Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Support reportedly growing for Australia option as Lions officials set to discuss finer details

By Sam Smith
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

British and Irish Lions officials will meet on Thursday to discuss for the first time the proposal from Rugby Australia to host the series versus South Africa. The Australian idea was met with a tepid response when it initially emerged last month, but support for bringing the tour to the home of the Wallabies has since reportedly grown.  

ADVERTISEMENT

With it increasingly likely that matches in South Africa would have to be played behind closed doors and amid the ongoing uncertainty that crowds could attend if the Lions tour was held in the UK and Ireland, the Australia alternative has now gained momentum.

With an offer from the United Arab Emirates the only other hosting invitation that has been received, the Australian proposal is poised to be reviewed in detail and the potential for sell-out crowds attending matches will be viewed as hugely attractive for a tour where the Lions and the Springboks would operate out of hubs, most likely based in Sydney or Perth.   

Video Spacer

Wales boss Wayne Pivac on Louis Rees-Zammit and the prospect of facing England in round three

Video Spacer

Wales boss Wayne Pivac on Louis Rees-Zammit and the prospect of facing England in round three

Speaking in an interview with The Telegraph, Hamish McLennan, the chairman of Rugby Australia, said: “If we sold out Sydney or Perth, which is achievable if we are allowed to have full crowds, it would just be mind-blowing for the players. I know lockdown in the UK has been tough but in Sydney life is relatively normal. We can successfully host this.

“The New South Wales government is committed to hosting and running sports of all types and are probably the best at doing it in the world. The players would really enjoy it and I’m confident we could also deliver a really decent cheque back to South Africa and the Lions. We will get it sorted if we are told by April.

“It is an evolving situation but if you look at what we did with New Zealand and Argentina last year, we created ‘bubbles’ where they were able to train and quarantine and we would do the same for the Lions and South Africa.

“There was no diminishment in their training capabilities. Take Argentina, they knocked off the All Blacks for the first time ever and everyone had a great time. We just need a commitment and then we can get it organised.”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 3 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Blacks Sevens playmaker whose name is now next to Jonah Lomu and Christian Cullen All Blacks Sevens playmaker named HK's best
Search