'I'm pretty sure it is a tactic': Boks' stalling theatrics deliberate
Although the All Blacks were expecting a traditional approach from the Springboks, there were still aspects of their game that left the coaching staff surprised, including the box kicks being hoisted on the edge of the All Blacks’ 22 metre line.
With his side deep on attack, Springboks scrumhalf Faf de Klerk went to the air multiple times with possession right on the edge of the 22 as he looked for a fatal drop down around the five metres line.
All Blacks assistant coach John Plumtree admitted that they had not expected the Springboks’ kicking game to take such an approach when so deep on attack in their territory.
“We didn’t expect that, no,” Plumtree told media on Sunday afternoon.
“It’s definitely a different way to build pressure, isn’t it? The boys were saying there was a little bit of spiralling going on with some of those Faf de Klerk bombs as well. We know what to expect next week now because they’ll definitely bring that again.”
A key part of defusing the aerial game was the direction of the wind which made fielding high balls more difficult in the second half as the ball held up into the breeze.
Plumtree noted there was marked difference in their ability to control the catching in the second half versus the first.
“In the first half we looked after the high balls probably a bit easier because they had quite a strong wind. You might not have picked it up on TV, but the wind was quite strong,” he said.
“In the second half, when they were kicking into it, the balls were holding up longer and the kicks weren’t quite as long. The kicks were going around 11-12 metres, in the first half it was more like 20 metres.
“It’s the one’s that are a bit closer that we will have to work on this week.”
The game against the Springboks was noticeably slow, with a total of 26 penalties creating a stop-start affair that became a set-piece grind.
At every stoppage it seemed like Springbok players were on the ground getting attention, slowing down the game at every opportunity.
A key to controlling the tempo is for the All Blacks to control the ball, which they weren’t able to do in Townsville conceding an astounding 24 turnovers. Plumtree said his side can control the speed if they fix their handling.
“We can play the tempo game if we control the ball. If we don’t control the ball, the game will stop and start,” he said.
Plumtree did say he believed the Springboks stalling is a deliberate tactic to keep the All Blacks from playing their game that ‘no one’ wants to play against them.
“We can’t control the injury thing, if their medics or water boys are coming on. The game just slowed down, so I’m pretty sure it is a tactic,” he said.
“No one wants to play a high speed, up tempo game against us right now, but it is up to the officials to deal with that.”
The Springboks’ tactic worked to a degree to keep the game close, something that head coach Jacques Nienaber said he expected from the two sides who haven’t been separated by much in their last five contests despite South Africa only claiming one win.
“I think we always play gripping and physical [rugby],” Nienaber responded.
“I can’t speak of the past, but since 2018 when I’ve been involved, 2018 in Wellington it was two points to us, came back to Pretoria, two points for them, a 16-all draw in 2019 and then a 10-point victory in the World Cup.
“So, that’s the contest, it’s that type. So, no, I expected it from both sides.”
Nienaber believed his game plan “worked”, but conceded that it sometimes works against the Springboks playing for so many 50-50 aerial contests.
“I thought the game plan worked, I thought we had opportunities, they had opportunities. Listen, it probably came down to the wire, a call here a bounce of the ball there, sometimes it goes for you and sometimes it goes against you.
“[Against the] British and Irish Lions, we won with a penalty kick like this, Australia we lost, New Zealand we lost now with a kick like this. I think it swings in roundabouts.
The head coach was blunt when asked about whether they should have changed their approach in the final few minutes when needing another penalty to get back in the lead.
Reserve halfback Herschel Jantjies hoisted a box kick away with less than a minute remaining with the Springboks down two points, despite being in field position good enough to work for a penalty by keeping possession in hand.
“I don’t think so,” is all Nienaber could muster in response.
Comments on RugbyPass
Can’t see Toulouse beating Leinster at this rate.
7 Go to commentsADP was having a very average game until winning that penalty for Toulouse, sticking his big head in the way. “The head of God”?
7 Go to commentsHarlequins doing their best to do as little damage as possible with all the possession. Looks like they skipped catch and pass drills this week.
7 Go to commentsSeeing pictures of Jacques high-fiving it with Irish players breaks my heart. Too soon. I need more time.
1 Go to commentsquins is all over the place. The minute they get the ball they panic. Quins can still win tho just need to win all rucks otherwise just don't bother.
7 Go to commentsGreat wins for the male & female kiwi sides. Ireland not far away..
1 Go to commentsWhy is this dude getting so much coverage? Usually knobs like this get cancelled.
2 Go to commentsWow. What was that? A 3 million word meandering article about what exactly?
1 Go to commentsNice piece of writing. And yes the Sharks pulled a rabbit from the hat and were a little lucky with that penalty try that wasn’t given… however the Sharks (with their resources) should be way more consistent and should be putting teams like Claremont away for breakfast. I expect more from them and hope they kick on now.
8 Go to commentsJust what the Sharks needed to get things going in the right direction Defence on the outside really creates havoc for the whole team and needs to be addressed.
8 Go to commentsWell done guys both teams will be ready to play knockout rugby.
1 Go to commentsSurprised that Ramos isn't starting at 15. But what a squad of galacticos!
2 Go to commentsWhy is it a snub? What journalistic garbage is that? Sure the guy is a great player, but there are plenty of loose forwards and not all of them can be Springboks. Also, I know of no-one who doubts Rassie’s judgment. South Africa has a conveyor belt of loose forwards that just keeps producing, so the competition is intense. I certainly wish him well, but there is no entitlement and there is no snub.
17 Go to commentsSkelton may be brought back for the Wallabies so that would be the only reason that may hinder Wilson. Easily the form, most skilful and game IQ of any Oz 8. Valentini’s best and favourite position is 6, but lineouts may be an issue with Skelton, Valentini and Wilson. Will be interesting what Schmidt goes for but for me Wilson should be picked on form. Schmidt rewards work rate, skill and consistency. All that glitters every so often won’t be in contention. Greely is one of those players that has a knack of making the right decision. A coach is going to love him because he knows week in week out he’s going to get the job done. The second try Greely wasn’t the guy who made the initial break it was Flook, Greely was at the bottom of the ruck when Flook was off along the sideline. Greely got up and made the effort to catch up with play but also read the play nicely and hit the pass from Campbell at pace and then held the pass beautifully to Ryan.
6 Go to commentsSpot on Ben. Dead right. Havili looked great at 10. Easily the highest rugby IQ of any NZ player these days. Getting a kick charged down is a result of getting used to adjusting your depth to the line at 10, which he will sort out with time. But other than that it was an outstanding first effort in that position this year. I think the NZ media has misunderstood this directive from Razor. Havili might rank behind B Barrett this year, but Beuden is 33 this month and won't last much longer. DMaC is great but flaky and not really a test match animal (his efforts in Dunedin versus Aus last year for example). If Razor can't have Mounga, DMaC is too unstructured for Razor (and is just too small for test rugby). Havili will end up our first choice first five, and in partnership with Jodie will be excellent. Two triple threat operators in tandem, and big bodies and tough tacklers to boot. Jordoe will be the ABs goal kicker. I am an Aucklander and Blues (and Warriors) fan, but Havili at 10 is going to be sensational in time… he can be the best first five in the world by the end of this year. No question.
6 Go to commentsSharks deserved to be far further back by the last quarter. Their tackling was awful, their set pieces were disappointing, their defensive organization was poor (especially on the Kok side of the D line), they kept making unnecessary errors, and they never looked like cracking the Clermont defense during those first 60m. Masuku kept them in touch, with some help from the Clermont generosity on penalty opportunities. Agree with the writer of this article. It was belligerence, and ability to raise their pressure game just enough, that turned the last quarter into a Bok-style shutout. Clermont have a reputation of not playing the full 80m, and there was a bit of that for sure. But, quite often when the intensity of a team drops off in the last quarter credit is due to the opponent for tiring them out. At 60m, with the Kok try, you thought that just maybe the game was on. At 70m, with the Mapimpi contribution, one felt that Clermont were fading, while facing a team that would maintain the pressure game through the final whistle. Good win in the end, but the Sharks are still playing way below their potential. And with their resources, and a coach that has had enough time to figure things out, they are running out of excuses.
8 Go to commentsGood riddance
1 Go to commentswel the crusaders were beaten by a queensland reds side that hadnt beaten them at home since 1999 and queensland reds partied like it was 1999
6 Go to commentsHard to disagree with the 5 points - with the exception that Wilson should be a squad member but, depending on the other loose forward selections, is not yet a shoo-in. McReight is. Aussie is looking a lot better this year and JS has some selection options. Also, Havili’s tendency to get caught, charged down is also a liability at times but he seemed focused (mostly) and is definitely a consideration for utility back-up. Still feel Reihana is a better prospect at 1st five for Saders.
6 Go to commentsYeah nah, still not sure on Havili tbh. Even though I’m a Crusaders fan through and through I’d be stunned if Razor considers him after seeing some of the stunning talent coming through up North.
6 Go to comments