Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

France player ratings vs Scotland

By Alex Shaw
GettyImages-1211177567

France’s Guinness Six Nations Grand Slam bid ground to a halt on Sunday, as they fell to a 28-17 loss to a fired up Scottish side at Murrayfield.

ADVERTISEMENT

Indiscipline cost France, who saw two members of their pack sent to the sin bin, one with a yellow card and the other with a red, and Scotland were more than capable of putting Les Bleus to the sword after that.

We have player ratings for all 23 of France’s player below. Do you agree with our assessment?

  1. Anthony Bouthier7

The full-back kept up his impressive debut Six Nations campaign with a solid defensive performance. His positioning in the kicking game and cover work in defence were all noteworthy, whilst he also came close to sparking attacking opportunities for Les Bleus on multiple occasions.

Continue reading below…

Watch: Alun Wyn Jones on what happened with Joe Marler at Twickenham

Video Spacer

  1. Damian Penaud6

The wing took his early try well and was consistently looking for work off of his wing, even when France were reduced to 14 men. His industry helped France not look short in personnel on a number of attacks.

  1. Virimi Vakatawa7

Vakatawa flashed some early promise with his carrying, ability to keep phases alive and his one-on-one tackling in space, but he was restricted in his chances to build on it as the French pack leaked numbers and penalties, losing the battle with their Scottish counterparts in the process. Nevertheless, he found ways to manufacture attacking opportunities.

  1. Arthur Vincent6

The talented centre stepped up as a ball-carrier and pressure valve outside of Mathieu Jalibert, though he was not put in the best position to succeed by the indiscipline of some of his teammates.

  1. Gaël Fickou6

After losing out on a high ball early in the game, Fickou settled his nerves with some incisive carries. As with a number of the backs, his contributions were limited due to the struggles experienced by the French pack.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1236675321849622529?s=20

  1. Romain Ntamack5

The young fly-half’s game was cut short by an early head injury. He missed an early kick at goal and fumbled the high ball in the build-up to tackle in which he sustained the injury, making it a forgettable outing for the prodigy.

  1. Antoine Dupont6

A relatively slow start, which included a kick out on the full, was ended in spectacular fashion as Dupont connected with a wonderfully weighted kick assist for Penaud’s opening try. Unfortunately, he was having to play on the back-foot for much of the second half, though a couple of unusual fumbles did not help his case.

  1. Jefferson Poirot7

The loosehead was solid at the set-piece and put plenty of effort in the loose. He did his best to maintain parity after the French pack was reduced to 14 men. Poirot’s head and work rate did not drop, despite the game drifting away from Les Bleus.

  1. Julien Marchand8

An efficient and effective performance from the hooker, who successfully completed all eight of his lineout throws. He also carried productively, cleaned up loose balls and was able to force turnovers out of Scotland at the breakdown.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1236696528594644993?s=20

  1. Mohamed Haouas3

After a couple of solid scrums, Haouas began to come under pressure from Rory Sutherland. He later put his team in a hole with a punch to the head of Jamie Ritchie, an action which saw him pick up a red card just before the half.

  1. Bernard Le Roux6

One of the form players of the championship, Le Roux didn’t have a bad game at Murrayfield, though it fell below the high standards he has set so far in the tournament. His physicality and work rate still showed up, however, even if they weren’t as influential as they have been in other games over the past month or so.

  1. Paul Willemse4

The lock blotted his copybook with a couple of handling errors and his role in the yellow card that François Cros received. He will not look back favourably on his attempted swatted arm tackle on Chris Harris, either.

  1. François Cros5

Cros picked up an early yellow card that didn’t help his side, whilst he wasn’t able to exert the same kind of physicality or accuracy in defence and at the breakdown on Scotland that he has in previous matches.

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1236691860745334788?s=20

  1. Charles Ollivon6

It was not the polished and all-action performance from Ollivon that we have become used to during this tournament, though he did provide positive impact as a lineout option and in the defensive line.

  1. Grégory Alldritt8

One of the French forwards to leave the game with more credit than he started it with. He carried well as was expected, but also made his presence known at the contact area and with his ability to link play and keep phases alive. Ticked boxes on the kick return and in the defensive line, too.

Replacements

  1. Peato Mauvaka6

Mauvaka kept up the set-piece efficiency that Marchand had laid the foundation for and was busy in the loose, if not quite as productive as the man he replaced on the pitch.

  1. Jean-Baptiste Gros6

Coughed up an unnecessary neck roll penalty shortly after arriving from the bench. The loosehead did do a reasonable job helping negate France’s numerical disadvantage in the scrum, though.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1236669895242366977?s=20

  1. Demba Bamba7

Bamba injected some much-needed energy and positivity in the loose, albeit with some understandable struggles in a seven-man scrum.

  1. Romain Taofifenua7

The lock added a power and dynamism that Willemse had been unable to provide, not to mention a safer pair of hands.

  1. Dylan Cretin6

The flanker was an upgrade for Cros on the day, although his tangible effect on the side was limited to some solid tackles and clear outs at the breakdown.

  1. Baptiste Serinn/a

Came on too late to have a real impact on the game.

  1. Matthieu Jalibert5

An enigmatic performance from the replacement fly-half. He provided attacking spark at times and looked one of the more likely French players to make something happen, though that was mitigated by multiple defensive errors and some struggles with his positioning on the pitch.

  1. Thomas Ramos6

Added some late spark after coming on. It was not enough to turn thing around for France but he’s done his chances of featuring in the future no harm.

Watch: Eddie Jones and Owen Farrell face the media after their win over Wales

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 12 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Chaos': Lawes sheds light on the social that ended 2 England careers 'Chaos': Lawes sheds light on the social that ended 2 England careers
Search