Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Rennie breaks silence on Kerr-Barlow switch

By AAP
(Photo by Michael Steele/Getty Images)

The bold plan by former All Blacks scrum-half Tawera Kerr-Barlow to switch allegiance to the Wallabies has been welcomed by Australian coach Dave Rennie. Currently based in France, the 32-year-old half-back told RugbyPass earlier this year that he wanted to play for his birth country, a call that he reiterated this week during a pre-season interview at La Rochelle. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Kerr-Barlow was born in Melbourne and grew up in Darwin with his mother Gail a half-back for the Wallaroos in the mid-1990s. He moved to Hamilton in New Zealand when he was 13 and after resisting overtures from Australian rugby he went on to play 29 Tests for the All Blacks, helping them to lift the 2015 Rugby World Cup.

His former Chiefs coach Rennie said on Thursday that Kerr-Barlow had recently reached out about playing for the Wallabies. World Rugby’s eligibility laws have been eased to allow players to make an international switch after 36 months of inactivity although they must have been born in or have ancestry in the transfer country.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I had a conversation with him when he rang up just to say that if we got under any pressure, if there are injuries… he is born in Australia, a former All Black, but the change of rules makes him eligible,” explained Rennie on Thursday after naming his Wallabies side to take on the Springboks this Saturday.

Under national selection requirements, Kerr-Barlow would need to commit to an Australian Super Rugby side to be available but Rennie said it was positive that he wanted to don the gold jersey. “He is a great man, a hell of a player and you have got a guy who is a former All Black putting his hand up to play for Wallabies, that is a good sign,” continued Rennie.

Related

While the move is flattering, the coach felt the Wallabies were well-covered at nine with Nic White, Tate McDermott, Jake Gordon part of the current squad. “We will be loyal to the guys we have got, it’s probably our strongest position. 

“We got three excellent nines here and Ryan Lonergan behind that, but as we have seen this year things can change quickly so I will certainly keep in contact with Tawera. It’s a hell of a resource in behind what we have already got.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Rennie was asked whether there would be any resistance from World Rugby with the rule change intended for emerging nations. Ex-Wallabies star Israel Folau has already taken advantage, now playing for Tonga. “That is open to debate but once you open the floodgates it’s available for everyone I’d say,” said Rennie.

All Blacks coach Ian Foster wasn’t comfortable with the ground-breaking move with Kerr-Barlow looking to become the first player to switch between two tier-one nations. “It’s just a consequence of World Rugby’s eligibility laws. It kind of doesn’t feel right to me, but rules are rules and he’s entitled.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 7 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

21 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Alex Mitchell: Saints 'are in a very good place at the moment' Alex Mitchell: Saints 'are in a very good place at the moment'
Search