Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rugby Australia on high alert as major broadcaster goes on 'cost-cutting measures' in sports rights

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Rugby Australia has been given a scare just as negotiations for the next rights cycle start with current rights holder Foxtel announcing it will be undergoing cost-cutting to its sports budget, according to a report by the Sydney Morning Herald.

ADVERTISEMENT

After Foxtel shelled out record-deals to secure other sports like the NRL and a ground-breaking billion dollar deal for the cricket, how much left over for rugby had been widely questioned as the code struggled for relevance and Australian teams performed poorly in the flagship Super Rugby product over the last few years.

In a market statement, ASX listed Newscorp, the parent company of Foxtel, advised investors they would be cutting spending on ‘non-marquee sporting content’ after a financial loss of $417 million in 2018 and the need to refinance $US1.68 billion in debt. The sports that Foxtel has shelled out megabucks for haven’t driven a significant uplift in subscribers according to the Sydney Morning Herald.  

With rugby union a niche footballing code behind AFL and NRL, they could well fall under the ‘non-marquee’ bucket. The A-League football rights deal doesn’t expire for another three years until 2022/23, putting rugby under the spotlight. It is understood that negotiations have been ‘constructive’ so far.

The broadcasting revenue is a significant income stream for each union and even a reduction in the previous price would have serious implications for Rugby Australia. Having the current rights holder reduce it’s bid or pull out of the equation altogether could have catastrophic implications for the game. Many high-profile stars could likely to find their next asking price wanting with a seriously reduced Rugby Australia budget.

Scott Johnson on Israel Folau:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 8 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

221 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT