Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sale boss not sold on Eddie Jones' outrageous Ben Curry position change request

Eddie Jones wants Ben Curry to be a 9.

Eddie Jones believes Sale flanker Ben Curry, twin brother of Tom, could become an international scrumhalf but the Gallagher Premiership club have no intention of handing him the role ahead Faf de Klerk, their World Cup-winning Springbok No9.

ADVERTISEMENT

Steve Diamond, the Sale director of rugby whose side face La Rochelle in the Heineken Cup tomorrow night, confirmed Jones had raised the possibility of Curry, 6ft ins and 16st 7lbs, being a potential scrumhalf option, however, he will be wearing the No.7 jersey in France with his twin brother getting a break after his World Cup heroics.

Diamond is happy to move players around his back division, including England wing Chris Ashton, but the concept of turning Curry into a No9 appears to be a step too far.

The Sale boss is hoping to see both Curry boys named in Jones’s Six Nations squad as backrow forwards next week and told RugbyPass: “Eddie Jones approached me last year and said he believed Ben Curry could make it as an international No9. I didn’t take it too seriously because he does like to find people to do different roles and last year there was the talk about Jack Nowell (Exeter wing) playing in the back row.

Video Spacer

“I don’t know if Eddie is intending to do that with Ben but I would suggest that his best position is going to be openside flanker. However, if the England gurus, who are far more experienced than me, think like that then let them pick him at scrumhalf and we will take the money off the RFU!”

Diamond has never seen Curry play scrumhalf as the 21-year-old stopped operating in the backs for his school team when he reached Year Eight which makes a return to the position even tougher, although the club has fuelled debate by posting a picture of a No.9 Sale jersey with B. Curry on the back.

Diamond added: “If Eddie spoke to me and could give us some good reasons then we would have to think about it. But, if we thought Ben could challenge Faf de Klerk in his position we would be moving Ben because I play Luke and Sam James at centre and full back and Chris Ashton and Denny Solomona at wing and full back. I am happy to have hybrid players but I don’t know if at the top of the game a forward can become a back and we remember what happened when Bergamasco (Italy flanker) played scrumhalf. It didn’t make him look good at all.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Until the squad is picked we won’t know how they are thinking and if he gets in then that will be fantastic but we don’t want him to be in as a mascot. I would be surprised if he got in as a scrumhalf and would be very interested to attend the training sessions. Ben is a really good lad who just wants to play every week and we have to manage his expectation on that.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 26 minutes ago
Everyone knows Robertson is not supposed to be doing the coaching

Yeah it’s not actually that I’m against the idea this is not good enough, I just don’t know whos responsible for the appalling selections, whether the game plan will work, whether it hasn’t worked because Razor has had too much input or too little input, and whether were better or worse for the coachs not making it work against themselves.

I think that’s the more common outlook rather than people panicking mate, I think they just want something to happen and that needs an outlet. For instance, yes, we were still far too good for most in even weaker areas like the scrum, but it’s the delay in the coaches seemingly admitting that it’s been dissapoint. How can they not see DURING THE GAME it didn’t go right and say it? What are they scared of? Do they think the estimation of the All Blacks will go down in peoples minds? And of course thats not a problem if it weren’t for the fact they don’t do any better the next game! And then they finally seem to see and things get better. I’ve had endless discussions with Chicken about what’s happening at half time, and the lack of any real change. That problem is momentum is consistent with their being NO progress through the year. The team does not improve. The lineout is improved and is good. The scrum is weak and stays weak. The misfires and stays misfiring. When is the new structure following Lancasters Leinster going to click?



...

33 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT