Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Destroying the flawed assumptions with the Springboks' loss to Ireland

By Ben Smith
Faf de Klerk of South Africa doesnt convert their kick after being awarded a penalty, after the ball hits the post, during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between South Africa and Ireland at Stade de France on September 23, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

Cue the conspiracy theories popping up left, right and centre that we didn’t see the ‘true’ Springboks against Ireland and they were holding back.

ADVERTISEMENT

There are questions over the decisions to kick for goal over kicking for the corner when they had 15 forwards in the line up to maul.

There are also suggestions that the Springboks “left” 11 points out on the field.

Both are fallacy with flawed logic that becomes clear when you take into account the game situation and how events unfolded.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The Springboks are notorious for taking the three points when available particularly in a tight contest where points are at a premium.

There was nothing suspicious about the intent to take points, which the match situation demanded they do so.

Faf de Klerk’s first long-range attempt came with the Boks down 7-3 early in the second half.

Jasper Wiese managed to pin an Irish ball carrier and win a holding on penalty for the Springboks just inside their own half. In that six minutes to start the second half they had no possession and were forced to manage an exit situation.

The traffic lights came on from the coaches box to signal a shot at goal. The chance to make it a one point game at 7-6 after a period of play where Ireland had most of the running was irresistible.

ADVERTISEMENT

They ended up in possibly a better situation than kicking for the corner as the ball hit the post and was recovered by Eben Etzebeth about eight metres out.

Ireland defend for multiple phases before Etzebeth rides the chairlift and is lifted up by James Lowe. Other Irish defenders come in, hold him up, and force a collapsed maul turnover.

At that exact moment, the Springboks unload the 7-1 bench to inject fresh meat for the defensive scrum on Ireland’s five. Both locks, Etzebeth and Franco Mostert sub out, No 8 Wiese also leaves with one front rower Kitshoff.

The decision and timing is a masterstroke.

ADVERTISEMENT

They turn the screws on Ireland’s feed, win a penalty, call another scrum and Cheslin Kolbe scores their first try. The unpredictable back-and-forth sequence of events ends up in South Africa’s favour massively.

Here is the kicker: if De Klerk makes the penalty kick then Kolbe’s try doesn’t eventuate. The field position and the scrum platform for the try all come from De Klerk’s penalty hitting the post.

Instead of three points they end up with five, but the narrative in the final wash is that we can add back De Klerk’s missed three to the end total plus Libbok’s conversion. Madness.

If you want to add the potential for three back, please subtract five first, and then cancel out the potential for two more from Libbok’s miss as conversions don’t occur without tries.

So already the narrative that the Springboks left 11 points on the field doesn’t hold any weight. They end up in a worse position if De Klerk makes the first penalty.

Related

South Africa’s next penalty attempt at goal came with Ireland up 10-8 after Sexton reclaimed the lead with a regulation kick at goal.

A knock-on by De Allende led to an Irish scrum 40 metres out from their line on the angle. Again another fierce shove by South Africa at the scrum wins a penalty against the feed.

This was the most make-able kick of them all but unfortunately Libbok missed it, shaving the left upright.

Consider the decision-making of taking the shot in this situation.

Would you kick to the corner down by two points with 17 minutes remaining, or take a chance from 40 metres out and 15 metres in to take the lead by 11-10?

It is very reasonable to assume they would want to take the lead and a penalty would do that.

After Libbok’s missed penalty, Ireland clear the ball away downfield from a 22 restart. Kwagga Smith returns the restart near halfway and Ireland are penalised on the very next phase for being offside, leading to De Klerk’s second long-range attempt.

This comes directly from the sequence of play after Libbok’s penalty miss, less than 30 seconds apart. They don’t get the second chance to kick for goal if the first one is made.

If De Klerk made his first long-range attempt, cancelling out the Kolbe try, and Libbok made his penalty, the score would hypothetically be 10-9 in Ireland’s favour.

South Africa don’t kick for goal for the remainder of the game and would still lose but by 13-9.

However, this is an impossible assumption as the sequence of match events has already diverged from our realised sequence of what happened.

Questions were asked why the Springboks changed tact and starting kicking for the corner to go for the maul at the end of the game.

There is only one questionable roll of dice when the score is 10-8 after Pieter-Steph du Toit is tackled near the sideline and the ball is forced out.

Ireland are judged to have ripped it out of Du Toit’s hands and South Africa are awarded the throw.

The Springboks attempt a rolling maul and win a penalty, but turn down a third penalty shot out wide in favour of another maul since they are already in the corner.

This was the first tactical change with faith in the maul greater than their place kickers. There was 10 minutes remaining.

Flanker-turned-hooker Deon Fourie’s throw is not straight and the miscue hands Ireland a scrum. The Springboks give away a short-arm penalty and Ireland escape out of the situation.

Ireland then got ahead by five points, time was running out with three minutes remaining and the Springboks were then forced to chase seven points if they wanted to win.

There is nothing suspect about the way South Africa tried to manage the game and the decisions they made. It was by-the-book of how they would be expected to handle those situations in any other Test.

They tried to kick goals when they arose and when that didn’t work they tried to maul and failed. It is as simple as that.

There is no scenario in which the Springboks making their goals automatically leads to a reversal of the result.

Trying to twist the outcome match with revisionist possibilities is fraught with folly and in this case doesn’t add up to 11 extra points for the Springboks.

All we can say is Ireland won 13-8 and South Africa missed their chances to win, end of.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

USER NOTICE:

As of today you will need to reset your password to log into RugbyPass to continue commenting on articles.

Please click the ‘Login’ button below to be redirected and start the account validation and password reset process.

Thank you,

Comments

61 Comments
B
BoerBok 298 days ago

Irish won fair and square, boks threw all they had in but ireland was too good. Am sure they kissed that Blarney stone before the game. Ireland goes in hot favourites against NZ in the quaters. May the best team win!

C
Colin 299 days ago

Pure suppososition again! The best team on the day won. Simple!

R
Rouan 299 days ago

Ireland going to knock out those powder puff All Blacks in the quarter final it’s coming

L
Liam 299 days ago

The point of the questions is based on the comparison with the Twickenham game against the abs where they didn't take the shots, built pressure and got abs in the bin and then scored tries. And the fact they hardly bothered to maul until the end and if you take all your shots you can't lineout maul on the line.

Geez you write some rubbish these days ben

J
John 299 days ago

The bokke have proven their pedigree on this stage. Ireland have progressed but never proven themselves when it counts. I (american) reflect on this fixture as very far from showing either side's superiority this year. Ireland kicked well and SA kicked poorly in a match decided by mere foot points. looking forward to the next.

Ben, you were somewhat partial in your writing. Your eagerness to defend the match from "woulda coulda" narratives ignored the clear superiority of the South Africans on the touchline and in the scrum.

Looking forward to seeing how this matchup plays out and if you will own your misunderstanding of these nuances next month.

B
Brad 299 days ago

"All we can say is Ireland won 13-8 and South Africa missed their chances to win, end of" - pretty much what every Saffer is saying.

Honestly, Ben, you need help.

r
rory 299 days ago

Nigel you beaut

r
rory 299 days ago

Not meant for you David but Nigel who I think is related to Ben Smith

r
rory 299 days ago

If you look at the photo of Ben Smith he must have been a beautiful baby. And like the poem suggests his parents most likely kept him from children who were rough. Understandably! The issue is, he has stayed a very pretty little baby boy and therein lies the rub.

P
PaPaRumple 300 days ago

It's so funny cause when I see these articles on my phone news feed before I even open them I can tell it's Ben Smith writing them. The hate and envy in his titles give it away.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

TRENDING
TRENDING Ireland and All Blacks to renew rivalry overseas again - report Ireland and All Blacks to renew rivalry overseas again - report
Search