Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The Ireland tactic that Foster couldn't resist taking a swipe at

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by David Fitzgerald/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

It’s a weekly occurrence now in rugby, the commentary on the refereeing and its shortcomings, and Saturday’s aftermath in Dublin was no different when it came to the protagonists dissecting the fallout from Ireland defeating the All Blacks 29-20. All Blacks boss Ian Foster swept into the media conference room at Aviva Stadium and was quickly full of kudos for the victors.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Congratulations to Ireland,” he said unprompted at the start of the briefing, making an address off his own bat before the laptop was opened to overseas-based queries and then questions followed from those in attendance in the room situated in the bowels of the D4 stadium.   

“They thoroughly deserved their win. It was a game that they came out and played incredibly well, held the ball for long periods… I was really impressed with them. They played a high tempo game, kept us chasing and when it really mattered at the end we just didn’t quite have the composure to take the opportunity that presented to us and they just played a pressure game in that last little part.”

Video Spacer

Why Morne Steyn will be remembered as one of the greatest Springboks

Video Spacer

Why Morne Steyn will be remembered as one of the greatest Springboks

All very complimentary and all well received. Yet there was eventually one particular issue, other than his disagreement over the ruling out of the second half Akira Ioane try for a TMO adjudicated forward pass from Richie Mo’unga, that really got his goat – alleged delaying tactics from Ireland that slowed down the game’s tempo coming down the finishing straight. 

Between all the various jigs and reels over the course of an 80-minute match that took two hours to complete, James Lowe whacking the ball into the stands at 5.15 pm to finally call a halt to a contest with a 3.15pm kick-off, Foster was teed off that there were too many disruptions at a time in the game when the All Blacks just simply wanted to get on with the action quickly.      

“The game is supposed to be played fast,” he insisted near the end of the 16-minute briefing he attended in the company of skipper Sam Whitelock. “There are times if someone is injured and needs treatment they get a certain window of time and if they can’t fix it in that time they go to the sideline, so it’s hard for refs to try and speed the game up. 

“This is not a biggie for me but it was clearly a tactic and good on them [Ireland] for doing it because there was a lot of them going down with cramp and all sorts of stuff. I don’t begrudge that but we have just got to make sure we keep the game ticking over.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Anyone in the stands in Dublin who had access to the reflink would have had their ears perked by the constant chatter that unfolded across the two hours, referee Luke Pearce regularly reminding the combatants that he had a team of officials who should be allowed to do their job without interference.   

At one stage in the first half, when Dane Coles was on as a temporary sub with Cody Taylor in the sin bin, the All Blacks No16 was even heard remarking to the referee about Johnny Sexton, “He is a bit of a mouthy.” Sexton was in the sense that Pearce admonished him on a couple of occasions for making referrals that the officials weren’t interested in entertaining. 

What was Sexton’s view of the accusation? “He [Coles] has plenty to say all the time. I don’t mind that. When you are on the pitch it is heated, it’s a battle and I was trying to speak to the ref and they were taking offence that I was speaking to the ref. 

I wasn’t saying anything out of line I don’t think but we will have a look. Something I am always trying to work on is my communication with the referees. We will see how I went. Maybe I let it boil over at times towards the end of the first half when I felt that we had the ball and we weren’t getting some of the rewards for it, but we will go and have a look.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 7 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

19 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.' 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.'
Search