Why the All Blacks don't play anything like the Crusaders is beyond comprehension
I’m assuming we all saw the same thing on Saturday night?
One team looking to play skillful, high-tempo rugby and the other just doing whatever it takes to win.
In that regard, the enterprising Chiefs didn’t look dissimilar to All Blacks sides of recent vintage, with the Crusaders resembling Ireland or France.
You can whinge about refereeing decisions during Saturday’s Super Rugby Pacific final and you can argue that the Chiefs didn’t get the rub of the green.
But you also have to face the reality that the “good’’ guys don’t always win, in rugby matches of consequence.
Again, to go back to the top, I think we all recognise what happened in Hamilton on Saturday.
What I don’t get, though, is why All Blacks sides struggle to play like the Crusaders have for season after season.
I mean there are Crusaders in the All Blacks, after all. Guys who are masters at piling pressure on opponents and paring back game plans to suit the winner-takes-all circumstances of knockout footy.
How is it then that we increasingly look at the All Blacks as having a soft underbelly and of being unable to prevail when it really matters?
Is it coaching? Is it players? Will it all change when Scott Robertson eventually takes charge?
I watched Saturday night’s final and lamented Richie Mo’unga’s imminent three-year departure. I looked at his composure and ability to execute and couldn’t help thinking we simply don’t have another first five-eighths capable of delivering under pressure.
And yet, most of us would agree Mo’unga has never really been able to do for the All Blacks what he has so often done for the Crusaders.
Beyond whatever Ian Foster has or hasn’t told Mo’unga to do – during his many years as All Blacks assistant, then head coach – I come back to Beauden Barrett.
Now I’ve written often of my admiration for Barrett. Of the disservice I believe was done to him by the All Blacks and my belief that he should be an automatic choice at first-five.
I now think I was wrong. That I put too much store in Barrett’s performances in 2015, 2016 and 2017 and that his presence in the All Blacks’ squad has stifled Mo’unga’s development.
I still harbour a view that Barrett can be the player he once was, with New Zealand Warriors playmaker Shaun Johnson as an example.
I see parallels between Barrett and Johnson and think not all hope in the former is lost.
But it doesn’t change the fact that – in the Crusaders – we have the blueprint for sustained success and – in Mo’unga – a proven on-field driver of that success.
Only Mo’unga’s future lies elsewhere, beyond this season, and the All Blacks don’t play anything like the Crusaders do.
If that kind of rugby wasn’t in our DNA, then that wouldn’t bother so much.
But it is and many folk would have watched the Super Rugby Pacific final firm in the knowledge that the Crusaders would prevail.
That for all the brilliance of the Chiefs’ back-three and the unpredictability of Damian McKenzie, that the utterly predictable, completely reliable Crusaders would find a way to win.
I don’t know what the All Blacks will achieve this year, although I have to say I don’t look at the playing and coaching personnel and feel unbridled confidence.
But I do know – having seen the Crusaders do it for years and years and years – that there is a way to win games when it matters.
That substance is more valuable than style and that, actually, fans just want the All Blacks to win by whatever means necessary.
Comments on RugbyPass
I am really looking forward to Leigh Halfpenny playing his first Super rugby game for the Crusaders Playing a long side his former Welsh and Scarlets team mate Johnny McNicoll.Johnny has been playing great, back in a Crusaders jersey.The attack has strengthened big time. Also looking forward to David Havili at 10. David is a class act, it also allows Dallas McLeod to remain at 12. A good thing.
1 Go to commentsIf he had stopped insisting on playing in the backrow, instead of wing, where everyone told him he should, he would have been a Bok years ago….
11 Go to comments‘Salads don’t win scrums’ 😂 I love that.
19 Go to commentsCan’t wait for the article that talks about misogyny in Ireland. Somehow.
16 Go to commentsI would like to see a rule change, when the attacking team is held up over the try line, by allowing the defensive team to restart a goal line drop out releases the pressure for the defensive team, but what if the attacking team had to restart a tap 5m out from the defensive team it gives the attacking team to apply more pressure, there are endless options for the attacking side and it will keep the fans in suspence.
2 Go to commentsLess modern South African males predictably triggered.
16 Go to commentsMy heart is with Quins, but the head is convinced Toulouse have too much. Ntamack is back, his timing and wisdom has been missed.
1 Go to commentsWow, what a starting line up for the Sharks) Tasty up front,kremer vs Tshituka or venter …fiery ,,Lavannini ,,will he knobble etzebeth? Biggest game for belleau?
1 Go to commentsIt was rubbish to watch, Blues weren’t even present. Did what they had to do, nothing more. Should be better next week against canes.
1 Go to commentsI’ve just noticed that this match has an all-French refereeing team. Surely a game like this ought to have a neutral ref? Although looking at the BBC preview of the Saints game, Raynal is also down as reffing that - so there may be some confusion about who is reffing what.
1 Go to commentsIf Havili can play anywhere in the back line, why not first 5. #10.
11 Go to commentsThe dressing room had already left for their summer break before they ran out in Dublin that year, and that’s on the coach. Franco Smith has undoubtedly made progress, particularly their maul, developing squad players and increasing squad depth. And against a very tight budget too. That said they were too lightweight last year and got found out against both Toulon and Munster in consecutive games. Better this season so far but they’ve developed something of a slow start habit occasionally, most notably losing at home to Northampton who played them at their own game. Play offs will ultimately show whether there has been tangible progress on last year, or not…!
2 Go to commentsAustralian Rugby has been a disaster, by not incorporating learning from previous successful campaigns. QLD Reds 2011 - Waratahs 2014. Players, coaches and administrators appoint there representatives for scheduled meetings, organisation’s agreement’s assessments and correspondence. This why a unified Rugby Union under one entity works. Every Rugby nation has taken that path. Was most difficult in the Northern hemisphere with over 100 years of club rugby before the game become professional. Took a lot of humility for those unions to eventually work together.
7 Go to commentsThough Wilson’s sacking was pretty brutal, it wasn’t just down to that Leinster game; Glasgow had a lot of 2nd half collapses that season, in the URC and Europe, and only just scraped into the playoffs. Franco Smith has definitely been an improvement, some players are delivering far more than they did under Wilson.
2 Go to commentsjesus - that front 5!
1 Go to commentsShould be an absolute cracker of a game! Will be great to see DuPont & Ntamack in tandem once again🔥
1 Go to commentsBest team ever…. To have played? These guys are still pressure chokers. Came nowhere when it counted. What a joke
84 Go to commentsMusk defends anonymous terrorism, fascism, threats against individuals and children etc etc But a Rugby club account….lock ‘em up!!!
2 Go to commentsActually the era defining moment came a few years earlier. February 2002 to be precise, when Michael D Higgins as finance minister at the time introduced his sports persons tax relief bill to the dial. As the politicians of the day stated “It seems to be another daft K Club frolic born in Kildare amongst the well-paid professional jockeys with whom the Minister plays golf” and that the scheme represented “a savage uncaring vision of Ireland and one that should be condemned”. The irfu and Leinster would be nowhere near the position they are in today without this key component of the finances.
5 Go to commentsIt is crystal clear that people who make such threats on line should be tried and imprisoned. Those with responsibility in social media companies who don’t facilitate this should be convicted. In real life, I have free speech to approach someone like Reinach and verbally threaten him. I am risking a conviction or a slap but I could do it. In the old days, If someone anonymously threatened someone by letter the police would ask and use evidence from the postal system. Unlike the Post, social media companies have complete instant and legal access to the content in social media. They make money from the data, billions. Yet, they turn a blind eye to terrorism, Nazi-ism and industrial levels of threats against individuals including their address and childrens schools being published online all from ananoymous accounts not real people. They claim free speech. Free speech for anonymous trolls/voilent thugs threatening people under false names? The fault is with the perps but also social media companies who think anonymous personas posting death threats constitutes free speech.
2 Go to comments