Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Sale 'no knee' discussion has taken another fresh twist in South Africa

(Photo by Adam Davy/PA Images via Getty Images)

Premiership Rugby’s Rugby Against Racism initiative last weekend was perhaps defined more by those who did not take a knee before kick-off than those who did – and now a South African trade union joined the debate initially sparked by the actions of the Sale players last Friday.

ADVERTISEMENT

In support of the Black Lives Matter movement, each Gallagher Premiership side showed their support in different ways, but there was a large contingent of players that opted not to take a knee, something that has been seen in many sports over the past months. 

Players have already defended their decision, such as Saracens’ Billy Vunipola who chose not to kneel for religious reasons. However, Sale Sharks drew the most attention on Friday night when eleven of their starting XV chose not to kneel, eight of which were South African. 

Video Spacer

Saracens’ Owen Farrell opens up about mental health with football’s Rio Ferdinand

Video Spacer

Saracens’ Owen Farrell opens up about mental health with football’s Rio Ferdinand

Those included Springbok World Cup winners Faf de Klerk and Lood de Jager‚ twins Jean-Luc and Daniel du Preez‚ their older brother Robert‚ Akker van der Merwe‚ Coenie Oosthuizen and club captain Jono Ross. 

England’s Manu Tuilagi, Scotland wing Byron McGuigan and Wales prop WillGriff John also stood. They did, however, wear the Rugby Against Racism t-shirts to show support for the Premiership’s cause. 

Sale’s director of rugby Steve Diamond was quick to dismiss the issue, but South Africa’s Minister of Sports, Arts, and Culture, Nathi Mthethwa, asked for an explanation as to why so many players have taken this stance and urged South Africa Rugby to respond. 

But the South African trade union Solidarity have addressed the minister’s inquiry, saying the players were well within their rights to remain standing. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Werner Human, the union’s deputy chief executive officer for legal affairs and research, provided more information on Solidarity’s website. He said (translated from Afrikaans on Google): 

“Such behaviour is completely outside the competence of the minister and infringes on these players’ freedom of speech, beliefs and religion. In fact, we are not even talking about freedom of expression – the minister is trying to bring about forced expression of speech here. It can never be tolerated.”

The head of the vocational guilds division, Hennie Bierman, developed this reaction further, explaining the position the players are in. He said: “Athletes are already in a particularly vulnerable position with regard to job security. We cannot allow their constitutional rights to be violated either.”

With Sale set to play again on Friday against Exeter, their players’ actions before kick-off will likely again be scrutinised.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 6 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

220 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT