Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Analysis: How the Springboks shut down the All Blacks' attack and delivered a historical defensive performance

By Ben Smith
The All Blacks were restricted to one of their lowest totals this decade against the Springboks in Wellington. (Photos/Gettys Images)

The All Blacks were restricted to just 16 points compared to 34 on the same ground in the corresponding fixture last year. This is a simple indication that this Springbok side is a much better defensive side.

ADVERTISEMENT

However more specifically, when faced with the same situations they handled them much better this year. They showed improved defensive awareness as a unit based on lessons learned and adapted much quicker to shut down the attack with relentless high-line pressure.

They were able to contain the All Blacks to just a solitary try conceded on a turnover ‘click’ play often shutting down everything else, and put in a historically good defensive performance.

Fool me once

The All Blacks seem to like to use specific ‘21’ patterns from the lineout against the Springboks, designed to create mismatches with speedsters like Beauden Barrett and Damian McKenzie on third phase switches.

Much of these plays are spearheaded around using a ‘skinny’ option play off the flyhalf on the first phase to set up the first ruck, before carrying around the corner to use two-thirds of the width of the field.

The ‘skinny’ play relies on short passing in tight space to target the 10-12 channel or sometimes the 12-13 using the backdoor wing option.

In last year’s test, Beauden Barrett plays Rieko Ioane out the back who crashes into winger Jesse Kriel (playing centre at this stage), while Ryan Crotty (12) offers a late support line.

ADVERTISEMENT

Again on Saturday, the All Blacks started their lineout starter plays with the same move.

With Sonny Bill Williams (12) and Rieko Ioane (11) presenting big, strong ball carriers, the All Blacks have a high chance of reaching the gain line and punching through with momentum using this play.

ADVERTISEMENT

If the call is a ‘21’ pattern, a pod of three will come around the corner on the second phase to set up the ‘axis’ ruck from which the switch will occur on the third phase.

A tell that shows the All Blacks are setting up for a strike on the later phases is the 10 on the ‘skinny’ play often plays the pass a touch early. He can’t risk ball-playing too late and getting tackled as he tends to have a key role to play later on. If he is put on the ground it can throw everything out.

In ’21’ plays, often he needs to be used as bait to lure the defence over or he is used as the key switch runner tacking across the field. If he is out of position because he’s pinned to the ground it throws a spanner in the works.

Last year, the Springboks were guilty of overcommitting after the second phase carry.

Just as Damian McKenzie (23) and Beauden Barrett (10) appear to move towards the left side, a host of Boks fold around the corner to defend the other side.

The All Blacks catch them short on a double-screen pass play and only last-ditch cover defence stops McKenzie scoring in the corner.

Early in the first half the All Blacks set-up a multi-phase raid attacking the same edge with a similar ’21’ switch play installed on the third phase.

This time Richie Mo’unga (10) hits Williams (12) with a short pass on the first phase ‘skinny’ play.

Even before the carry around the corner comes on the second phase, centre Lukhanyo Am (13) has diagnosed the pattern unfolding and calls for defenders to stay on the far side.

Kieran Read (8) takes the carry followed by a host of support players while Am is still scanning with eyes up. We can see Beauden Barrett (15) slowly beginning his path back across for the switch.

Often the difficulty with identifying these plays is the ‘picture’ the defence sees doesn’t come into focus until the last second.

The players involved in the first ‘skinny’ play are all on the ground, with only Codie Taylor stationed out wide. For Eben Etzebeth (4) and Faf de Klerk (9), they see empty space in front of them.

It is easy for the defence to ignore this side of the field and fold. However, in less than a second, the players on the ground will re-load, Barrett will time his run, and all the pieces will fall into place.

As the re-loading starts to take place, Am (13) is now 100% sure what is happening and signals for his forwards to stay put.

Am jumps up and down whilst screaming instructions over, which are adhered to. The Springboks re-load the defence on the far side with solid numbers to counter the switch.

The All Blacks use the flat two-man clearing pod to get faster width, with TJ Perenara (9) feeding Sonny Bill Williams directly out behind.

Williams (12) tries to play Barrett (15) behind Taylor on a screen pass, but it doesn’t come together well enough and Pollard (10) makes a good read, rushing up to force Barrett back inside and shuts down the play.

Faf de Klerk also has Rieko Ioane covered on the outside and the All Blacks are unable to create an overlap to exploit.

The ‘comms’ from Lukhanyo Am is an integral part of the Springboks ability to shut this down effectively, seen below at the bottom right of the screen.

Last week against Argentina we saw the All Blacks move completely away from a commonly used 1-3-3-1 pod system, using a two-man clearing pod to move the ball away from the high-pressure zone closest to the ruck.

It was the frequency with which they used this system, one which they have used before, that surprised. The All Blacks used it close to 100% of the time in a massive change geared towards creating more free-flowing rugby.

They continued with that approach against the Springboks but the visitors came prepared using subtle changes to combat it.

Workhorse flanker and unsung hero of last year’s win, Pieter-Steph Du Toit, was often found patrolling the midfield channel, rather than in close next to the ruck.

As the All Blacks flushed the ball past the first clearout pod, Du Toit was able to bring pressure from the middle consistently without fail.

He was constantly up in the face of the attack, forcing the play back inside at times as passing lanes were blocked.

The Springboks successfully prevented the All Blacks getting the ball past the rush defence in the middle third to the open space wider.

When it did, it often became static ball due to the work of players like Jesse Kriel and Cheslin Kolbe jamming in hard to pressure players receiving offloads.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B0dt-mgIyz_/

Late in the second half, they started to drop off under fatigue as the All Blacks’ play started to make in-roads, but they were still able to hold on.

Kieran Read respected the Boks enough to take points on offer, instead of testing them with the driving maul which worked well in both tests last year.

The Springboks aggressive defence looked much more assured this time round, which in the end delivered a historically good output. The 16 points scored is the third-lowest at home under Steve Hansen’s watch, and the sixth-lowest considering away tests as well.

This should please Rassie Erasmus as he knows that pressure-cooker World Cup games aren’t going to be decided by tries and a smart, hard-working defensive unit can be the cornerstone of a championship side.

His side is still on the up and making rapid improvements towards becoming one.

Jordie Barrett expected to re-sign with NZR:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The era-defining moment that set Leinster on the road to success The era-defining moment that set Leinster on the road to success
Search