Northern | US

Premiership's £500m debt: How much each club actually owes


A Gallagher Premiership flag (Photo by Alex Livesey/Getty Images)
Comments
5 Comments

How much debt is owed by each Gallagher Premiership club has been revealed as part of their participation in a UK government committee next month.

ADVERTISEMENT

English rugby bosses are being asked to explain themselves in a parliamentary committee next month to address the game’s financial crisis.

Officials from the Rugby Football Union (RFU) and Premiership Rugby will appear before the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) committee in November to answer questions on the problems facing those clubs and the wider sustainability of the game.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

As a result of that committee, the figures owed by each club has been published on the House of Commons website, with the total amount including the now defunct Worcester Warriors totalling over half a billion pounds.

This mountain of debt includes that of Wasps, who owe a staggering £112.3 million, by far the largest single debt in the league, amounting to 24 per cent of the total.

Wasps joined Worcester in administration on Monday, making 167 members of staff including players and coaches redundant. Both clubs had already been suspended from the Gallagher Premiership, which now contains just 11 teams.

The loss of both Wasps and Worcester from the league for this season has meant that sides also have sizeable holes in their fixture calendar. Empty stadiums will mean a further loss of revenue for clubs,  many of whom are now seeking to make ad hoc fixtures to make up the difference.

ADVERTISEMENT

Following Wasps, the second most indebted club is Bristol Bears, who owe £51.2 million, which is 11 per cent of all the debt in the league.

Third on the list is Saracens, who owe £40.8 million, 9 per cent of the total debt of the league.

Bath have debts totalling £37.8 million, which equates to 8 per cent of the league’s total. London Irish aren’t far behind with £37.3 million.

Related

Fellow Londoners Harlequins also have a significant amount of debt, with £33.7 million. Newcastle Falcons, who are typically viewed as one of the smaller operations in the league, owe £32 million. Both the Tynesiders and Quins individual debut equates to roughly 7 per cent of the league.

ADVERTISEMENT

Big spending Sale Sharks have £30.9 of debt, which is again approximately 7 per cent of the competition’s total debt.

Midland heavyweights Leicester Tigers owe £30.1 million.

Gloucester owe £27.1 million, while Northampton Saints follow closely on £26.5 million.

By far the least amount of debt is owed by Exeter Chiefs, at £13 million, which is equal to just 3 per cent of club debt.

Related

Worcester Warriors debt is not included in the list, with the other e12 clubs’ total equalling £473.7 million. When you add Worcester’s debt, which is at least £30 million when you tally what they owe HMRC and other creditors, then the combined total is over half a billion.

The PRL are likely to be taken to task on the lack of regulation of individual club finances. As the body is basically a confederation of clubs, it’s a case of self-policing, as the RFU have little say unless a club enters insolvency.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 1 hour ago
Jake White renews calls for Springboks to be forced to play from home

Absolutely agree H. Some of our best coaches are overseas getting paid decent wages. Johan van Graan and Franco Smith the two most high profile but there are others Shaun Sowerby and Hein Adams both at Bordeaux. It can only be money. I don’t think the current top four coaches are up to the same standard as some of the South Africans coaching overseas. My experience in coaching is that there are three year natural cycles, Year one - re-alignment. Bringing in the new ideas anc coaching prioroties. Very often the first season is punctuated by losses trying to adapt form the old to the new ways. Year two the team gels around the new ways and beginning to achieve near their potential. Year three the peak of the new methods. But this is the year when inevitable the form of good players begins to attract offers from greener pastures and key players leave with the inevitable decline in results. It happened to me when I coached Kloof Senior Primary when we beat some very established teams like Cordwalles Highbury and WP Prep, Hugh Reece Edwards was rugby director at Westville and four of my key players left for bursaries there with the inevitable fall in results. It happened again when I was manager of the Hillcrest Villagers - after gaining entry to the premier competition when we beat teams like Harlequins complete with Vleis Visagie and Robert du Preez - low and behold that HR Edwards then became coach of Crusaders and would you believe it - four of our key players went there at the end of the season together with three or four others who retired, and of course we were relegated.

So - the fact that Rassie has managed to hang on players and develop others to fill the inevitable gaps and the fact that he has a wide spread of ideas besides his own I think is key to the continued - and long may it continue - success of the Boks. Our retreads are useful to fill gaps until others develop and also to act as player/mentor/coach such as Os du Rand and Frans Steyn so the mix is good but you can’t rely solely on those players like The Sharks do. I think mostly the others are getting there. Hope so.



...

13 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close