Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'I was watching him closely and thinking, 'When do we bring him off?''

Getty Images

Bath director of rugby Stuart Hooper believes having a “single focus” will prove a big boost for his team’s Gallagher Premiership aspirations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hooper’s men, whose Heineken Cup hopes are over for the season following a poor run of pool results, edged Sale 16-14 in a thriller at the Recreation Ground on Saturday to register their second victory in as many weekends and move into serious play-off contention.

They will look to make it three wins on the bounce at arch rivals Gloucester next week.

“I thought we found ways to pressure them, kick points and ultimately come away with the four points,” Hooper said. “It sharpens our focus going into Gloucester.

Video Spacer

“Europe was going to be a tough competition for us. It was a realisation of where we are. The Premiership is our single focus (now) and we believe that, on any single day, we can beat anyone in the Premiership but we have to play really well to do that.

“Having a single focus is big for us and we go to Gloucester with that single focus. It is not a turning point (beating Sale) but it is an opportunity for us to push hard in the Premiership.”

Saturday’s victory was secured thanks to three penalties from fly-half Rhys Priestland and the conversion of England centre Jonathan Joseph’s second-half try.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sharks had to wait until well into the second half before they got their points when hooker Akker Van der Merwe and wing Byron McGuigan crossed for tries converted by fly-half Robert Du Preez.

That made it 14-13 to Sale before the last Priestland penalty nine minutes from time restored Bath’s lead and, with it, the triumph.

Wales number eight Taulupe Faletau emerged unscathed from his first 80 minutes of the season, just in time to mount a challenge for a Six Nations Championship place under new national coach Wayne Pivac.

“He is pleased he has got through it,” Hooper said. “Credit to him for the work he has put in and to our medical team.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I was watching him closely and thinking, ‘When do we bring him off?’ But he was going really well and had some big moments at the end of the game which you would expect from a player of his quality.”

Sale’s director of rugby Steve Diamond was not as satisfied with the afternoon’s events, and was adamant that referee Craig Maxwell-Keys should have given his side a penalty six minutes from time when, he claimed, Bath’s Tom Dunn made an illegal tackle on England flanker Tom Curry.

Diamond said: “Tom Curry, who is a world-class player, has had a no-arms tackle but I need to have a look at that.

“Those decisions are really crucial. The wins and losses are decided on that one decision.

“With those decisions, you have to be rock sure and I wonder why he did not consult his TMO.”

As for the game, Diamond said: “Fair play to Bath, they had their 16th man out there (the crowd) but well done to them.

“I don’t know where we are going in the league because we have a dominant scrum and South Africa proved in the World Cup final that, if you have a dominant scrum, you win games.

“But ours isn’t getting anything. There is no point in coaching players and getting them to this standard if they are never going to get any ascendancy. That is really disappointing.”

Diamond insisted, however: “We are in a good place, definitely.”

– Press Association

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 6 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

17 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search