Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Gloucester lock Ed Slater banned for 4 games

(Photo by Bob Bradford/CameraSport via Getty Images)

Ed Slater has been banned for four weeks after he was cited following the Gloucester defeat by Sale in last weekend’s feisty Gallagher Premiership clash at Kingsholm. The forward was cited by independent citing commissioner John Byett for dangerous play in a ruck or maul, contrary to World Rugby law 9.20 when he collided with Sale’s Akker van der Merwe. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Gloucester lock Slater accepted the charge and was given a four-week suspension by an independent disciplinary panel comprising Gareth Graham (chair) with Martyn Wood and Guy Lovgreen. 

He will be free to play again on February 2 after missing the Premiership games against Newcastle this Saturday and against Northampton on January 30, along with the European matches at Ulster on January 16 and at home to Lyon the following Saturday.  

Video Spacer

Goodbye 2020!

Video Spacer

Goodbye 2020!

The ten-page short-form written verdict from the hearing stated: “The panel made the following brief findings of fact on the balance of probabilities – 

1. There was a deliberate attempt by the player [Slater] to clear the Sale player out of the ruck;
2. The Sale player was jackling for the ball with his head and neck exposed;

3. The player made no attempt to wrap his right arm; instead, he dropped his right arm and used his shoulder to make direct contact with the Sale player;
4. The initial contact was between the player’s right shoulder and the right-hand side of the Sale player’s head and/or neck, before moving down towards the shoulder;
5. The contact was forceful and caused the Sale player to fall backwards. However, no lasting injury was caused as a result of that contact.”

In reaching a decision, the panel added: “The player admitted that he had committed an act of foul play contrary to law 9.20, in that this was a reckless act of dangerous play in a ruck or maul that passed the red card threshold.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In light of the player’s admission, and in light of the evidence with which it had been provided, the panel had no hesitation in finding the matter proven. Although it was denied by the player, the panel concluded that there had in fact been contact with the Sale player’s head and/or neck.”

The four-week ban for Slater was one week more than the three-week suspension given to Sale’s Dan du Preez for the incident he was involved in later in the same match.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 2 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Black Richie Mo'unga makes statement on return from bereavement All Black Mo'unga makes major statement on return from bereavement
Search