Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

All Blacks prospect reportedly next on NRL's hit list

By Ned Lester
Tyrone Thompson and Josh Kaifa celebrate the Hawkes Bay win. Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images

The NRL’s recently proposed salary cap exemption for rival code talent has reportedly found its first Kiwi target, with Chiefs young gun Tyrone Thompson reportedly receiving interest from his twin brother’s club, the Newcastle Knights.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Thompson twins have each been identified as hugely promising talents in their respective codes, with Leo representing New Zealand in the recent Pacific Championship, and Tyrone earning a Maori All Blacks cap against Ireland before a selection in the 2023 All Blacks XV tour to Japan.

Born in Gisborne, the brothers parted ways in 2020 as Leo moved to Canberra to pursue an opportunity with the Raiders, while Tyrone opted to represent his home province and familiar code in Waikato.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Tyrone has been named in the 2024 Chiefs Super Rugby Pacific squad and has one year remaining on his contract with New Zealand Rugby, but according to a NewsCorp report, may be assessing his options for 2025.

Related

Newcastle’s interest may offer an appealing career move given his brother’s success at the club, having a breakthrough 2023 campaign.

Although, at just 23 and already on the cusp of higher honours, leaving home would undoubtedly be a mammoth sacrifice given an All Blacks jersey may be within reach.

A chunk of cash would help get the athletic young hooker over that loss, and the NRL may be close to greenlighting a rule change that would allow that cash to be offered.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Would salary-cap relief be potentially used? Yes,” NRL chief Andrew Abdo said of his desire to attract “the best athletes.”

“That’s an absolute possibility that the commission will consider, and consider in due course.”

“Any change the commission might make to that policy will have to be very carefully considered, and there will be parameters and caps.

“It won’t be a free-for-all.

“It will be delicate and it will be about making sure there’s an opportunity for all clubs on an equal basis to have one or two talented players that they recruit potentially from other codes around the world.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’ll be carefully considered though, because we do want to make sure that we focus on our pathways, and we also want to maintain competitive balance.”

Thompson will again play understudy to Samisoni Taukei’aho in 2024, but with the Chiefs primed for another dominant Super Rugby Pacific season and Taukei’aho’s All Blacks rest requirements, Thompson will likely play a decisive role in the team’s title run.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 6 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

17 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The All Blacks outplayed the Springboks in the World Cup final The All Blacks outplayed the Springboks
Search