Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'That's not going to happen, not even in my wildest dreams'

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

England boss Eddie Jones has claimed it took his squad until their fallow week training camp in London to get back to the levels of conditioning and cohesiveness they had when they signed off on a successful Autumn Nations series with the win over South Africa. That November victory over the Springboks left his team with three wins from three matches for that campaign. 

ADVERTISEMENT

However, despite being together for a pre-tournament week in Brighton and then having match weeks against Scotland and Italy, it was only during the fallow week training camp between their round two and three February matches that England replicated the heights they had scaled three months ago. 

They have since beaten Wales and had another fallow week training camp, this time in Bristol, and speaking ahead of this weekend’s round four title eliminator versus Ireland at Twickenham, Jones suggested: “Are we moving to a better condition than we have been in? Certainly, all the parameters we look at we are (moving to a better condition). 

Video Spacer

Back in the Game – RFU

Video Spacer

Back in the Game – RFU

“It took us four weeks to get back to where we were against South Africa, which was the first fallow week. We then started with the same intensity and same accuracy as we did against South Africa and it took us four weeks to get back to it. Now we have surpassed what we did in the South African week and the team doesn’t know how good they can be and we are certainly going to find out on Saturday how good we can be.”

How good? “I have got a picture in my head and it’s a very good picture but we have got to keep developing and no progression is a linear progression. There is ups and downs and you have got to ride that.”

Related

With Jones alleging that it took England four weeks to get back up to the speed of where they had finished up in November, he was asked might it ever be possible for him to perhaps get access to his players for a longer period of time pre-tournament? After all, England have now been beaten in round one of the Six Nations for three consecutive years. 

“No, that is not going to happen,” he admitted, knowing the strict deals that exist between the RFU and Premiership Rugby regarding player release. “Not even I would think of that in my wildest dreams.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Is South America rugby's new promised land? Is South America rugby's new promised land?
Search