Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

There’s nothing to be gained by playing Damian McKenzie against Japan

Damian McKenzie looks on during the New Zealand All Blacks 2024 season launch in June (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Does that mean Damian McKenzie’s a dirttracker now?

I know Harry Plummer’s not a fully-fledged member of the All Blacks squad to play Japan, but I’d have started him at 10 against the Brave Blossoms. The guy’s been carted around for the bulk of the international season and we’re still none the wiser about whether he’s any good.

ADVERTISEMENT

So, the fact it’s McKenzie who’s the starting first five-eighth for Saturday’s clash in Yokohama does suggest to me he’s no longer the primary playmaker in New Zealand’s best XV.

We saw Beauden Barrett picked at 10, with reasonable success, in the recent win over Australia and can now only presume he’ll be given the same responsibility when the team meets England on November 3.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Like I alluded to, there’s nothing to be gained by playing McKenzie against Japan. All Blacks coach Scott Robertson has seen all there is to see of McKenzie at test level.

But he knows next to nothing about Plummer, Ruben Love (who’s in the reserves this week) or even Stephen Perofeta who, let’s remember, is a first five-eighth by trade.

Is McKenzie an insurance policy against defeat to Japan? Surely not. I mean the All Blacks have to be too good to be worrying about that.

Equally, what would it matter if Saturday’s game ended in another defeat. We’ve become so accustomed to those over the last few years that another one wouldn’t suddenly cause New Zealand Rugby’s empire to crumble.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s not like it’s not falling down in a few places already.

Head-to-Head

Last 3 Meetings

Wins
0
Draws
0
Wins
3
Average Points scored
27
57
First try wins
33%
Home team wins
0%

As I look at this 23, the least interesting player to watch this week is undoubtedly McKenzie.

Centre Billy Proctor appears to be making huge strides, Cam Roigard’s back at halfback, Wallace Sititi gets a start at No.8, Samipeni Finau’s at 6 and Peter Lakai will hopefully get a few good minutes off the bench.

These are guys with the potential to force their way into the All Blacks’ top side and I’ll be intrigued to see what they make of the opportunity.

As an aside, I read – as if it were news – that Robertson has made mass changes to this game. Sorry, am I meant to be surprised that the All Blacks’ second XV is getting a run against one of the two second-class opponents included on the itinerary?

ADVERTISEMENT

I thought that was the point – if we overlook the obvious reason of money – of Japan and Italy being on the schedule.

If the bulk of this Saturday’s team gets named to play England, then that’ll be news. In the meantime, you’ll have to forgive me for not being bowled over by the revelation that the 23 to meet Japan differs from the one that beat Australia.

You don’t say.

No, if there’s news out of this team naming, it’s that McKenzie’s days as the designated first five-eighth appear to be numbered – if not over – and that, as a result, we’ve likely seen the last of Will Jordan languishing on the wing.

That’s good news in my book.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

33 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

284 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT