Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Lynagh niggle adds intrigue to Reds' No.10 question

By AAP
Tom Lynagh of the Junior Wallabies looks on during the U20 match between the Junior Wallabies and the Australian Barbarians at David Phillips Field on June 14, 2023 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Tom Lynagh’s English accent is fading and in its place is a new-found mongrel he knows he’ll need as the race to wear the Queensland Reds’ No.10 intensifies.

ADVERTISEMENT

The son of Wallabies great Michael is in his third pre-season at Ballymore, the Italian-born, England-raised playmaker taking brave steps to move back to Australia to join the Reds in 2011.

Still just 20, Lynagh took big strides under former coach Brad Thorn, earning plaudits for his kicking under pressure in a win and close loss to the Chiefs to finish the Super Rugby Pacific season.

But Thorn’s been replaced by Les Kiss this year, who says any of Lynagh, veteran James O’Connor, Lawson Creighton or Junior Wallabies graduate Harry McLaughlin-Phillips could wear the No.10.

Adding another twist to that is Lynagh’s revelation to AAP that he’s carrying a minor back niggle that could keep him sidelined for pre-season trials against the Western Force and NSW Waratahs over the next fortnight.

Tom Lynagh
Tom Lynagh des Reds est plaqué lors du match de la première journée du Super Rugby Pacific entre les Queensland Reds et les Hurricanes au Queensland Country Bank Stadium, le 25 février 2023, à Townsville, en Australie. (Photo par Ian Hitchcock/Getty Images)

Lynagh has poise, accuracy and composure like his World Cup-winning father but knows that might not be enough on its own to take ownership of a jersey.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There’s plenty of choice at 10, it’s all up for grabs and nobody’s really sure what will happen,” he told AAP, the twang developed during his time at Surrey’s rugby institution Epsom College all-but gone.

“Put your best foot forward and compete, which is something I’ve come to learn, to be a bit more competitive.”

Lynagh has bulked up since the Reds’ gutting quarter-final loss to the Chiefs and is excited by what Kiss will bring back from years coaching in Europe.

“I used to watch a lot of London Irish and liked how they played,” Lynagh said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The coaches believed in me last year, not for one second did I doubt I might struggle.

“But since that game I’d like to think I’m more robust, got a bit of armour on me.

“And the other parts (other than kicking); the running, taking it to the line, has all been fast-forwarded and developed by Les.

“We’re all pretty excited to show people what we can do.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 4 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.' 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.'
Search