Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Eddie Jones explains the thinking behind removing Owen Farrell from the Calcutta Cup cauldron

Owen Farrell looks on as the secondhalf collapse unfolds

Eddie Jones has revealed he brought off Owen Farrell at a critical phase of Saturday’s remarkable 38-38 draw with Scotland at Twickenham due to England’s captain losing his “edge”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Farrell was replaced by George Ford in the 71st minute with the climatic match of the 2019 Guinness Six Nations tied at 31-31 after the Scots had produced five unanswered tries to threaten the greatest comeback victory in Test history.

The Saracens fly-half had gifted two of those tries – to Stuart McInally and Finn Russell – and was also lucky to escape a card for a late shoulder-led tackle on Darcy Graham.

Confessing his role in Scotland’s resurgence, Farrell admitted “we probably gifted them the momentum swing, me more than anyone” and it was Ford who crossed for the converted added-time try that spared England from humiliation.

“Owen lost a bit of his edge. He was just a little bit off his best and George Ford has been in exceptional form this week,” Jones told BBC Radio 5 Live’s Sportsweek programme.

Video Spacer

“We know George is an excellent player who can bring something different to the table. We ended up getting a draw due to George’s brilliant play.

“The only thing I was pleased about in the second half was the response of our finishers, who got us out of a deep hole. They got us a draw in difficult circumstances in the end.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Overall England produced the best rugby of the Six Nations and dominated the try-scoring charts by touching down 24 times, 10 more than their closest rivals Ireland and Scotland, yet it was Wales who were crowned worthy champions.

Collapses in the second half in Cardiff and against Scotland at Twickenham point to a mental fragility that must be remedied in time for the World Cup and Jones is ready to enlist outside help to find a solution.

“The All Blacks had this problem for eight years and it cost them two World Cups. It’s not an easy problem to fix. We’ve had four years, we’re getting there,” Jones said.

Owen Farrell goes off the field during the Six Nations match between England and Scotland at Twickenham (Photo by Henry Browne/Getty Images)
ADVERTISEMENT

“We know what the issue is and we know how to fix it. We’ve got a very concrete plan in mind to fix it.

“It’s just about getting the right personnel and staff in who can engage the players in conversation and allow them to be honest in how they think under pressure.

“If you look at the Six Nations in its entirety, tries for and against, we sit fairly well. We had a poor 30 against Wales and a poor 40 against Scotland.”

Wing Jack Nowell admitted seeing Scotland retain the Calcutta Cup felt more like a defeat than a draw and lock George Kruis used complacency to explain how a 31-0 lead was surrendered.

“It was disappointing. It was a proper tale of two halves. We got shocked and just didn’t deal with that properly,” Kruis said.

“In the first half it probably came a bit too easily and then off the back of that we probably weren’t humble enough to realise where we were at.

“We lost control in the second half against Wales. Apart the second half against Scotland and half an hour against Wales, we’ve got to look at the bigger picture and we’ve had a really good Six Nations, but this is a tough one to take.”

PA

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 5 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

16 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good an Irish side' Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good'
Search