Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

John Mitchell's departure a 'done deal' as Bulls search for next coach

By RugbyPass

Former All Black coach John Mitchell will return to the England fold by next month. Mitchell’s departure from the Bulls is a ‘done deal’.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rugby365 have confirmed that the Blue Bulls Company is already ‘shopping around’ for a new Super Rugby coach.

England wants Mitchell to report for duty by next month.

England coach Eddie Jones is looking for a new defence coach, after Paul Gustard left for Harlequins – following the June Test series against the Springboks.

While the Rugby Football Union has remained mum on reports that Mitchell – the Blue Bulls’ Executive of Rugby – will replace Gustard, the BBC has confirmed that ‘interest has been shown’ in the New Zealander’s services.

Video Spacer

Mitchell is under contract to the Bulls till October next year, but the RFU would be prepared to pay a massive ‘buy-out fee’ to the BBC.

Rugby365 have now revealed that calls have already gone out to the agents of some of South Africa’s leading coaches.

A source close to the Pretoria-based franchise told Rugby365 that those calls would not have gone out if Mitchell was not departing.

ADVERTISEMENT

The leading candidates – or at least the names at the top of the Bulls’ wishlist – include Springbok legends Fourie du Preez and Victor Matfield, both World Cup winners and long-time Bulls servants.

Other names on the ‘wanted’ list include Jimmy Stonehouse and John Dobson.

Stonehouse has close links with the Bulls – from his days as a teacher at Hoërskool Waterkloof, the Bulls Cravenweek team and Pretoria Harlequins. He has just returned from a three-year stint at the Brave Lupus in Japan.

Dobson, a born-and-bred Capetonian, is coach of the defending champion Western Province Currie Cup team.

ADVERTISEMENT

Stonehouse, if anybody is to overtake Matfield and Du Preez in the pecking order, would be the most likely candidate.

The BBC, while confirming that interest was shown in Mitchell’s services, said no formal offer has been received from the RFU.

Mitchell has an extensive coaching resume – starting with Fraser Tech in New Zealand in 1994 and includes Ireland (forwards coach), Sale Sharks, England (forwards coach), London Wasps, Waikato B, Chiefs, New Zealand (All Blacks), Waikato, Western Force, Lions, United States and Bulls.

@rugby365com

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE NOW - Singapore SVNS Day 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 10 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search