Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Elevator moment convinced Rokocoko about 'rugby scientist' Schmidt

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Legendary All Blacks winger Joe Rokocoko has recalled the seminal elevator moment that convinced him that Joe Schmidt – Ian Foster’s new New Zealand team selector – was the real deal as a coach. Long before Smokin’ Joe blazed a trail on the Test level scene, winning 68 caps in a try-heavy international career between 2003 and 2010, he initially worked as a player under Schmidt at U18s age-grade level. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Schmidt himself has come a long way since then, helping Clermont and Leinster to win club trophies before going on to win three Six Nations titles with Ireland, including the 2018 Grand Slam. He is now officially part of the All Blacks set-up, taking over as a selector from Grant Fox and helping formulate overall strategy and attack play as well as providing analysis on opposition teams for Foster. 

It is a change that Rokocoko has welcomed, the ex-prolific All Blacks scorer explaining his rapport with Schmidt from way back. “I know Joe very well,” he told the latest edition of Midi Olympique, the French rugby newspaper

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“He was my coach with the New Zealand U18s and then with the Auckland Blues. He is a remarkable technician, very attached to the basic gestures of the rugby player. When I was young, he spent hours detailing the angles of the strikes, the degrees of orientation of these… Joe Schmidt, he is a rugby scientist.”

Asked to elaborate, Rokocoko added: “One day when I took the elevator with him when I was playing for the Blues, he used the floor numbers to detail to me the movements he wanted to work on, which areas to attack during the weekend and how to achieve it… He is incredibly smart but he demands real technical perfection from his players. Some make it, some don’t.”

Related

Rokocoko watched the recent series defeat for the All Blacks against Ireland while on holiday in Fiji. Asked why they were beaten 1-2, he suggested: “The spiral is negative, the All Blacks remain on four defeats in the last five games… 

“The body language of the players does not deceive, they are sorely lacking in confidence. Moreover, the attack game is not varied enough and faced with these increasingly better-organised defences, these movements, which worked until now, no longer work. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“The comparison with the Irish launches was also very unfavourable to New Zealand, so maybe the change of coaches will change all that… I don’t know.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE NOW - Singapore SVNS Day 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 10 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search