Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

World Cup/Olympics double-up causing headaches in Australia

By AAP
The Women's Rugby World Cup kicks off on 8 October with a massive triple-header at Eden Park. (Photo by Dave Rowland/Getty Images)

Equipping players to feature in both the Tokyo Olympics and World Cup next year will be discussed as part of a Rugby Australia women’s high-performance review launched on Wednesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The postponed Games will now take place in July and August next year, with the World Cup in New Zealand from September 18.

In 2017, Sevens trio Mahalia Murphy, Shannon Parry and Sharni Williams all represented the Wallaroos in the World Cup.

Video Spacer

‘We’d like to leave a legacy’: Sunwolves respond to Rugby Australia’s proposed domestic competition.

Video Spacer

‘We’d like to leave a legacy’: Sunwolves respond to Rugby Australia’s proposed domestic competition.

Parry and Williams will be in the frame for both again next year, while the likes of Rio gold medal-winning teammates Ellia Green, Emma Tonegato, Alicia Lucas and Charlotte Caslick are all untested but exciting propositions in the traditional format.

Parry and Tonegato will be part of the panel that chart a path through 2021, while RA’s head of women’s rugby Jilly Collins is open to the idea of players doubling up in a “golden year” she says can “supercharge” women’s rugby in Australia.

Scheduling will be central to discussions, with both this year’s Wallaroos Tests and the remainder of the sevens world series up in the air after the coronavirus pandemic cut short this year’s Super W season.

This year’s university-based domestic rugby sevens tournament has been cancelled, while it is likely the national sevens programs for both men and women will be decentralised as part of the cash-strapped RA’s restructure.

ADVERTISEMENT

The university sevens program could be contested earlier next year with the Super W pushed back to better prepare players for their respective marquee events.

Rugby Australia have made clear the women’s programs won’t be forgotten as they navigate administrative change and attempt to secure a broadcast partner beyond this year.

“We need to consider how best to work within the constraints we have whilst delivering standards that are commensurate with high performance sport,” Collins said.

“This includes working with stakeholders to offset costs and bring in new revenue.”

– Murray Wenzel

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING OTD – Declan Kidney takes step up into Test rugby OTD – Declan Kidney takes step up into Test rugby
Search