Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Russell controversy the spark for proposed radical SRU shake-up

Finn Russell will not return against England this weekend (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

The Scottish Rugby Union is set to shake-up its internal structures as part of recommendations made by an independent review of the Murrayfield set-up.

ADVERTISEMENT

Entrepreneur Bill Gammell and Scottish Ballet chairman Norman Murray were tasked with assessing the SRU’s corporate governance in the wake of the Keith Russell affair last year, when the governing body was found to have unfairly dismissed its director of domestic rugby, who is also father of Scotland star Finn Russell.

Their review has now proposed the abolishment of the SRU Council and the SRU Trust – which has held the SRU’s key assets, including Murrayfield itself since 1911 – and the creation of a ‘New Scottish Rugby Board’ that is directly accountable to clubs.

The plans – which have the backing of SRU chiefs – also call for roles of president and vice president to be combined, with president acting as an ambassador and to be elected by clubs on an annual basis.

Two new boards are also to be set up. A new rugby development board is recommended to oversee the grassroots game in Scotland while a professional performance board (PPB) would be responsible for the sporting elements of the Glasgow and Edinburgh pro teams and the new Super6 competition.

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

The PPB would be made up of nine members, including Scotland coach Gregor Townsend. The plans are set to be examined by clubs at a meeting next month but Gammell and Murray have urged members to back their proposals.

In a statement, they said: “It is increasingly clear that the structure and constitution of the Scottish Rugby Union needs further reform and improvement to reflect the dramatic changes in the game at this time. We believe that while the proposals are radical, they are pioneering, progressive and positive for the whole of the Scottish Rugby community.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Scottish Rugby must have a future-proofed organisation that has the skills and structure to develop both the domestic and professional game and ensure that the two sides of the sport are working together. We believe our proposal, if adopted, would give Scottish Rugby a world-class governance structure.”

– Press Association 

WATCH: Finn Russell gives Jim Hamilton a kicking masterclass at Racing 92’s traning ground in Paris

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Caelan Doris strikes out as clear Lions captaincy frontrunner Caelan Doris strikes out as clear Lions captaincy frontrunner
Search