Northern | US

Jones faces No.8 selection dilemma


Billy Vunipola
Comments
Comment

Only months after Eddie Jones opted to take one specialist No.8 to the Rugby World Cup, it has quickly become one of the most competitive positions in the England squad.

ADVERTISEMENT

Harlequins’ Alex Dombrandt was a rising star last season, but failed to make the RWC squad, while an ACL injury to Sam Simmonds and a slump in form for Nathan Hughes saw them miss out as well.

Billy Vunipola was taken to Japan and was used frequently, as Jones clearly felt there was no point even creating the pretense that the Saracens No8 was not his first choice.

However, all of Vunipola’s competitors, which also includes his Saracens teammate Ben Earl, have started the season in blistering fashion with call ups to the Six Nations squad looking inevitable.

Video Spacer

The 22-year-old Dombrandt has been tipped by many to feature for England, and he has only improved his chances recently. In what has not always been a Harlequins team on top, particularly in the recent loss to Ulster, Dombrandt has still managed to make an impact ball in hand, and will inevitably improve in a strong England pack.

Exeter Chiefs No.8 Simmonds’ man of the match display against Sale Sharks in the Champions Cup at the weekend was perhaps the biggest statement to Jones so far this season, and proof that he has returned to top form following his injury. Not only did he go over for two tries, but he showed the athleticism and pace of a back when in space, and the power of a forward in the tight, which is what makes him such a unique player.

Vunipola’s performance against Munster at Allianz Park was just as impressive, particularly his assist for Sean Maitland’s try. The 27-year-old was able to attract four defenders before offloading to the Scotland international. This is not only an insight into the power he possesses, but the formidable reputation that he has. Such is his presence on the field, Keith Earls was understandably drawn in to try and help two of his teammates stop him, which created the space for the try.

ADVERTISEMENT

While he may be used sparingly this season, Vunipola showed that post-RWC fatigue is not an issue, with a workload few can match in his position. In his absence, the 21-year-old Earl has stepped up this season as well, and will undeniably be on Jones’ radar.

Meanwhile, Hughes has been reinvigorated since his move to Bristol Bears in the summer, and he would have caught the eye of the England selectors’ with a number of man of the match performances in the Gallagher Premiership.

https://twitter.com/jonnymango95/status/1202929606724116485?s=20

The best thing for England is that these players all offer something different. Simmonds and Earl may not have the size advantage over their competitors, but they have the pace and dynamism to trouble any defence, and also the versatility to play across the back row.

ADVERTISEMENT

Changes are expected to the England squad for next year’s Six Nations, and Jones will be in a quandary choosing who will make it.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NoLongerARuck 57 minutes ago
'The All Blacks are asking South Africa all the questions that matter'

Nick I would be curious to know what the Ball in play time for this match was? It seems like NZ got a much more favourable set of stats in this game compared to the beggars ration they got before. They built 100 plus rucks, they broke the line multiple times and their scrum was more solid. They also won the territory and possession battle but they still lost. The Boks made massive improvements though winning 6 turnovers and reducing the turnovers won by NZ from 14 to an unbeleivable 2. Was that down to Angus Gardener? Cant imagine Amashukeli will deny the contest as much as Gardener did but the Springboks did really well to stay connected to support when they did carry and didnt look to pass a whole lot preferring to attack the seams. Springbok defence was also imacculate with just 5 pens given away. They also won so many contestables with them kicking super accurately. NZ sprayed over 200 passes and for 4 tries only. It wasnt the best return and the rush worked well when you consider the disparity in post contact metres. Their scrum became more reliable but their lineout was a messy affair. Its fair too say if NZ can gain parity at set piece and sort out the contestable they give themselves a great chance at winning. The Springboks though need to find a bench balance that will see them return to green in the final quarter where they have been resoundingly thumped in the first 2 matches. One feels for them to win they need to build a lead, win loads of pens and cash in on 22m entries. I reckon NZ have more ways to win the match, the Springboks though are the best at forcing outcomes so even that may not be enough.

36 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close