Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Shock Scotland U20s loss sees Uruguay clinch final date with Spain

Uruguay celebrate after the full-time whistle (Photo by Antony Munge)

Rugby in Scotland hit a new low on Tuesday when their promotion-chasing U20s team lost to Uruguay at the Junior World Trophy in Kenya. The Scots had been relegated from the Junior World Championship following their 12th-place finish at the 2019 tournament in Argentina.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pandemic meant that it wasn’t until this year that the opportunity finally arose for them to try and win their way back into the age-grade top flight.

However, despite earlier pool successes over Zimbabwe and USA, the attempt by the fancied Scots to reach next Sunday’s Trophy final in Nairobi was quashed when they were ambushed 37-26 in their pool decider with the Uruguayans.

Video Spacer

We gave U20 New Zealand rugby players cameras and let them do whatever they want | Fuel Me

Video Spacer

We gave U20 New Zealand rugby players cameras and let them do whatever they want | Fuel Me

The surprise loss at Nyayo National Stadium means that Scotland, who finished the 2023 U20s Six Nations in fifth place ahead of Wales, will now contest third place at the Trophy against Samoa, who were beaten 28-10 by Spain in their Pool B decider.

Those results will see Uruguay and the Spanish clash in the tournament decider to decide who will secure promotion to next year’s Junior World Championship in South Africa at the expense of Japan, the team that finished in 12th place on July 14 following their loss to Italy at Paarl.

Elsewhere on match day three at the Trophy, Zimbabwe guaranteed their best-ever finish at the tournament with a stunning 38-37 win against the USA. They now face the hosts Kenya in the fifth-place final at the eight-team event. The Kenyans were 22-16 winners against Hong Kong China, who will now play the USA in the seventh-place play-off.

POOL A: Scotland 26 Uruguay 37
Uruguay started on the front foot in the final match of day three and after Juan Carlos Canessa had missed an early penalty, the full-back gave the scoring pass to Pedro Brum to touch down the first try in only the fifth minute. Canessa converted but missed another presentable penalty before re-finding his range to extend the Uruguayan lead to 10 points at the end of the first quarter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Scotland hit back soon after as Eddie Erskine powered over from close range, but the second row was then sent to the sin bin, allowing Los Teritos to strike again. From the subsequent lineout, Uruguay set a driving maul rumbling towards the line and hooker Maximo Lamelas came up with his side’s second try.

As the time on Erskine’s sin bin ticked down, Los Teritos fly-half Icaro Amarillo produced a booming drop-goal to give his side a 20-7 lead. Scotland ate into that advantage before half-time, Corey Tait profiting from a lineout drive to score before Ben Afshar’s second conversion struck a post and went over.

Uruguay lost hooker Lamelas to a yellow card on the stroke of half-time but despite starting the second half a player light, it was Los Teritos who struck next. Following good work from Guillermo Juan Storace, Canessa fed Juan Gonzalez and the winger held off the attentions of several defenders to score in the right corner.

Tait scored his second try of the match soon afterwards, but Afshar missed the conversion and when Canessa struck a long-range penalty it gave Uruguay a 30-19 lead. Los Teritos lost a second player to the sin bin in the 59th minute as replacement Francisco Garcia was shown a yellow card, and it took Scotland less than a minute to capitalise as Erskine powered over from close range again.

ADVERTISEMENT

Afshar converted to close the gap to four points, but Los Teritos refused to panic and scored again while still playing with 14. The impressive Storace slipped through an attempted tackle from Tait before sprinting over the try line. Canessa converted to give Uruguay an 11-point lead and although he missed a long-range penalty with around 10 minutes to go, they were able to close out a famous victory.

Scotland coach Kenneth Murray said: “Very poor today. Our game management was very poor and didn’t deserve to win the game. We didn’t manage the game well enough, we didn’t exit well enough, we didn’t transfer pressure and win enough territory. And then, when we did get the ball in the right areas we couldn’t keep hold of it, so a whole host of things. A really disappointing performance.”

Related

POOL B: Spain 28 Samoa 10
Spain booked their place in the Trophy final with a scrappy 18-point victory over two-time champions Samoa. In a repeat of the 2016 final, Spain – making only their second appearance at the tournament – started as favourites, having won comfortably against Kenya and Hong Kong China. Samoa, winners in 2011 and 2016, only edged past the same Pool B opposition.

In a largely overcast Kenyan capital, Samoa’s Afa Moleli drilled a penalty from almost halfway to open the scoring. It was Spain, though, who enjoyed most of the early territory and possession but handling errors meant they only had Jacobo Ruiz Marcos’ 10th-minute try and a penalty from fly-half Beau Finnian Peart for a 10-3 lead after the first quarter.

A malfunctioning set-piece meant Samoa struggled to gain a foothold in the game but they were almost back in it on the half-hour mark when Moleli was tackled just short of the line after an intercept took him nearly the length of the field.

On their rare forays into the Spain 22, Samoa too were let down by their final pass and in the 46th minute, Spain made them pay. After a 50-22 kick to touch, No8 Manex Ariceta Maestro emerged from the back of a driving lineout to dive over and make it 15-3. Then, with Samoa starting to get their offloading game going, Spain delivered the killer blow in the 56th minute, breaking clear to send inside centre Daniel Cantanzaro Omati over.

Even when Spain were reduced to 14 players after repeated infringements at the breakdown, Samoa couldn’t take full advantage. A try from replacement Royce Billy Jr Umutaua reduced the deficit, but Samoa followed it up with two careless yellow cards of their own. Spain spurned several more try-scoring opportunities but did add two more penalty kicks to ensure Samoa never got within two converted scores.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
c
carlos 639 days ago

Not only Uruguay beats Scotland, a 6N country, but the USA continuous its ruinous performance in international tournaments by losing to Zimbabwe. The USA rugby performance is getting worse all the time. They are consistent. There should be no reason that such a small country as Uruguay with relatively little rugby tradition can beat Scotland. Something smells bad, and it is not the haggis.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nicholas Brian 9 minutes ago
Springboks coach on why they want Ireland game to be hard

It all started with a seemingly golden opportunity – a high-yield Bitcoin investment. I invested in a cryptocurrency startup that looked promising, but I never imagined it would turn into a nightmare. The platform — slick, well-marketed, and with testimonials from seemingly legitimate investors — promised me a 200% return in two weeks. I invested over 7 Bitcoins, worth nearly $500,000 at the time.  The platform’s customer support became elusive, and eventually the platform disappeared. No access, no updates, no sign of the team – just silence, and my heart sank. I had been scammed. I wasn’t alone. across the country and even internationally, victims of the same scam were reporting similar experiences. Fake trading dashboards, forged gains, withdrawal delays, and ultimately, total disappearance. It was a textbook crypto scam—decentralized, anonymous, and nearly impossible to trace, It was a classic crypto scam – decentralized, anonymous, and virtually untraceable, until I discovered Dexdert Net Pro Recovery. Unlike typical recovery agencies that rely on outdated tracing methods or cold legal tactics, Dexdert Net Pro combines advanced blockchain forensics with cyber intelligence and direct collaboration with cryptocurrency exchanges and law enforcement around the world. To recover stolen digital assets — even in the darkest corners of blockchain, when I reached out, the team at Dexdert started with forensic blockchain tracing, uncovering the maze of mixing services, private wallets, and overseas exchanges used to launder stolen BTC. What set them apart was their real-time AI-driven tracing tool that can follow the most obscure trails on multiple chains. Dexdert tracked my stolen BTC through decentralized mixers and shell accounts and identified a batch of BTC that had recently been converted and stored in dormant wallets connected to an unregulated exchange in Eastern Europe. Dexdert successfully recovered my 7 BTC, worth $500,000  after proving its illicit origin -Today, I am an active advocate for proactive recovery services. Without Dexdert Net Pro Recovery, I would have lost everything. Not only did they track down my Bitcoins, they also busted the entire scam network. If you’ve been scammed, don’t give up – contact a professional like Dexdert Net Pro Recovery before the trial runs out.

CONTACT INFORMATION VIA:

Telegram: (@Dexdertprorecovery) Email: (DexdertNetPro@mail.com) WhatsApp: (‪+1 859 609‑4156‬)

0 Go to comments
J
Julio Langworth 1 hour ago
'Individuals are stepping up': Vern Cotter on Beauden Barrett's influence

In 2024, I received a substantial tax refund, which I saw as a golden opportunity to improve my financial situation. Eager to invest, I became interested in Bitcoin, a digital currency that many believe represents the future of finance. Unfortunately, my excitement led me to a fraudulent company that promised incredible returns on investments. Their persuasive tactics and seemingly legitimate operations drew me in, but it didn’t take long for me to realize that I had been deceived, and my hard-earned money $572,000 had vanished.Feeling devastated and hopeless after losing such a significant amount, I reached out to a friend who had faced a similar ordeal. They recommended a company called GRAYWARE TECH SERVICES , which specializes in recovering lost Bitcoin. Although I was skeptical, my desperation pushed me to contact them for help.From the very first interaction with GRAYWARE TECH SERVICES , I was impressed by their understanding and willingness to help. Their team guided me through the recovery process, providing the support I needed during this challenging time. They explained each step clearly and kept me informed throughout the entire journey. Their dedication rekindled my hope of recovering my lost funds.Thanks to the diligent efforts of GRAYWARE TECH SERVICES , I was able to reclaim my stolen Bitcoin. This experience not only restored my financial situation but also taught me invaluable lessons about the importance of conducting thorough research before making any investments. I now have a solid investment strategy in place and am much more cautious about where I allocate my funds.I want to emphasize the importance of being vigilant in the world of cryptocurrency. While Bitcoin offers tremendous potential as an investment, it also attracts scammers looking to exploit unsuspecting individuals. If you find yourself in a similar situation, I strongly encourage you to seek help from a trustworthy recovery service like GRAYWARE TECH SERVICES .Investing in Bitcoin can be a rewarding venture, but it is crucial to approach it with caution. Always perform comprehensive research and remain skeptical of offers that seem too good to be true,but if fallen victim to scam a GRAYWARE TECH SERVICES is available for you.You can reach them on whatsapp +18582759508, web at ( https://graywaretechservices.com/ )    also on Mail: (contact@graywaretechservices.com)

3 Go to comments
F
Flankly 1 hour ago
How 'misunderstood' Rassie Erasmus is rolling back the clock

Nick - thanks for another good piece.


It’s remarkable that Matt Williams gets so upset about Bomb Squad tactics. He’s not just making recommendations, but getting all sweaty about bench splits. But it’s not really about bench splits. He just does not like forwards, and their role in the game.


I thought this quote was telling:

What about Kitshoff, what happened to his spine in South Africa? Do we know if that is as a result of the scrummaging they are put through?

Ouch. So we are really on a program of reducing scrummaging to reduce spinal injuries? That’s the mission? And based on the statistically significant dataset of one case, a case in which he openly admits that he does not have the details. Regardless, if his goal is to reduce spinal injuries for prop forwards then arguing about bench splits seems like an odd place to start.


It’s not just spinal injuries that he cares about. The risk of paralysis is an important issue, and he raises this too:

I’m a bit of a lone voice but, because of my club-mate Grant Harper (ex-Western Suburbs prop who was paralysed after a collapsed scrum), I’m not shutting up on it.

Injuries are horrible, and paralysis is truly awful. We should absolutely take it very seriously, and diligently implement whatever safety protocols and education programs we can to minimize these things. But we don’t ban skydiving or hang gliding, or crossing the road. Though Williams is not looking to ban rugby, he does seem to be intent on reducing the role of forwards in the game, based on entirely anecdotal data.


It’s hard to tell what it’s all about. He makes this supposed safety case and says that no-one in his echo chamber disagrees with him:

Every time I go out, old forwards and old props go up to me and they say, ‘you’re right’. I’ve never had anyone, apart from a few South Africans – because it’s good for South Africa – say it’s rubbish.

It’s weird that “old props” are hanging around his front door and lobbying him, or maybe he just doesn’t “go out” much. Could it be that all of the hand-wringing about bench splits and scrummaging injuries is really a proxy for something else? Is it possible his issue is not about safety at all?


Well, that is what it seems. For me the truth is in this comment:

Can Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Australia and Argentina compete against South Africa, New Zealand and France if that’s the way the game goes? The answer to that is no.

So, this is the real issue for him. The Bomb Squad tactic is a really good one, and you have to be really good to play against it. Or you should try to de-power it by banning it, wailing about injuries that it supposedly causes (it doesn’t) and clutching at anecdotal straws to make your case.


The above quote is an insult to the five countries named, and it also suggests that no-one is going to be smart enough to come up with a game plan that neutralizes the bomb squad or turns it to a relative weakness. Williams is just a noisy fan looking to change the laws to favor his team and his personal tastes.


I agree with your conclusions. This Rassie approach is far from being unfair to backs. Not only does it favor fleet-footed and versatile “skills players” in the double-digit positions, but each individual gets more game time in any given match.


Whenever I go out I get exactly zero “old backs” coming up to me and complaining about the Bomb Squad tactic.


Bravo, Rassie.

196 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The Champions' Cup - a paradise lost? The Champions' Cup - a paradise lost?
Search