The Lab: Building an explosive set-piece attack with the NFL’s ‘Trips Bunch’ concept
The Lab is an explorative look at left-field rugby strategies dreamed up by @bensmithrugby. Many of these may not work in practice but the idea is to think creatively and create something new to think about.
A lucrative set-piece attack always has intricate play design, multiple moving parts, attention to detail and players who have mastered the intricacies of their interlinking roles.
The best back lines can unlock defences in one move, changing a game in an instant with a first phase strike.
Set-piece philosophy varies team-by-team and by field position, many prefer the simplest of crash plays to restart phase play, whilst some will attack wide from the same spot.
Taking a fresh look at set-piece play, could we build a set-piece scrum attack by taking inspiration from the NFL’s ‘Trips Bunch’ formation?
https://giphy.com/gifs/wIbv56oK6fSnO2SdoH
The ‘trips bunch’ concept refers to three receivers bunched in a tight formation to one side prior to the snap.
The receivers start tight and scramble in a variety of different directions. The formation creates alignment troubles – many of the crossing routes used by the bunch make it impossible for defenders to play man-to-man coverage.
If they do play man coverage, the tight proximity between players can cause collisions amongst the defenders once the play begins, creating separation and easy completions for the receivers.
Could we use this concept to schematically create space and manipulate back line defence? There are similar advantages we can achieve by doing so.
A ‘trips bunch’ in rugby will be most effective outside 10, using the 12, 13 and 15 in a tight triangle on a big open side, while using the playmaking skills of a flyhalf to pull the strings. One of the key features is taking your fullback from the wide channel and dropping him into the midfield.
The tight formation of three possible options outside 10 causes alignment issues for the midfield defence straight away.
Do they tighten up to achieve body-on-body alignment?
It is most likely they won’t. If they do, they will leave acres of space to be exploited by the cross-field kick to the open side winger (14), or the blind side winger (11) can pop off the 10’s shoulder through the 10-12 channel.
The pre-play formation causes the same problems in rugby as the NFL, forcing the defence to play zone coverage rather than man, with defenders covering space rather than a particular player, illustrated below.
As the play unfolds, the midfield defenders will have to decide which man to take on the fly, which can lead to confusion, poor decisions, and disconnection between defenders. They will have to read-and-react in a split second correctly, and the more complexity we can add, the harder this will be to do.
Most of the plays run out of this formation will be two pass plays, one from 9 to 10 and one from the 10 to any of his options.
The flyhalf will need to progress through multiple reads at speed and possess the necessary playmaking ability, requiring courage to play flat and late and the nous to throw the right pass.
The ‘trips bunch’ would expand on this type of two-pass play design.
On this example, the 10 has three possible options, a blind winger popping off his outside shoulder and his two centres running crossing lines. He hits his 13 on a fade line, making the correct read and targeting the space for a set-piece try.
https://giphy.com/gifs/TIxea0cK1qWFUsMPJH
With a ‘trips bunch’, he would have even more to process, with the three in the bunch and a fourth possible ‘joker’, the blindside winger, that you could potentially work in anywhere as a late option, but best used in a similar fashion as above.
The presence of the blindside winger keeps the defending 12 interested, if he slides towards the bunch early the 10 has an easy option to play a 2-on-1 with a short pop pass to 11.
This means the prime opportunity to attack is using the bunch against the defending centre-wing partnership.
Moving the fullback into the midfield attack setup is a game-changer. We can now target the defending centre-wing channel with three players all at once, forcing them to make multiple reads. Theoretically, one of the bunch will always be open if the 12 doesn’t slide.
Often when play reaches the fullback in the wide channel, the defence is able to slide out when inside runners don’t commit defenders. This leads to nice gains for the attack but is usually shut down at some point. Here we just use numbers directly in short space to achieve an advantage in search of a big play.
The defenders have to make front-on heads-up reads, but most of them have no pre-play alignment, meaning they will move forward and some degree laterally left or right.
Our backs in the trips formation will need to be expert line runners, with sharp footwork and off-the-mark acceleration. The longer they can hold a tight formation before quickly dispersing, the more effective the play will be.
A dynamic fullback like Will Jordan could wreak havoc in a playbook like this, with his ability to explode onto the ball quickly.
https://giphy.com/gifs/239b1rT9TunJ8oa7u4
Watch how he goes from a walking start to cut Counties Manukau open with a perfectly timed ‘unders’ line. Two steps and he is into his run, stutter-stepping to avoid overrunning it before hitting full stride shortly after the catch. The ‘bunch’ would need to run lines in a similar fashion.
https://giphy.com/gifs/1qYGsCP2S0j3ZIv99L
Fullbacks like Jordan, Stuart Hogg and Jordan Larmour in combination with centres like Garry Ringrose could flourish with these plays.
Here are some line combinations you could use to target the centre and wing channel. The white line is the underneath route and the third read on the play.
Here below is two variations of a ‘splinter’ route combination to target the wing specifically. The 12 runs a simple line to hold the 13 while the two other backs target the wing outside and inside. Who goes over and who goes under can be changed up as desired.
You could also implement multiple crossing lines and try and find a way to get your blind side winger involved as a late delayed option.
Of course, the success would always be determined by the vision and decision-making of the 10, tasked with picking the right option, and how well the backs nail down the timing and cohesion.
Leinster and Ireland already run similar ‘bunch’ formations from set-piece although these typically seem to be from the lineout, where they can involve loose forwards.
However, these plays typically have more than two passes, with Sexton playing an early role but handing the final playmaking duties over to someone else to make the decisive pass.
The ‘trips bunch’ concept here is an option-read system built specifically for the 10 to make the play, with the experimental element of taking your fullback and using him in the midfield to create a numbers advantage.
It would take hours of perfection to take this from ‘the Lab’ onto the training paddock but with a stable of explosive backs, it could be a fruitful adoption of an NFL concept. It would be fascinating to see what combination of lines works best from the bunch and how defences would ultimately react to try and combat the formation.
Have you seen this or used this concept already? Send your feedback to @bensmithrugby on Twitter.
Comments on RugbyPass
A great game. The Sharks without Etsebeth are a shadow of the team compared to when he plays. The limitations of Some of the expensive Sharks players are being exposed. Credit to Clermont for some exhilaration play at times.
3 Go to comments100% Mr Owens. But who would want to be a referee.? It must be the most difficult job on earth.
1 Go to commentsStarts to be overdone and oversold this systematic SA narrative…which nevertheless has the merit in this case to recognise blatant refereeing mistakes in their favor
3 Go to commentsNice article. Shades of Steinbeck. They can win the final if they take the game seriously; but only if they take it seriously.
3 Go to commentsWhat a sad way to end a glittering career. Somebody should tell him to delete his social media accounts and face the consequences of what he's done. Then he should slip away quietly into obscurity. This isn't likely to happen, something tells me he'll be back in The Sun / Daily Mail sooner rather than later.
3 Go to commentsguys its fine! he understands why he did what he did and has taken accountability for it; why should he have to be accountable to a court? after all he did was abuse people in person - its not as if he was engaging in _online_ abuse!
3 Go to commentsChiefs flanker Kaylum Boshier yellow-carded for collapsing the scrum as it rolled towards the line. It was a maul….
1 Go to commentsyou know, i’m a leinster fan so I want Northampton to lose and it is gonna be tuff with Cortney lawes, Alex michell and the other guys🏉 lets go leinster🏉
1 Go to commentsWelcome to the Pro ranks. Those hard teams of old do hit the sole better though. its a dog fight at the top.
6 Go to commentsCan someone fill me in please, I've read a number of Ben Smith articles now and it seems he's got something again South Africa? Surely, this game was over and done with 7 months ago. Can't we have something a bit more interesting and relevant, or is this the calibre of journalist on this site?
228 Go to commentsNot sure what the Welsh are moaning about. They’ve had far more players off England, than England have had off Wales. Guys like Josh Hathaway and Kane James will play for Wales in the end. And they’ll be fsr better players for having played in the Gallagher Premiership, than they ever would have been had they stayed mired in the shambles that is Welsh rugby.
4 Go to commentsThis is all being blown totally out of proportion. First of all, since half the Irish team isn’t Irish - it’s very likely that none of the Irish players said that at all and, thus, we’re not being arrogant. Second, since half the Irish team is Kiwi - it’s very likely the Kiwi players were predicting a NZ SA World Cup final. Which they got spot on. Good on them!
163 Go to commentsAha. An Irishman with logic! Follow the flow: - Ireland peaks with a >80% win record between 2020 and 2023. And then… - crashes out of another QF at the WC; - Beat a poor French Team; - Beat 6N wooden spoonists Italy; - Play shite against eventual wooden spoonists Wales; - Lose against the most boring, “the worst English team ever” , a team widely regarded as unable to attack; - scrape through against Scotland. This article, No - Trimble, is on the money! Except for one glaring statement: _The Springboks have a few aces in the hole in this debate being the reigning world champions and official world number ones_ There is no debate, boys and girls. There it is. In black and white. “Reigning World Champions and OFFICIAL world number ones”. Come July, the overrated Andy Farrell and this overhyped team are going to enter into a world of hurt.
87 Go to commentsI’d like to know what homoerotic events Daniel enjoyed at 8th man. I clearly missed out!
19 Go to commentsThis article is missing some detail, like some actual context or info about what led to him abusing the ref.
2 Go to comments*They used to say that football is a gentleman sport watched by hooligans and rugby is a hooligan sport watched by gentlemen. How times have changed.*
3 Go to commentsexcept ot wasnt late wasnt late at all so dont know why you all saying its late he commits early and its your fault fir not paying attention
30 Go to commentsNot sure the Bulls need another average utility back in their ranks. Chamberlain has been ok for the Sharks but is by no means an X-Factor player. Bulls bought several utility backs which they barely use. A typical example would be Henry Immelman who plays mostly Fullback. The Bulls however have rarely played him this year and he has played wing or centre. Bulls want to build depth but seems like they have too many surplus players
1 Go to commentsABs lost against a side playing without a hooker - The guy playing, had one shoulder. Line outs were a gimme for the ABs, and the last 8 minutes 14 played 14 against a team that had been smashed 3 weeks in a row… Yet with all that possession, with all that territory, with all the advantages they actually had, especially in the last 8 minutes, they couldn’t buy a point. Those last 8 minutes determined if they outplayed the Boks or not. History will show that the Boks completely outplayed the ABs, especially in those last 8 minutes, the business end of any rugby match
228 Go to commentsWould’ve, could’ve, should’ve, didn’t.
228 Go to comments