Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Fickou comparison has England believing in Manu Tuilagi the winger

(Photo by David Rogers/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Eddie Jones has defended his surprise selection of Manu Tuilagi on the England right wing to face Australia on Saturday, comparing the tactical switch to what France did last year when they opted to select regular midfielder Gael Fickou on their wing. The 30-year-old Tuilagi has only started once previously on the Test level wing in his 38 starts for England – a June 2014 selection in the No14 jersey by Stuart Lancaster against the All Blacks in Dunedin.

ADVERTISEMENT

All other 37 starts that Tuilagi has made for England have been at midfield but Jones’ determination to try out the new ten/twelve combination of Marcus Smith and skipper Owen Farrell at international level for the first time prompted some outside-the-box thinking from the coach.

Tuilagi has combined excellently at inside centre with his midfield partner Henry Slade in last weekend’s win over Tonga and rather than simply demote Tuilagi on the basis that Farrell had come out of isolation following his false-positive virus test and was available to play at No12, Jones opted to keep the Sale midfield in his starting selection by finding a spot for him on the wing at the expense of Adam Radwan.

Video Spacer

Finn Russell on fighting water boys, facing the Springboks and expensive watches

Video Spacer

Finn Russell on fighting water boys, facing the Springboks and expensive watches

Jones was initially hesitant to elaborate much on his selection gambit with Tuilagi at Thursday’s team announcement media briefing. The conversation initially went like this:

MEDIA: How much have you seen of Manu on the wing?
JONES: Enough.
M: How much in training?
EJ: Enough.
M: All week, two weeks?
EJ: Enough.
M: What does that mean?
EJ: Well, all I need to see, mate, is enough. As I said the players will mix and match to their strengths. We believe that is the best backline to play against Australia.
M: What is he like under the high ball?
EJ: We mightn’t have to worry about the high ball too much against Australia.
M: You don’t think they will kick that much?
EJ: Well, if they do kick we have got other blokes who are really good under the high ball.

Later asked if there was a comparable situation to his decision to pick regular England midfielder Tuilagi on the Test wing, Jones replied. “Look I’d be clutching for straws there, mate. All I see is a powerful player who is probably in the best condition of his career. He will add to the ballplayers we have inside to finish off the movements that we have.

“He will be able to roam on the field, he will be able to play like a second centre or a third centre. I think last season Fickou played on the wing for France and was outstanding and the game (against Australia) lends itself to another powerhouse centre so we are looking forward to seeing him play there.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We decided we would pick the best players and the players will mix and match on the field a little bit to their strengths and we believe that this is the best backline for this game… As I said we are going to mix and match. I have seen him play on the wing and he can handle twelve, 13, 11, 14, probably not 15 but he can handle all those positions with aplomb and he is in the best condition of his career.

“We want to use each player to their strengths and that is why we have picked this particular backline to complement a strong forward pack. We realise that Australia is going to ask a lot of questions.”

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

   

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 1 hour ago
Eben Etzebeth staring at huge ban after another red card

Well… I'd say the modern Boks are not a particularly violent team but it's impossible to getaway with much violence on an international rugby field now. The Boks of yesteryear were at times brutal. Whether or not the reputation is justified, they do have that reputation amongst a lot of rugby fans.

As for point 2.. it's a tricky one, I don't want to slander a nation here. I'm no “Bok hater”, but I've gotta say some Bok fans are the most obnoxious fans I've personally encountered. Notably this didn't seem to be a problem until the Boks became the best in the world. I agree that fans from other nations can be awful too, every nation has it's fair share of d-heads but going on any rugby forum or YouTube comments is quite tedious these days owing to the legions of partisan Bok fans who jump onto every thread regardless of if it's about the Boks to tell everyone how much better the Boks are than everyone else. A Saffa once told me that SA is a troubled country and because of that the Boks are a symbol of SA victory against all odds so that's why the fans are so passionate. At least you recognise that there is an issue with some Bok fans, that's more than many are willing to concede. Whatever the reason, it's just boring is all I can tell you and I can say coming from a place of absolute honesty I encounter far, far more arrogance and obnoxious behaviour from Bok fans than any other fanbase - the kiwis were nothing like this when they were on top. So look much love to SA, I bear no hatred of ill will, I just want to have conversations about rugby without being told constantly that the Boks are the best team in the world and all coaches except Rassie are useless etc



...

205 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT