Will Gatland's homecoming with the Chiefs be remembered fondly, if at all?
Warren Gatland won’t go down as the worst Super Rugby coach in New Zealand history but statistically speaking, he’s not far off.
That honour falls to the man who helmed the Crusaders in the inaugural season of the competition way back in 1996. In a year where they finished bottom of the table, Stewart’s men banked just two wins from 11 matches and he was promptly replaced the following season with coaching mastermind Wayne Smith. In 1997, Smith bumped the Crusaders up to sixth on the table and then grabbed back-to-back titles in his final two years in charge.
Further south, Glenn Ross managed a 27 per cent win-rate with the Highlanders in his only season in charge, in the same year that Smith took over at the Crusaders but it was Glenn Moore’s 26 per cent record between 2004 and 2007 that took the Highlanders to their lowest point.
The only other coaches who have presided over sub-30 per cent records spent their years with the Chiefs, with Kevin Greene finishing with a 27 per cent success rate from 2002 to 2003.
Enter Gatland in 2020.
Coming off a semi-final finish with Wales at the prior year’s Rugby World Cup and over a decade of successful international experience, there were hopes in the Waikato that Gatland could pick up where Dave Rennie had left off when he departed at the end of 2017 and rebuild following a few less than successful campaigns with Colin Cooper in charge.
New Zealand Rugby Head of Professional Rugby Chris Lendrum welcomed Gatland’s appointment.
“This is an outstanding appointment and a coup for the Chiefs, for Super Rugby and for the game in New Zealand generally,” said NZR head of professional rugby, Chris Lendrum. “We are excited to have a coach of Gats’ experience and international standing coming back into our environment.”
Chiefs CEO Michael Collins was also optimistic. “Warren is a world-class coach who boasts a proven track record,” he said. “With a sound rugby background and his desire to return home to New Zealand and be involved in Super Rugby naturally made him a top choice for the role.”
To Gatland’s credit, the Chiefs started the season as arguably the most impressive of the NZ franchises, banking four wins from six matches and scoring well-deserved wins over local rivals the Blues and Chiefs.
Then Covid struck.
Following a three-month break, things got back underway in the form of Super Rugby Aotearoa, and things quickly went downhill for the Chiefs. Eights fixtures ended in eight defeats for the Hamilton-based side and although Gatland’s men came within an inch of breaking the losing streak on a number of occasions (finishing within seven points of their opposition on no less than five occasions), they couldn’t stop the rot.
Of course, Gatland wouldn’t be on hand to turn things around the following season thanks to his unique contract situation with the Chiefs and New Zealand Rugby.
When Gatland first signed to return to NZ, the agreement was that he could take a sabbatical of sorts in 2021 in order to take charge of the British and Irish Lions in South Africa.
With Gatland off-shore, Clayton McMillan stepped in as interim coach and while he didn’t get off to the best start, with the Chiefs dropping their opening two matches of the season, they grabbed a shock come-from-behind victory over the Hurricanes in Round 4 – and then went on to bag a further four wins on the trot to secure a place in that year’s Super Rugby Aotearoa final.
The Chiefs finished the campaign with nine wins from 14 matches and when Gatland returned to the Waikato the following season, the franchise had a bit of a problem on their hands. Could you really reinstate Gatland in his post as a head coach when McMillan had proved so successful in his inaugural campaign?
In the end, the Chiefs settled for giving Gatland a newly conceived director of rugby role – with the specifics of the job never especially clear to anyone outside the organisation (and you suspect that many within Chiefs HQ might also have been at somewhat of a loss to explain the set-up). That’s no to say there weren’t merits to having Gatland on board, however, thanks to his ample experience at all levels of the game and his ties to the region, and the Chiefs players have widely praised Gatland’s contributions.
The point stands, however, that Gatland finished his tenure as head coach with a meagre 29 per cent win-record, and has now signed off from the club permanently, linking back up with Wales as a replacement for fellow Kiwi Wayne Pivac, who’s endured a challenging year at the helm.
How, then, will Gatland’s tenure with the Super Rugby franchise be remembered?
The nature of the initial contract, with Gatland spending a season away with the Lions, meant it was always going to be an interesting few years for Chiefs supporters. The fact remains that the former All Blacks hooker only really spent one season in the limelight and while his work behind the scenes may have reaped rewards – just take a look at how Samisoni Taukei’aho has flourished in the past few years – his time with the Chiefs will be judged on the results in 2020.
With the likes of Damian McKenzie, Sam Cane and Anton Lienert-Brown on the books, more was certainly expected from the side during their ill-fated Super Rugby Aotearoa campaign.
Kicking off the Chiefs’ worst-ever losing record (and also the worst for a New Zealand side) wasn’t a good look, although it should be noted that no teams of the past have ever had to play so many derby matches in a row and without a few easy-beats scattered amongst the fixtures, a poor run for one of the Kiwi franchises was always a distinct possibility.
With Gatland’s work fading into the background, most fans around NZ probably won’t even notice his absence – and his early exit from what was supposed to be a four-year deal won’t upset anyone.
But, ultimately, Gatland’s return to Hamilton and the Chiefs was supposed to be a spectacular homecoming and at the time was heralded as such. It never paved out that way, however, and with the odds on the Chiefs appointing a new director of rugby to replace Gatland slim at best, you do have to wonder what was the point of the whole affair.
Comments on RugbyPass
Huge engine this guy and great to see him back ..The amount of clean outs he does at the ruck are ridiculous !!
3 Go to commentsThe level of desperation in this article is just embarrassing.
215 Go to commentsSome silly trolling in the comments.
8 Go to commentsEverywhere you turn some irish journo is advocating Ireland as the greatest, reasoning that the wc is a 4 year cycle event so, they say wc doesn’t matter it’s the rugby in between that should account for the accolade. If there was no wc then some substance could be gained, however in my opinion the moment that defined Ireland’s fate against the abs was 37 phases of repeated head bashing against a brick wall. If a change in strategy or a tinker with the game plan was executed then things could've been vastly different. And to point a finger the let down was in the hands of the number 10.
36 Go to commentsI have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.
11 Go to commentsYeah, and ours is waaay bigger than yours. Just as you's get a semi…oh hold on that never happens
36 Go to commentsLove watching
1 Go to commentsThe Melbourne Rebels lineout is a complete disaster so not surprisingly a kiwi coach of the Wallabies hires the worst lineout coach in the country and a foreigner to boot. No surprises whatsoever here…….
3 Go to commentsThank your for wasting 2 minutes of my life Daniel. There is a useful message in there somewhere but your delivery sucks.
7 Go to commentsBen Smith, you are cry baby
215 Go to commentsSux that homophobia is still a thing though. I wonder how many players who could have become legends never kept playing rugby because they felt unwelcome.
7 Go to commentsCrazy he’s only 28, feel like he’s been around forever - don’t mind the move, safe pair of hands and creates depth in a thin position for ABs. Hopefully aides Kemara’s growth also without thrusting too much responsibility on him
1 Go to commentsMen should show strength and be mean, but they should be able to show emotion to those close yo them in certain times, birth of your child, death of family, proud moment. This article is stupid
7 Go to commentsWhat a weak article…absolute drivel and clickbait, well done. Will stick to rugby365 thanks
7 Go to commentsHonest, discipline, humility… Priceless.
2 Go to commentsSo many excuses. No mention of the SA number 2 being taken out illegally in the 2nd minute. That act of foul play had a massive impact on the SA game. Face it, NZ play pretty dirty very regularly, and it’s only since 2016 they’ve been held to higher officiating standards via stricter officiating and TMO reviews. They deserved to have a man down. Sorry. Fix the yellow and red cards and NZ will win more RWCs. Plus, there WAS a knock on invalidating the one try, so it was NOT a try. Period. Here’s a Kleenex…
215 Go to commentsOverheard conversation between NZ and SA rugby fans everywhere: We’re the greatest! No! we’re the greatest! We’re the greatest! No we’re the greatest! Ireland are arrogant! True but they beat you! We’re the greatest! No! we’re the greatest! Etc. etc, etc.
36 Go to commentsTypical crap Aussie weather
11 Go to comments“If they’d have beaten England, I still feel we would have been talking ‘is this the best team ever,’ ‘is this the best team that’s ever played in the Six Nations'” he said. “I still think they’re not quite that good. I actually don’t think they’re that good.” So Trimble is saying he doesn’t think this is the best 6N team of all time. He is silent on if it is the best Irish team of all time. Can’t disagree with him. Just another misrepresentative clickbait headline from the guys at RP.
36 Go to commentsWow, do we really still have to listen to all the excuses and “unfairness” of it all. Even blaming the bounce of an egg shaped ball for the loss. But the article is about context, so what about the Springboks having to play the other 5 teams in the top 6 and still beating a comparatively rested AB team on a very empty tank.
215 Go to comments