Northern | US

South Africa embroiled in compliance issue with world doping agency

South Africa line up for the anthems during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Pool B match between South Africa and Tonga at Stade Velodrome on October 01, 2023 in Marseille, France. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)
Comments
50 Comments

The Springboks might have to compete under a neutral flag in the quarterfinals of the World Cup and without the opportunity of singing the national anthem due to non-compliance of the latest World Anti-Doping Code (WADA).

ADVERTISEMENT

The date for the quarterfinals is the weekend of October 14 and 15.

If the South African government does not comply by October 13, the first steps of the consequences of non-compliance will start. And one of those consequences is not being allowed to participate under a national flag.

The non-compliance by the South African National Anti-Doping Organizations (NADO) is a result of legislation not in line with the 2021 Code.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

On September 23 this year Wada announced in a statement that South Africa has fallen foul of WADA’s mandatory compliance requirements and will face the dire consequences.

The Code is a global policy that is agreed and adopted by both the sports movement and governments from around the world (public authorities).

Unfortunately, the South African government has failed to amend its outdated drug-free sport act to comply with the latest World Anti-Doping Code (WADA) that came into force in 2021.

The new revised anti-doping code from Wada came into effect on 1 January 2021 and all member countries must comply.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa and Bermuda are the only two sporting bodies and federations out of 700 that have not accepted the new code.

“Wada wishes to update stakeholders regarding the Executive Committee’s decision to endorse 10 recommendations of Wada’s independent Compliance Review Committee (CRC),” the Wada statement read.

“During its meeting, the Exco asserted non-compliance of three Anti-Doping Organisations (ADOs) with the World Anti-Doping Code (Code).

“The two National Anti-Doping Organisations (NADOs) in question are Bermuda and South Africa; and the Major Event Organization (MEO) in question is the Pan American Sports Organization (Panam Sports).

ADVERTISEMENT

“In the cases of the Bermuda and South Africa Nados, the non-compliance is a result of legislation not in line with the 2021 Code.”

According to the Daily Maverick the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (Saids) had warned the government and federations previously of the consequences of non-compliance a year ago.

The first formal meeting with sports federations and the South African Sports and Olympic Committee (Sascoc) took place in Johannesburg on 25 November 2022.

A draft bill had been sent out in April 2023 by Saids to all federations and Sascoc outlining the compliance regulations, Daily Maverick reported.

They had until May 5 for comments and amendments. After that deadline, Saids reviewed comments and inputs and made changes where appropriate.

A statement by Sports Minister Zizi Kodwa, dated September 22, on the official government website read:

“I have noted the decision by the Wada on Friday, 23 September 2023, that current South African legislation, the South African Drug-Free Sport Amendment Act, 25 of 2006, is not compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code,” Kodwa said.

“We have worked tirelessly to amend legislation as recommended by Wada. There has also been input by Wada in working with us to draft Saids’ Amendment Bill, which will now be taken through the South African Constitutional process of finalising a Bill.

“It is disappointing that South Africa has been found to be non-compliant despite this undertaking to pass legislation which meets the World Anti-Doping Code.

“I would like to reassure athletes, sports federations, and the sports public that the non-compliance finding will not affect drug testing in South African sport. Saids will continue to deliver services that protect clean sport in South Africa.

“The South African Government process for promulgating legislation is thorough and comprehensive. Any legislation, including amendments, must meet the muster of the South African Constitution and cannot contradict or nullify any existing laws.

“I officially communicated with WADA President Witold Ban?ka on South Africa’s position, and have requested to meet with him urgently.

“South Africa is committed to anti-doping in sport. Saids has done much work to meet the evolving dynamics of compliance in global sport on matters of anti-doping, anti-corruption, governance reforms, child safeguarding and data protection.

“The Department of Sport, Arts and Culture will continue to expend all efforts get the Amendment Bill adopted expeditiously.”

South Africa is compelled to comply as a signatory to the International Convention Against Doping in Sport, adopted by the General Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation in Paris on October 19, 2005.

Win VIP tickets to Rugby's Greatest Rivalry

Win a VIP match experience at the Baltimore Test, plus travel & accommodation up to $2,500.

Enter To Win
Competition ends: 28 August 2026. USA Only. No purchase necessary.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

50 Comments
B
Bob Marler 1053 days ago

So are you saying that SA players at the World Cup are not being tested and checked as stringently as any other team?


Bullshit.

B
Bob Marler 1053 days ago

“South African government embroiled in compliance issue with world doping agency”.


Go fuck yourselves - Barry and Nigel.

B
Bob Marler 1053 days ago

And if SA players are such dope heads - how inept is Wada for not uncovering all this doping? All this growth hormone pumping in kids? Or are they only concerned about filing papers and ticking boxes?


Dumbasses.

L
Lourens 1053 days ago

Well, I agree

L
Lourens 1053 days ago

The “ban the saffas” takes are starting, I see. How is it that all you Brits speak English as your mother tongue and yet still fail to actually read?

N
NE 1053 days ago

Performance enhancement doping is rife amongst grass roots and junior rugby in SA for nearly 3 decades. The IRB/WR chose to turn a blind eye to it amongst SA's international level players because that would destroy their vision of actually being a world body (with no SA there's a massive hole on the map. Hats off to WADA but not being able to play under a national flag is just a slap on the wrist. Ban the junkies, rugby will be better for it.

B
Bob Marler 1053 days ago

What a stupid comment.

N
Nigellas 1053 days ago

Creating fake accounts and up voting your own comments don’t add any credibility to your mindless drivel. Nothing is going to happen as we are subjected to the same testing protocols as any other international teams.

G
Guy 1053 days ago

Everyone knows that SA players have been taking drugs for a long time and they continue to do so. Why do their former “champions” die so young? Why can't they change their laws like others do? Why, as soon as young people play rugby, are they injected with growth hormones?

Because they know that without all that, their rugby is ordinary.

B
Bob Marler 1053 days ago

Sure thing. So name any player then that has been confirmed as having been “injected with growth hormone” as soon as they started playing rugby? What are we talking about here - 6-10 year olds on growth hormone?


Name me a case please? Of a single player confirmed as having been on growth hormone or injected with growth hormone when they were wee youngsters?


#fakenews brah. Never happened.

R
RL 1053 days ago

But how then did they catch the perps that clocked lengthy bans for controlled substances?!?! I live in the UK and can confirm that roid abuse is probably as bad as the US and NZ.

R
Rusty 1053 days ago

What utter BS. Key board warrior sucking from his Di ck. Europe and UK is rife with PEDS alwa6s has been. Try reading the article correctly…

N
NE 1053 days ago

True story.

P
Phil 1053 days ago

safa’s are roidheads. who woulda thunk it.

B
Bob Marler 1053 days ago

What a stupid comment.

N
NE 1053 days ago

Been so for a long time.

J
Jonathan 1053 days ago

Implying that all or even most South Africans use performance enhancing drugs is ridiculous. SA rugby players is just more under the spotlight than other nations because we actually win competitions of magnitude. There are just as many, if not more, young players in Europe that participate in using PEDs, just not noticed by the rest of the world because they aren’t under the spotlight.

N
Nigellas 1053 days ago

You obviously didn’t read the article. It has nothing to do with doping but merely failed to amend their current legislation before the cut-off date. Also the slang “saffas” applies to expats and not South Africans in general, so at least get your insults right before you end up making a fool out of yourself mamparra.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NoLongerARuck 4 minutes ago
'On a beggar's ration, New Zealand gave Rassie Erasmus' Springboks a dig in the ribs'

One thing that I mentioned previously as well is the Boks lose 1 home test every season where they play more than 3 games since at least 2018. This performance was remarkably similar to the one in Auckland last year where they manufactured plenty of entries but couldnt score due to heir own inefficiency. It also continued the poor theme set in the Argentina match only this time they came up against an opponent that could punish their profligacy. The Boks usually only play their best rugby by test 7 of the year. They were always vulnerable to go down at Ellis Park. Their coach too seemed lost in the Box. He brought his subs on in drips and drabs. He seemed far too reactive while the timing of Rennies Subs were superb. This NZ side is not what they were last year. They are playing on the go making plans within plans. You wont see another farce like the one with Barrett against England. If the Boks want to win they need to be positive like they were when they went to the cake tin but I see Rassie has brought Pollard back and left Libbok out. De Allende and Kriel start again while the two faster and arguably more skillful centre options in Willemse and Moodie are not included while Marx seems to be destined for another 80 minute shift with Fourie as cover (huge risk). Last years knee jerk reaction was full of positivity and free thinking. This seems like a return to the old tried and tested formula. Rassie has earned the right to gamble but for once it seems like he is on the back foot with Rennie and his All Blacks firmly under his skin and in his head.

7 Go to comments
N
NoLongerARuck 21 minutes ago
'On a beggar's ration, New Zealand gave Rassie Erasmus' Springboks a dig in the ribs'



1.How do both teams respond to contestable kicks? 2. Who adapts fastest when the original structure breaks down? 3. How does each team manage the space behind the defensive line in the shift?

Nick you asked 3 questions and these ended up being the 3 most important questions of the match. The truth is the All Blacks were far better in the shift. When they lost contestables their defence realigned faster than the attack could take advantage and they often turned the ball right back over. When they turned over the ball they exposed the Boks brutally with outstanding efficiency often eating the Boks up and exposing the gaping holes like D-mac did late on or wide areas where the Boks lost all their pace with both wingers going off injured. They adapted faster when their line was broken, they reduced the Boks to a measly 0.9 points per entry and they scored off most of their chances in the Bok 22. NZ had to change up their game having gotten none of the outcomes they wanted. The only thing in their favour was the turnovers where they lived and thrived. The Boks made their fair share of handling errors but to see a team winning 14 turnovers including 8 in the tackle at this level is truly mind blowing. It shows you how brilliant they were at breakdown time and in the tackle. They absorbed punches throughout and then countered in emphatic style. This NZ side cant be bullied, the Boks will have to outplay them and outsmart them to win



...

7 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close