Northern | US

Super Rugby Pacific say Tupou Vaa'i try should have been disallowed

Tupou Vaa'i scores his controversial try.

Super Rugby Pacific officials have clarified that the decision to award Tupou Vaa’i a try during the 32nd minute of the Chiefs’ Round 1 clash against the Blues was incorrect.

ADVERTISEMENT

While neither the referee Ben O’Keeffe nor the commentators took umbrage with Vaa’i’s effort, Super Rugby Pacific have had their say on the matter. The 6’6, 118kg All Blacks lock pointed with a finger to his head after leaping over a defender to score, as if to suggest he’d outthought his opponents, but it turns out the act was illegal.

Competition management confirmed the incident was reviewed post-match and determined the Chiefs forward had left the ground to avoid a tackle, rather than simply diving forward to score.

VIDEO

Simply put, the try should not have been awarded.

The ruling references World Rugby Clarification 3-2022, which states that while a player may dive forward to score, leaving the ground to avoid or hurdle a tackler constitutes dangerous play and must be sanctioned accordingly.

A statement reads: “Super Rugby Pacific management has reviewed the decision to award a try to Chiefs player Tupou Vaa’i in the 32nd minute of Saturday’s Round 1 game against the Blues.

“The review concluded that Vaa’i’s actions constituted leaving the ground to avoid a tackle, rather than simply diving forward to score a try, and that as a result the try should not have been awarded.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The relevant law provision is World Rugby Clarification 3-2022: In principle, in a try scoring situation, if the action is deemed to be a dive forward for a try, then it should be permitted. If a player is deemed to have left the ground to avoid a tackle; or to jump, or hurdle a potential tackler, then this is dangerous play and should be sanctioned accordingly.”

While the clarification has no bearing on the result or standings, it sends a message to the league that jumping over tackles, even in the act of scoring, is a no-no.

Create your ticketing account and unlock presale access for Rugby World Cup 2027 now

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

21 Comments
J
JW 45 days ago

Even Sky don’t have better quality footage, or was that a screenshot job done by Rugby Pass?


This is great work by SRP, it’s how it should be ruled. I can’t remember what the last few examples were again, but referees (pretty sure Owens has a counter opinion to SRPs) have not been making any rulings on intent, so in Vaa’i’s case, they rule it to be be “in the attempt to score a try”, because he did.


From memory the last example of this was a no try, pretty much an replica situation, but where the ball first landed on a defender before being grounded, so the ‘dive’ wasn’t in the act of scoring a try, there deemed to be '“avoiding the tackle”.


Every other rule is interpreted the same way, where it’s done on outcome and not intent, and I hate the chop/ankle tackle these days, but I was of the opinion this type of ruling should be different, as it seems like cheating. I’m pretty sure that was my take last time anyway. I think last time the guy jumped over the ruck, so blatant cheating, at least Vaa’i jumped over two dudes licking the grass.

S
SC 45 days ago

As Mils Muliaina correctly pointed out, one of the Highlanders tries was scored off a clearly forward pass out of the hands of Tavatavanawai and should not have counted which would have changed the result of the Crusaders match.


Refs make mistakes, it happens to all teams over a season.


My point is that Super Rugby officials should have acknowledged both mistakes not just the one in the Blues- Chiefs match.

W
WJ 43 days ago

The forward pass thing has been revisited many times but this video is worth a look to understand the momentum aspect.

https://www.reddit.com/r/rugbyunion/comments/1r4q5k7/educational_video_for_anyone_who_still_doesnt/

O
Otagoman II 45 days ago

Except it was not forward, It leaves his hand with a backward motion and with momentum drifts forward. Nareki is behind Tavatavanawai when the pass is delivered.

J
Jacque 45 days ago

Too funny. What diff does it make tho? Just threw OKeefe under the bus.


I’m pretty sure this won’t be the only time a ref makes a mistake or interprets the “LAW” his own way.

S
SB 45 days ago

Interesting. Last year it was a Chiefs staff member in a red bib kicking the ball away then Plummer missed the conversion. This year it’s an illegal try being awarded right in front of the referee’s eyes.

J
JW 45 days ago

Salty Blues fan alert!

D
DS 45 days ago

The ref explained his decision at the time. The TMO and assistants said nothing and now Head Office says it’s illegal! Anyway, Ben O’Keefe knows he owes the Chiefs.

T
TokoRFC 45 days ago

Similar to the debate over Sheehans try for the Lions last year, another thing WR need to get sorted before 2027

J
JW 45 days ago

What was that again?

O
Otagoman II 45 days ago

Sheehan’s try should of been ruled out. The reasoning for this law comes from the case of Barney Armit. He was famous for hurdling players but one time a defender caught him mid air resulting in a tip that broke his neck and killed him.


Sowakula for the Chiefs a few seasons back got away with scoring a try with a hurdle and that was ruled against the laws later.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT