want to do their jobs.
In other news:
Comments on RugbyPass
The rugby championship would be even stronger with Fiji in it… I know it doesen’t fit the long term plans of NZ or Aus but you are robbing a whole nation of being able to see their best players play for Fiji…. Every second player in NZ and AUS teams has Fijian surnames… shame on you!!! World rugby won’t step in either as France and England has now also joined in…. I guess where money is involved it will always be the poor countries missing out….
65 Go to commentsNo surprise there. How hard can it be to pick a ball off the ground and chuck it to a mate? 😂
2 Go to commentsSometimes people just like a moan mate!
1 Go to commentsexcellent idea ! rugby needs this 💪
9 Go to comments9 Brumbies! What a joke! The best performing team in Oz! Ditch Skelton for Swain or Neville. Ryan Lonergan ahead of McDermott any day! Best selection bolter is Toole … amazing player
12 Go to commentsI like this, but ultimately rugby already has enough trophies. Trying to make more games “consequential" might prove to be a fools errand, although this is a less bad idea than some others. Minor quibble with the title of the article; it isn’t very meaningful to say the boks are the unofficial world champions when it would be functionally impossible for the Raeburn trophy not to be held by the world champions. There’s a period of a few months every 4 years when there is no “unofficial” world champion, and the Raeburn trophy is held by the actual world champions.
9 Go to commentsIts a great idea but one that I dont think will have a lot of traction. It will depend on the prestige that they each hold but if you can do that it would be great. When Japan beat the Boks (my team) I was absolutely devestated but I wont deny the great game they played that day. We were outclassed and it was one of the best games of rugby I have seen. Using an idea like this you might just give the the underdog teams more of an opportunity to beat the big teams and I can absolutely see it being a brilliant display of rugby. They beat us because they planned for that game. It was a great moment for Japan. This way we can remove the 4 year wait and give teams something to aim for outside of World Cup years.
9 Go to commentsHi, Dave here. Happy to answer questions 🥰
9 Go to commentsDon’t think that headline is accurate. It’s great to see Aus doing better but I’m not sure they’ve shown much threat to the top of the table. They shouldn’t be inflating wins against the lousy Highlanders and Crusaders either.
3 Go to commentsSuch a shame Roigard and Aumua picked up long term injuries, probably the two form players in the comp. Also, pretty sure Clarke Dermody isn’t their coach. Got it half right though.
3 Go to commentsOh the Aussie media, they never learn. At least Andrew Kellaway is like “Woah, yeah it’s great, but settle down there guys” having endured years of the Aussie media, fans, and often their players getting ahead of themselves only to fall flat on their faces. Have the “We'll win the Bledisloe for sure this year!” headlines started yet? It’s simple to see what’s going on. The Aussie teams are settled, they didn't lose any of their major players overseas. The Crusaders and Chiefs lost key experienced All Blacks, and Razor in the Crusaders case, and clearly neither are anywhere near as strong as last year (The Canes and Blues would probably be 3rd & 4th if they were). The Highlanders are annually average, even more so post-Aaron Smith and a big squad clean out. The two teams at the top? The two nz sides with largely the same settled roster as last year, except Ardie Savea for the Canes. They’ve both got far better coaches now too. If the Aussies are going to win the title, this is the year the kiwi sides will be weakest, so they better take their chance.
3 Go to commentsThe World Cup has to be the gold standard, line in the sand. 113 teams compete for what is the opportunity to make the pool stages, and then the knockout games for the trophy. The concept is sound. This must have been the rationale when the World Cup was created, surely? But I’m all for Looking forward and finding new ways for the SH to dominate the NH into the future. The autumn series needs a change up. Let’s start by having the NH teams come south every odd year for the Autumn/Spring series games?
9 Go to commentsWhat’ll happen when the AI models of the future go back in time and try to destroy the AI models of the past standing in their way of certain victory?
41 Go to commentsThanks, Nick. We (Seanny Maloney, Brett and I) just discussed Charlie as a potential Wallaby No 8, and wondered if he has truly realised how big he is in contact (and whether he can add 5 kg w/o slowing down). Your scouting report confirms our suspicions he has the materiel. No one knows if he has the mentality (as Johann van Graan said this week about CJ, Duane and Alfie B) to carry 10-15 times a game.
57 Go to commentsHe would be a great player for the Stormers, Dobbo should approach the guy.
3 Go to commentsGood article. A few years back when he was playing for the Cheetahs, he was a quiet standout for exactly the seasons stated here. I occasionally get to see his games in the UK, and he has become a more complete player and in many ways like an Irish player. His work ethic is so suitable to the Leinster game. I wonder if Rassie would have him listed somewhere.
3 Go to commentsResults probably skewed by the fact that a few clubs have foreign fly halves in their 30s, but most teams have young English scrum halves. Results also likely to be skewed by the fact that many teams rely on centres and fullbacks to provide depth at 10, whereas they will need to stock a large number of specialist backup 9s.
2 Go to commentsI really get the sense that when all is said and done, the path of least resistance will end up being a merger of Wasps & Worcester that essentially kills the Worcester Warriors brand and sees Wasps permanently playing at Sixways. I’m not saying that’s what should happen or what I want to happen. I just think it’s the easiest rout to take and therefore, will be what happens. Wasps will definitely return to play first, and I suppose it all depends on if they can find support at Sixways. If people turn up and support Wasps in that community, at that ground, I bet they drop the Sevenoaks plan and just remain at Sixways. Under the radar but not totally unrelated, it looks as though London Irish are going to be brought back from the dead by a German consortium and look set to return, likely to the remade Championship. It’s set to have 12 clubs next season with 14 in 2025/26, what do you want to bet those extra 2 are Wasps and London Irish?
3 Go to commentsThe shoulder is a “joint” with multiple bones. You don’t “fracture” a shoulder, you fracture any one or more of the bones that make up a shoulder.
2 Go to commentsOh dear, bones too suspect to continue?
2 Go to comments