Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

It is a closed competition - Six Nations chief dashes Georgia's hopes

Action from Georgia v Namibia at the 2015 Rugby World Cup

Georgia’s ambitions to feature in future editions of the Six Nations appear a distant prospect after the competition’s chief executive John Feehan said “there is no vacancy”.

Italy’s two heavy defeats against Wales and Ireland to open their 2017 tournament have raised doubts about the Azzurri’s ability to remain competitive.

Georgia – above Italy in the world rankings – are widely considered to be front of the queue to replace Italy or become an additional seventh team should the opportunity arise.

On Saturday, Georgia’s representative on the World Rugby council, George Nijaradze, insisted his nation was ready to enter the Six Nations, but any hopes seem short-lived after Feehan’s comments.

“It is a closed competition, owned and controlled by the six unions concerned,” he told the Daily Mail.

“There is no vacancy. Right now we are perfectly happy that we have the six strongest teams in Europe in our competition.

“Are we closed to every scenario? No, but it takes a while to see a convincing argument – 10 or 15 years. We have to take a good, considered view about what is right for our six unions.

“They would all have to agree that this is what they want. At this stage, talk of bringing in other teams is premature.

“World Rugby have no input into this tournament,. They have no control over it, no ownership of it. It’s not theirs to tell us what to do with it.

“It is World Rugby’s job to develop the game. Our job is to run the Six Nations as we see fit. Do the unions have a responsibility to help develop and expand the game? Probably, yes, but should that go as far as messing with the most important tournament? Probably not.

“Our primary role is not to develop other unions but if we can help, we do.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT