Northern | US

The five moments that cost the All Blacks in Soweto


New Zealand's wing Will Jordan tackles South Africa's number eight Jasper Wiese during the third Rugby's Greatest Rivalry international rugby union match between South Africa and New Zealand at the FNB Stadium in Johannesburg, on September 5, 2026. (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE / AFP via Getty Images)
Comments
83 Comments

The All Blacks had plenty of chances in the third Test in South Africa to claim a historic 2-1 result on South African soil.

ADVERTISEMENT

After going up by 12-5 in the first half and 17-12 in the second half, the game was for the taking but a number of key opportunities lost didn’t build the required buffer on the scoreboard.

Dave Rennie’s side continually turn one error into a handful, leading to huge momentum swings against them. Their inability to effectively win restarts was a huge issue in this series.

Video Spacer

Sam Darry on All Blacks’ plan to stop Boks’ maul

Video Spacer

Sam Darry on All Blacks’ plan to stop Boks’ maul

Here are five big moments that cost the All Blacks in the 29-24 loss to the Springboks in the third Test.

Tupou Vaa’i’s big miss – 14th minute

The towering lock had a golden opportunity to make South Africa pay after the All Blacks forced a goal line restart following a brilliant kick by Leroy Carter down the left hand touchline.

The All Blacks had scored through Ardie Savea first with a 7-0 advantage at the time, and Vaa’i had the chance to make that 12-0 and potentially 14-0.

The shallow restart was not taken by South Africa, with Vaa’i getting two hands to the ball. The Springboks players overran the catch point, leaving Vaa’i with an open line 15 metres out.

ADVERTISEMENT

Vaa’i had Peter Lakai right on his inside shoulder and the pair may have faced a cover tackle from Cobus Reinach, however, Vaa’i has enough power and speed to win that match up.

He dropped it cold, his second failed restart recovery off the game. An earlier kick off had been contested and resulted in a scrum to New Zealand.

The worst part is from the ensuing scrum South Africa won a penalty for an easy exit, which was followed by another penalty conceded by Ardie Savea counter-rucking from the side, followed by another penalty on a maul to Tyrel Lomax.

What could have been 14-0 became a Springboks’ 22 entry at the other end, while the five minutes remaining for Sacha Feinberg-Mgomenzulu’s sin bin evaporated with the All Blacks having no ball.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ardie Savea’s injury – 30th minute

The All Blacks had put up a Cam Roigard box kick into South Africa’s half with Jordie Barrett going up to contest with Ethan Hooker. Neither won the contest and the bouncing ball found Mannie Libbok, who raced away on the counter. The Springboks went wide-wide and ran all the way down into the All Blacks’ 22.

Savea’s ruck contest spoiled good ball and forced a knock-on by Eben Etzebeth, sparing the All Blacks in the moment but it came at a huge cost. Marx’s cleanout gave Savea a dislocated shoulder and the All Blacks lost their captain.

While Wallace Sititi was arguably the All Blacks best forward after that, it wasn’t production that the All Blacks lost in that moment. It was their talismanic leader who breathes confidence into the All Blacks.

Savea’s ability as a playmaker is irreplaceable. His two tries taken from close range, highlight his vision and instinctual talent. He can take advantage of the slightest opportunity. It was his edge play that forced Feinberg-Mngomezulu’s yellow card. He stepped inside Hooker, drew in one more and offered the back hand flick to Lakai.

He threw the cutout pass to Leroy Carter to make the initial break before scooping up the scraps for his second try.

Savea is one-of-one and losing him was a costly moment.

Jesse Kriel’s knock on and Aumua stripped – 34th minute 

Centre Jesse Kriel dropped a pass stone cold giving the All Blacks a scrum 45 metres out. This was a significant momentum swing with the All Blacks holding a 12-5 lead. The All Blacks originally turned the ball over on their own five metre line, and then Kriel’s error gave them a launch platform inside the Boks half.

By the time the scrum packed there was only five minutes remaining in the half. It was crucial period to land the next blow and potentially go up by two scores headed into the half.

The scrum was rock solid and the All Blacks played the same way three times with Sititi punching over the gain line on the third carry.

On the switch back to the left they have a big openside set up. Roigard goes a little off the cuff and plays Vaa’i short. The rhythm is broken. The lock still finds Ruben Love, who hits Asafo Aumua with a hospital pass.

Aumua is jammed by Cobus Reinach making a snap read, but the hooker shrugs him off and gets upfield. Reinach comes back again and strips him of the ball which triggers a huge momentum shift.

One phase later Wiese punches through and offloads to Nche, who showed great skills to pull in the ball low. He finds Libbok, who cuts the defence all the way down to one metre from the line. Ruben Love is yellow carded. The Springboks push over for a penalty try from the scrum and it’s 12-all at half-time.

Aumua getting stripped cost the All Blacks massively; it triggered a defensive collapse, they lost a player to the bin and saw a hard-earned lead evaporate.

Sititi strip and Springboks caught offside – 42nd minute

Wallace Sititi flipped the game early in the second half when he stripped Feinberg-Mngomenzulu one-on-one of the ball and broke away downfield. The Springboks were penalised for being offside giving the All Blacks a golden opportunity to score first and early in the second half.

Turning down a shot at goal, the All Blacks attempt a maul from the 10 metres line before getting into their phase work. They tried a classic pet play back to the blindside where the No.14 pops up outside the hooker, this time Aumua.

Roigard cut out everyone to pass straight to the No.2 on the edge. The Boks’ D had it covered, so Jordan tried cutting inside. He coughed up possession for a knock-on in the tackle of Morne van der Berg.

It was another costly mistake inside the Boks’ 22. Aside from turning down three and wasting a chance to score, the Boks turned straight back to the scrum. George Bower is called for hinging and South Africa get another easy exit.

Will Jordan kicks dead – 63rd minute

Although Leroy Carter went from hero-to-zero in the space of 60 seconds after setting up the Jordan try with his missed tackle on Kriel, that wasn’t the moment the game was lost.

The Springboks had a slim lead 19-17 with the game in the balance for a while after that. There was still plenty of time to take back the lead.

One attacking possession by the All Blacks was lost to a Marx turnover when Sam Darry got caught isolated. From there, the All Blacks return serve and force a knock-on leading to a scrum.

The game is in balance with the All Blacks needing to exit well. They call for a winger’s kick, spreading it to the Jordan’s edge and he thumps it downfield. The kick goes dead, resulting in a scrum 35 metres out to the South Africans.

It was a fatal error. Again, with South Africa’s scrum machine in full flight they win another penalty, kick to the line and maul 20 metres on the All Blacks’ pack.

Not excusing the efforts of the pack who were demolished twice in quick succession, it’s Jordan’s momentum killing error that hands the Boks that opportunity. They go up 26-17 with 15 minutes to go, altering the probabilities of the game.

Of these five game-changing moments, four are preventable. Three are handling errors, and the other is a kick error.

These small moments can decide Test matches, but for Rennie it’s concerning just how quickly one error has turned into catastrophe during this series.

Currently the All Blacks are unable to compound good moments, while being very good at compounding bad moments.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

83 Comments
P
PB 43 days ago

Pointless article.If you go through any match you can find small moments which might turn the match one way or the other.I think the only significant one mentioned in the article is Savea going off.A huge loss.

Things like the Aumua strip,would not have happened if Kriel hadn’t knocked on,so which one is more significant?Jordan kicking the ball dead?This happens a lot when you are not used to how far the ball travels at altitude.

S
SO 44 days ago

Carter’s 2 missed tackles were schoolboy stuff. Terrible misses one on one.I think those mistakes were the biggest problem. Make those tackles then there is a different reflection on the game. Sure there were others but to me they were inexcusable.

S
Stooge 44 days ago

TEMU Ben’s arrogance or ignorance??

“the pair may have faced a cover tackle from Cobus Reinach, however, Vaa’i has enough power and speed to win that match up” Does TEMU Ben really think that Vaa’i is going to outrun Reinach?

J
JW 45 days ago

It was their talismanic leader who breathes confidence into the All Blacks… Savea’s ability as a playmaker is irreplaceable.

I think this is a bit rose tinted, hype train hyperbole. If anything Ardie (remember he had another season at 7 with Rennie at Kobe) is now more of the all round 7 that we wanted from him last year, than he is from his POTY 23’ season where he was an attacking menace. And he’s also been shown repeatedly fail leading in such important/difficult matches, though that might have changed/improved with an attitude and outlook shift.


I’ll try a rewatch and see if I can note his absence though. But I did not his lack of urgency covering the wide channel when DDA went around Carter. He’s probably a more rounded player now than when he moved to 8 having mostly been a seven, but I feel he can only bring the level needed for 30/40 minutes off the bench these days.

Aumua getting stripped cost the All Blacks massively

That’s ruff, I think they could have got out of that without the penalty against Love (for being offside behind the line, I’m not critizing Love instead here).

Will Jordan kicks dead – 63rd minute

Idk about that, I’d more saying Barretts missed touch and the two kickable goals where more key moments/failures.

D
DK 45 days ago

BS do you just write click bait articles? Instead of writing how your beloved All Blacks lost the game..write about how great the Springboks were. Also remember this is the Bok team you said will run out of steam due to high minutes played.


I suggest you sharpen your journo skills and be less biased and leave conditioning stats and general Springbok insights to qualified professionals and Dr Rassie.

I
Itsallacademic 45 days ago

BS do you just write click bait articles?

Yes.

C
CHILLI 45 days ago

Time to put the sword in and give them a 10 point article next week.

B
Barefoot 45 days ago

I’m not a Kiwi but my read on the general sentiment on the NZ side is not that this was a catastrophe (your word Ben), you guys represented well and showed a lot to build on towards the WC. Many many positives, as an AB fan I would be bullish.


It has been a cracking series, neither side at their best but you could argue neither side allowed the other to play at their best. Interested to hear from ABs fans if you agree this was a catastrophic loss?

J
Jacque 45 days ago

It simple “Ben” GET GUYS THAT CAN SCRUM. Otherwise you’ll NEVER win a WC again.

r
rs 45 days ago

They need the ability to kick the ball between the sticks. DMac is probably their most reliable goal kicker and should be doing it. Even Mouanga’s kicking was poor in the tour game

J
JB 45 days ago

I do think the handling errors are a huge contributing factor here, because of the power of the SA scrum. The ABs’ game plan was to minimise the number of defensive scrums. So I actually think Ben Smith is right to highlight these errors as significant.


Regarding the ABs’ conditioning; they do struggle to keep up with the Boks’ anaerobic fitness. Obviously the ABs’ would prefer an aerobic game in which they are keeping the ball in hand, at pace, going through the phases. Much like the first twenty-five minutes, when you could see the Boks’ rush defence had slowed right down. Kolisi said afterwards that the Boks’ won the game by only conceding 12 points during that period of AB momentum. They wrestled back control, got some possession, got some set piece.


Love watching these two teams and the clash of styles.

G
GrahamVF 45 days ago

But unless you take the tight forward pieces out the game if you are not anaerobically fit when you have to do heavy lifting you can’t just immediately go back to the same level of aerobic fitness. It takes recovery time and if you are asked to do it a few times over the recovery time stretches exponentially.If you are not going to go into clutch games hoping there are no scrum and maul defences it’s a bit of a lottery and not great odds.

N
Nickers 45 days ago

I would exclude the ones that were a result of Springbok pressure and focus on the unforced errors. The two strips are down to the Springbok defender being better than the All Black ball carrier and winning the moment. Against SA I would expect that to happen half of the time.


The ones that really hurt us were the unforced errors. Vaa’i’s drop of that ball was huge. But the All Blacks completely lost the plot in the 10 minutes that followed while SFM was in the bin. We had all the momentum, they were down a man, their best back had just left the field forcing a rejig of the backline while they were down a man. We could not have scripted a better start, but…


Captain fantastic who had an outstanding game should have been leading the way in keeping a cool head and turning the screws, but he personally gave away 2 completely unnecessary breakdown penalties during this time. We opened the door and rolled out the red carpet. Not a shred of ruthlessness or even recognising the game situation.


Jordan’s knock on and kick dead were disastrous. One of many ABs players who had a night to forget, but that lack of leadership and match awareness while SFM was in the bin is a bigger worry than individual errors.

D
DP 45 days ago

Question:


Do you think the Boks have another gear to show?


Do you think the ABs have another gear to show?

I
Itsallacademic 45 days ago

Yes and yes. But not the same extent.


NZ can cut down mistakes, improve discipline, and work on some technicalities in the tight. However, I don't think their set piece issues are easily addressed and the power game will remain an issue.

They are in 4th gear at present and can still go up, but only marginally.


The Boks still lack cohesion from all the experimentation recently, their playmakers (Pollard and SFM) are out of form so their attack is one dimensional, and they have only really played their power game so far despite the ability they showed last year to play expansively. Plus their defense has been uncharacteristically leaky, which will also improve with more time together. They are only in 3rd at the moment and can still go up quite a bit.


Of course this is very subjective, but it feels like the Springboks just haven't clicked yet while NZ are actually exceeding expectations on this tour.

N
NoLongerARuck 45 days ago

Both, the All Blacks must improve at set piece, contestable and high ball game and in the scrum. Their attack is buzzing but their execution in critical moments under pressure let them down. The Springboks can make significant improvements to their cohesion in attack and their defensive sets which at times gave too much space on the outside and was exposed significantly by some skillful All Black attack

J
Jacque 45 days ago

You almost write the same amount of CRAP here as you do on X. Get a life.


You went as far as to blame SUPERSPORT for a lack of replays.


Then moan about Springboks doing what they do best, playing collision based rugby,beating the All Blacks while all they do is GO SIDE TO SIDE, just like Scotland.

G
GrahamVF 45 days ago

Rennie picked a running side. When they had to do some heavy lifting they ran out of gas in the last 25 minutes, when they expected to be running rings around the Boks. They are training to run all day and they are clearly not doing any progressive resistance training - they don’t have the intensive forward training the Boks do so when they are required to push in a defensive scrum upon scrum for 30 seconds at a time it exhausts them.

Which is the main reason why the Boks hold the ball in the scrum on their put in. Everyone thinks it’s just to get a penalty - it’s not. It’s to tire out the opposition pack.

I watched the maul try carefully over again - the AB’s were exhausted. Other than the consolation try try after the game was over, the Boks were the far stronger side in the last 20 minutes.

j
johnz 45 days ago

Exactly. I’ve been saying it for years - our players are primed for an aerobic contest, but they get beasted in an anearobic fight. Once power comes into play, it’s simply exhausting for our players who aren’t conditioned for it.


For some reason too many people get upset when this is pointed out.


Fitness has always been a point of pride in NZ rugby - it’s just now our fitness is not fit for purpose.


Until there’s a change in mindset we will struggle to beat the big teams consistently from from week to week.

A
AH 45 days ago

Wondering about clearing rucks. So much interference in the game around head clash, croc roll yet 2 broken shoulders in this series from hits at the ruck. Rugby incidents?

j
johnz 45 days ago

It’s an incredibly dangerous part of the game, I agree. Players are left in vulnerable positions with some huge hits coming in. It’s something that should be looked at - and that’s not a moan because of this incident.


I’ve seen far too many injuries at all levels of the game from that phase of play, injuries that put players out for months. Rugby is a physical contest - I get it. But ruck cleaning often takes the contest out of it and gives a player a free hit.

c
cnw 45 days ago

A problem for both teams is the tucking in of the elbow and shoulder charging into the contact. Jacobson got pinged for it in the game against Ireland. But nobody got penalised for it on this tour. Have a look at Marx’s contact on Ardie and see what you think. Shoulder charge?

G
GrahamVF 45 days ago

Lack of power training.

W
Wayneo 45 days ago

Cry me a river, Ben. It's all just spilled milk now.


The Springboks physically dismantled the ABs so trying to reduce an 80-minute performance to just 5 moments is pathetic.


Bower didn't hinge for fun, his spine buckled because the Bok pack out-leveraged him.


Ox Nche drove perfectly straight and square (Law 19.19), forcing the ABs to walk backwards until they disintegrated.


The only reason Roigard was panic-feeding through the flankers' feet was pure survival.


If that ball stayed in the tunnel for more than 2 seconds, the scrum was ending up in the FNB Stadium nosebleeds.


Please stop moaning about Jordan kicking dead or Aumua getting stripped, its all over, done and dusted we move on to the next game.


The reality is that when the Bomb Squad rolled out, your tight five got physically bullied, out-leveraged, and technically exposed under the letter of the law.

K
Kroko 45 days ago

Your whole article’s premise is that it was the All Blacks’ to lose, which is clearly wrong. How about five moments that won the Springboks the match? You’re embarrassing yourself with this jingoist. Not even making a pretense of being objective.

G
GL 45 days ago

Boks played very well indeed but ABs beat the abs

j
johnz 45 days ago

Looking at the macro picture - the game wasn’t lost because of a few mistakes.


If we’re honest, South Africa left a lot of points on the park through mistakes of their own. After Savea left, we never looked like winning that game.


The reality is, for all our progress, we’ve got two big issues to fix. They’re the same one’s we had in Wellington last year.


Conditionining and leadership.


We were physically dominated. For all the talk of our superior 80 minute fitness, the reality is, the Boks are at least as fit but also more powerful. They beasted us in the Scrums, lineouts, mauls and collisions. And they played better than us for 80 minutes, at altitude - no less.


How we fix those quickly - I really don’t know. It’s not part of the NZ Rugby pshyche to focus on power and our players will go back to the lightweight SR comp with a focus on high ball in play minutes.


Then there’s leadership. Once Savea went off we were ruderless. I watched intently to see who would step up. Nobody.


Jacobson became captian, but you wouldn’t have known it - he was a massive dissapointment. I didn’t see anyone take charge.


Not only that - there were no players stepping up with the big plays that swing momentum and condfidence AKA Marx. To win big games you need World class players who can rise in the big moments. Again - we’ve relied so much on Savea to produce momentum shifting plays when it really matters.


For too long Senior players like Taylor and the Barretts etc have dominated the leadership roles, but a couple are way past their best.


We need young players to take ownership in the big moments now. Until that happens we’ll see the same thing happen again. Mistakes happen because of pressure - you need leaders who can swing that momentum back.

u
unknown 45 days ago

Why the All Blacks would leave someone like DuPlessis Kirifi at home is beyond me. He is exactly the inspiring leader you need around when Ardi goes off or gets injured.

I
Itsallacademic 45 days ago

Weird take on the leadership. I agree it was an problem but the issue was a lack of senior players (Taylor, Barrets). If someone like Taylor was on the field, the leadership vacuum Savea left would not have been an issue. Yet you criticize older players and ask for younger players to step up.


Springboks won because they had a plethora of senior players and leaders on the field keeping them calm under pressure. Even if the ABs refuse stick to their all out running and attack approach and ignore the set piece, maybe learning from the Springboks and keeping some elder statesmen around to help deal with pressure and leadership is a good idea.

c
cnw 45 days ago

A bit pessimistic here Johnnz - we got pasted in a scrum and a maul. I am all for a bit of self flagellation after a loss but lets remember we also scored four tries, one of them early in the second half and another at the end. And we were still moving at pace right to the end of the game - Wallace walking through tackles, triggering a movement from 60+ metres out that ultimately led to try in the face of desperate defence. The Boks clearly deserved to win, but its not the abject failure many are making it out to be.

G
GrahamVF 45 days ago

You’re 100% right johnz. The AB’s are training purely aerobic fitness but when the forwards are required to do heavy lifting in the form of 30 second scrums and maul defences their muscles have to go into recovery mode before they can run properly. In a game of few scrums and maul defences the AB’s finish strong - very much like the French a few years ago.

But when they have to defend three or four scrums in relative quick succession they just don’t recover for quite a long while and the accumulative effect will be devastating in the last quarter.

This was exactly why Rassie called for a scrum from Willemse’s mark in. the quarter final.

Rugby fitness is not athletic fitness - especially for the forwards - all eight of them.

B
Boddasaffa 45 days ago

Thanks Johnz , great read, wish you could replace BS’s BS articles. Agree when Ardie was on the field he was like 5 extra players. Experience and games like this blood and provide the composure needed. For RE not to change his team like he has in the past shows how much we respect the AB’s. All the chest beating by coaches, ex coaches and pundits was not needed. Everything was said on the field. All in all it was a great game played by two great teams. No one should feel they lost especially these 2 teams as they gave us what we wanted. The last game will be hard for you boys but you will create depth and give your younger guys a feel for what is required. Well done Kiwis. You have helped us more than you know and upped the level of rugby - other teams beware.

N
NoLongerARuck 45 days ago

Its easy to look at mistakes in isolation and say that perhaps had they converted a few chances they would have won. The Springboks on the other side of that coin had their own issues. They generated 10 entries and could and perhaps should have scored another 4 more times from those entries but good defence and a lack of execution meant the Boks scored at a very inefficient rate of 2.6 points per entry. In high profile games where the defence is good mistakes are inevitable and efficiency drops off. Thats part of big matches. Its fair to say that the team that takes their chances is the team that will win. The All Blacks didnt take their chances, they didnt win and this will be a great learning experience for them before the next world cup. The All Blacks leave South Africa with their heads held high a far better team than when they arrived.

L
LW 45 days ago

A lot of those examples includes mistakes from South africa which could have led to NZ scoring and would have maybe been included in an article entitled “the 5 moments that lost south africa the match”. There were huge moments for both sides and the momentum swund back and forth.


But the ability to keep momentum once it swung was an issue for NZ. Retaining possession at restarts and sorting out the exit plays is becoming a bit of an problem for the All blacks and has led to the momentum shift last week and this week.


As much as has been made about the scrum, I think the breakdown has been almost more of an issue. South africa gained several penalties from their scrums, but they already were in possession and in control of the situation atbthat set piece.

the breakdown issue was more of a problem for nz in that they were prevented from gaining or building on their attacking momentum which is essentially their biggest strength over South africa. This was particularly evident in the last quarter and I think was a reason the all blacks struggled to dominate in the last quarter the way they did at EP or even to some extent in Cape Town.

C
CT 45 days ago

Poepstreep

C
CT 45 days ago

Ouch it must hurt Bennie ,scrum just pushed them out the park ,eating some humble Wellington pie, Boks just too powerful, 3rd victory incoming.

c
cnw 45 days ago

Most kiwis on these posts have acknowledged the Boks deservedly won. But it was nothing like Wellington - 4 tries each - two missed conversions and a missed penalty making the difference. Remember too that the ABs won 5 tries to 1 in the first test. So keep counting your chickens CT - hope your boys are thinking that way too.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close