Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Quelle surprise? French not surprised by RWC decision and here's why

France Rugby World Cup 2023 bid leader Claude Atcher

France had the best 2023 Rugby World Cup bid and their success should not come as a surprise, according to the man who spearheaded the nation’s campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many were surprised by Wednesday’s announcement that the tournament would be heading to France, when South Africa had been considered favourites.

But French bid leader Claude Atcher was confident the European country had it in the bag, with Ireland also posing stiff competition.

“We had a good product,” said Atcher in quotes reported by L’Equipe. “And it was said from the beginning; the French application is good. 

“We were accused of a lot of things – ‘you are arrogant, you think you are the best’. But as in the field, you come to play thinking that you will win. 

“Yes, we said we were the best and we built around that. We took the five criteria [vision and hosting concept, organisation and schedule, infrastructure, venues and host cities, and finances] of World Rugby and worked on it. 

“But that’s not enough. We must show it, this product, to the federations that vote. So we went around the world. We presented our file in 18 countries. And we managed to convince. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“After that, you have to secure the voices, because South Africa and Ireland also had a very good record. That said, at the end, I’m not totally surprised by the vote

Sports minister Laura Flessel added: “This victory comes to reward the quality of the French application, which has been able to take full advantage of the 2007 men’s World Cup and the 2014 Women’s World Cup on our soil.

“Their impact has allowed the development of amateur rugby, as well as the media interest in this sport in France.”

France received 18 votes in the first round to South Africa’s 13, with Ireland’s hopes ending after they only secured eight votes.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa only received 15 votes in the second round to France’s 24.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUOmdoEhZfw

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT