Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Rugby Australia respond to leaked document demanding Rebels-Moana merge

By Ned Lester
Rugby Australia CEO Phil Waugh speaks to the media. (Photo by Brendon Thorne/Getty Images)

The latest twist in the series of unfortunate events in Australian rugby that has come to light is a 16-page leaked document in which Rugby Australia demands the Melbourne Rebels merge with Super Rugby Pacific counterparts Moana Pasifika.

ADVERTISEMENT

The document, leaked by the Herald Sun, references conversations from midway through 2023 and also notes a potential team from Japan, Hawaii or on the West Coast of the United States that would be added in order to maintain the 12-team structure of Super Rugby Pacific – something New Zealand Rugby CEO Mark Robinson also recently mentioned.

The outlet published details of the leak on Friday, revealing Rugby Australia’s push for action from the club which entered voluntary administration on Monday last week.

“As at 18 July 2023 Rugby Australia was requiring Melbourne team to be known as Rebels Pasifika in its dealing with Rebels, Victorian Government, the British and Irish Lions Tours to Australia in 2025,” the document reads, as reported by the Herald Sun.

The merged club would be based out of Auckland. Rugby Australia’s comments on the leak also featured, with CEO Phil Waugh acknowledging the leak but opting not to respond to it directly.

“Rugby Australia is aware of a document that has been circulated to the media today and is purported to be signed off by the Melbourne Rebels Board and Rugby Victoria,” Waugh said in a statement.

“Our immediate focus and priority is to work through the voluntary administration process diligently and appropriately with the administrator, and to engage with the key stakeholders to ensure that the team can participate in the 2024 Super Rugby competitions.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Given this, we do not intend to respond to the various accusations and assertions within the document.”

Related

RA is yet to come to a resolution on the future of the Australian club, working with the Victorian government and stakeholders on potential solutions while not guaranteeing the Rebels’ future beyond the coming season.

The leaked document also alleges fiery accusations from the Rebels, pointing out misguided financial decisions from RA.

Specifically, Rugby Australia was reportedly called out for overspending on the Rugby World Cup 2023 budget thanks to some upmarket events under then-head coach Eddie Jones, which former RA chair Hamish McLennan admitted pushed into the seven-figure range.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Rebels also reportedly took exception to RA’s management of finances after cutting funding to the Super Rugby franchises by $1.7M during Covid and not reinstating that sum despite acquiring more funds in the years since.

Despite the instability, the Rebels claimed a 38-12 victory over the Waratahs in trial action over the weekend.

“It’s fantastic. It’s the first trial game we’ve won in the last three years,” Rebels General Manager Nick Stiles said.

“With everything else that’s been going on we wanted to come out and make a statement around that.

“We’ve been so confident around the work we’ve been putting into the program for the last few years and I thought today was a reflection of how hard they’ve trained through the preseason and the depth we’ve got in the group.

“It’s only a trial game, but it’s a great starting point.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 7 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

22 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed
Search