Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

RWC opening ceremony stuns fans around the world

By Josh Raisey
Former New Zealand captain Richie McCaw lifts the Webb Ellis Cup during the opening ceremony in Tokyo (Photo by Adam Pretty/Getty Images)

Japan have stunned fans all over the world with a spectacular opening ceremony to the ninth Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is the first time the tournament has been held in Asia and fans at the stadium in Tokyo and around the world were treated to a visual display on the pitch which showcased Japan’s history, culture, art and geography, including a model of Mount Fuji that emerged from the middle of the field. 

The display was mesmerising throughout and many fans have commented on Twitter how beautiful the light display was. 

The ceremony was only improved when All Blacks legend Richie McCaw – the last man to lift the Webb Ellis Cup in 2015 – appeared to present the trophy to everyone ahead of the start of the 2019 finals. 

The 148-cap flanker was warmly welcomed at Tokyo Stadium as he bid farewell to the coveted prize that he won twice in his career. 

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

The atmosphere at the stadium was electric, particularly as each competing nation was announced. New Zealand, Ireland and Wales receiving a very warm welcome, as well as the hosts. This was the reaction to the ceremony: 

https://twitter.com/PushinNovaYou/status/1174988938043281408?s=20

https://twitter.com/jasfuckingsingh/status/1174990064134348800?s=20

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/galumay/status/1175009760522854403?s=20

Japan, who went on to defeat Russia 30-10, were expected to put on quite a show in the opening ceremony – and they certainly did not disappoint. 

With Tokyo hosting the summer Olympics next year, this may be a glimpse of what the world can expect to see in 2020. 

WATCH: The RugbyPass Lego World Cup 

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game
Search