Northern | US

Will Skelton's dramatic weight loss was a major talking point today


Will Skelton (l) in 2017 and (r) 2018 (Photo by Bryn Lennon/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

Will Skelton’s size has been both a blessing and curse for the giant Australian secondrow.

It was Skelton’s size that first caught the Australian media’s eye back in 2010. The then 6’8, 135kg 18-year-old schoolboy was pictured in the Courier Mail towering above then Wallaby No.8, 6’4, 122kg Wycliff Palu. According to the report, he had to import size 17 boots from the United States.

ADVERTISEMENT

He now wears size 19.

After entering the Waratahs academy in 2011, Michael Cheika, the then head coach of the franchise, signed him to the Super Rugby side’s extended player squad ahead of the 2013 campaign. The lock – of Samoan heritage – made his senior debut later that year against the Stormers and before facing the British and Irish Lions.

By the time he rose through the Waratahs ranks to a place in the first team (and tipping the scales at over 140kg) it had become a task beyond most commentators to mention the Auckland born lock without reference to his enormous proportions.

Like many a big man, questions around his fitness levels began to be asked. Despite making 18 appearances for the Wallabies between 2014 and 2016, persistent criticism of both his form and fitness levels saw him dropped from the national team by Cheika.

He headed North. After a short-term deal with Saracens, he signed a two years contract in 2017 and but once again his weight is the topic of conversation.

A slimmed down Skelton 2.0 was on display at Kingston Park in Saracens opening match of the season.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Nick Mullins, Skelton has dropped 12kg over the summer, bringing to 21 the total numbers of kilos lost by the lock since his arrival at the London club.

Skelton at his heaviest was somewhere in the mid 140kgs, so that puts him approximately between 120kg and 130kg presently.

And his weight cut appears to be paying dividends. Indeed his remarkable workrate with ball-in-hand and at the breakdown had commentators’ tongue wagging and he duly picked up the man of the match award against the Falcons.

In an post-match interview with BT, forwards coach Alex Sanderson even commented that Skelton’s torso was noticeably different, with his pectoral muscles now distinct from his tummy and not ‘one big mass’.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mark McCall once described him as the ‘biggest human’ he had ever seen and frighteningly, he’s the smallest of three brothers. Brothers Cameron and Logan are both taller and heavier than him, with Logan said to be pushing 7 feet.

The conversation around Skelton may always be about his size, but at least now it appears to a be positive one.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NoLongerARuck 8 minutes ago
'The phoney war on the Greatest Rivalry tour is already gale-force in its intensity.'

2 pretty distinct camps developing around this tour but are NZ concentrating their fire where they should be. South Africa built 114 rucks at the weekend, had 148 carries and forced Argentina into 188 tackles. Argentina made 92% of their tackles and defended like beasts. South Africa also made just 147 passes indicating the one off runner was a big theme behind that thanks to Argentina line speed and a willingness to fan out on defence. The Boks also made 43 kicks, how did they do that while building 114 rucks? Lots of possession thats how. Argentina focused on making tackles and meeting physicality head on in the contact zone, they let the Boks have the rucks and the ball. Springboks also couldnt win the ball back from the contestables, kicked too long, made too many mistakes, retreating catchers taking the ball over their heads worked. Argentina could and perhaps should have drawn despite their scrum and set piece struggling. Even so they gave the All Blacks a template on how to defend the Boks. Their wide attack also exposed space and if they didnt have 16 handling errors they might have done something special. NZ are talking about running the Boks off their feet, playing with tempo and pace and building rucks. Perhaps the best way to beat the Boks is to let them have the ball, make mistakes and then spread it wide using your skill to beat the defence? So my question is, are NZ firing shots on and off the field in the wrong direction playing into the hands of an opponent that wants them to run? Judging by the Stormers game I would say yes.

55 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close