Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Inaccurate speculation': Upset Six Nations issue statement about 4 Nations rumour

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Six Nations officials have finally stuck their head above the parapet amid the Covid-19 crisis, reprimanding sections of the media for what they describe as inaccurate speculation relating to the potential staging of a ‘Four Nations’ competition in November that would exclude France and Italy.

ADVERTISEMENT

With rugby around the globe currently at a standstill and the July Test programme now postponed following the outbreak of the virus that prevented the conclusion of the 2020 Guinness Six Nations in March, the sport has been awash with rumours as to how rugby could play out at international level next October and November. 

There is even speculation that the Six Nations are now seemingly amenable to talks about in future delaying the traditional February start of their annual tournament to facilitate the formulation of a global calendar in conjunction with the southern hemisphere’s Rugby Championship. 

Video Spacer

Fijian legend Nemani Nadolo talks about his impending switch from Montpellier to Leicester

Video Spacer

Fijian legend Nemani Nadolo talks about his impending switch from Montpellier to Leicester

One of the rumours regarding 2020 has been the idea of staging a mini Six Nations along the lines of the old Four Nations that was played before France and latterly Italy were allowed to participate. 

This notion came about amid fears that travel restrictions could still be in place next November, preventing the usual tours to Europe of the likes of the All Blacks.   

However, this idea of the home nations excluding their European colleagues has forced the Six Nations to react, dismissing the idea that a Four Nations is on the agenda for later this year. 

In a statement, Six Nations said: “Six Nations, together with its constituent unions and federations, is fully committed to completing the 2020 Guinness Six Nations Championship and hopes to stage postponed matches later this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In exploring rescheduling options, the health and safety of players, associated staff and of course supporters is our number one priority and any rescheduled matches will be subject to government guidance and to travel restrictions between countries. 

“Six Nations remains in close contact with all relevant authorities to ensure these matches can take place in a safe environment. 

“Six Nations and its constituent unions and federations continue to work closely with World Rugby, the southern hemisphere unions and all other rugby stakeholders on contingency plans regarding autumn Internationals and the recently impacted summer tours. 

“The current situation is fluid and fast-changing with countries at different stages in battling this pandemic. We anticipate it will take a few more weeks before the situation becomes clearer and we can present more definitive options in which to resume activity.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Four matches from the 2020 tournament are still to be played, the round four meeting of Ireland versus Italy in Dublin along with the entire round five schedule of Wales vs Scotland in Cardiff, Italy vs England in Rome and France vs Ireland in Paris.

England currently top the table on points difference from France who had their Grand Slam hoped dashed by their round four loss at Scotland on March 8. 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Is South America rugby's new promised land? Is South America rugby's new promised land?
Search