Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Rugby player in staying out late shocker' - Twitter sees lighter side of the Te'o/Vunipola hotel incident

By Josh Raisey
Owen Farrell and Ben Te'o

In light of the story surrounding Ben Te’o and Billy Vunipola’s late night after England’s draw to Scotland on Saturday, fans on Twitter cannot believe that this is newsworthy.

ADVERTISEMENT

The duo came in in the late hours of Sunday morning and caused a disturbance in their west London hotel. While there is no curfew in Eddie Jones’ team, players are expected to return together.

However, at the end of a long Six Nations Championship, many fans have taken the players’ side, highlighting the pressure that is put on professional sportspeople and the fact that they are still humans. Some fans are even questioning the environment that Eddie Jones and England are creating whereby this would be deemed a serious offence.

This is what the fans are saying:

https://twitter.com/bigphilgj/status/1108673073740500994
https://twitter.com/fwb1974/status/1108673168779235328
https://twitter.com/adamreuben/status/1108635617951404032
https://twitter.com/mark_scott3103/status/1108475583636430851
https://twitter.com/cwalters1927/status/1108465080612675587
https://twitter.com/madaboutewe/status/1108468096950505473
https://twitter.com/NykomaHamilton/status/1108493632754077701
https://twitter.com/ColinDavies8/status/1108490166015008770
https://twitter.com/rich3393/status/1108488766417788928
https://twitter.com/shaunie_72/status/1108507138979188736

The consensus is clearly that the players are allowed to go out at the end of a tournament, as time in the England training camp would have taken its toll.

Of course, in the past, Manu Tuilagi and Denny Solomona were sent home from an England training camp for a similar transgression, but perhaps the fans feel differently about this one due to the fact that the Six Nations is now over. Indeed, some fans have made light of the story, suggesting England started drinking at half time of their match at Twickenham, after squandering a 31-7 lead against Scotland.

Furthermore, as much as Welsh fans would want to deride their rival nation, and vice versa, this seems to be a story in which the fans have universally sided with the players.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both Te’o and Vunipola have apologised to their teammates, and the issue has been dealt with by England, and it looks as though that is the end of it, even though the fans feel there was nothing to begin with.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 12 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

29 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed
Search