Northern | US

World Rugby to ensure balanced pools at '27 World Cup with later draw


Antoine Dupont of France and Ireland's Johnny Sexton (Photo by Harry Murphy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)
Comments
1 Comment

World Rugby has acknowledged the pools for the upcoming Rugby World Cup are not as balanced as they could be and have expressed their intention to address this for the 2027 tournament in Australia.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pools were drawn on December 9 2020, a lot has changed since that date. The top 12 teams from across the globe had automatically qualified by finishing in the top three of their pool at the 2019 Rugby World Cup and were then split into 3 “bands”.

Band one comprised of the top four ranked sides in the world; South Africa, New Zealand, England and Wales.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Band two comprised of the next best four; Ireland, Australia, France and Japan.

Band three comprised of the best teams to miss the quarter-finals in 2019; Scotland, Argentina, Fiji and Italy.

Each band was randomly split into the four pools along with the qualifiers, who were yet to be established.

This method ensured the top four ranked sides at that time were separated at the pool stages but fast forward to the present day and two nations from band two currently occupy the top seeding in the world rankings.

This has left the top four ranked teams in World Rugby, who would consequently be considered the favourites for the tournament, likely facing each other in the quarter-finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The reason why the pool draws were made early was because of assurity of the host cities and the hosts, knowing where teams are going, which is very important obviously for a tournament,” World Rugby Chairman Sir Bill Beaumont told The Breakdown.

“But what we will be looking at doing, we will be looking at having the pool draw as late as possible so that you can get more consistent around the balance in a pool.

“There’s always going to be one pool that is tougher than the others. I speak from experience of chairing a host country that didn’t get beyond the quarter-finals in 2015. So, I know exactly what it’s like to be sitting around that table and looking at a pool draw.

“We will be looking to see how late, when we go to Australia, that we can make the pool draw.”

No further details have been confirmed on how late that pool draw will be made but as Sir Bill Beaumont mentioned, organising host cities as well as fan experiences require the decisions be made some time in advance.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

D
Drew 28 minutes ago
'The phoney war on the Greatest Rivalry tour is already gale-force in its intensity.'

The SA v Argentina game had more than 40min ball in play, so if thats the metric SA are doing pretty well. I take issue with all of the people who claim that Kiwi style “attacking rugby” is the only way forward and that refs must be harsh on slowing the ball down. Do you mean to suggest that the ABs don’t try to slow opposition ball down at ruck time? Of course they do. All teams do. Do you think South Africa really wants slow rucks? No we dont. We also know that quick ball creates openings. Its rugby 101. We just think that fast rucks is not the single and only important aspect of rugby and that if the ruck is already slow theres nothing wrong with taking a few extra seconds to setup for a good tactical kick or exit. There are also scrums, mauls, lineouts, tactical kicking, side steps and passing etc that are important. We also like to attack whether we have the ball or dont have the ball. Does that make us negative? I don’t think so. Our fast line speed and aggressive defence is a great weapon and a great thing to watch. It actually creates opportunities for high skill teams like NZ which makes for an intriguing contest. Its also funny that the people who call SA rugby negative and want us penalized for competing in the air, saying we are not really trying to catch it, and who want us to not get penalties from collapsed scrums, are the same people who complained that if we maul it over the line and its held up they should get a “get out of jail” dropout instead of having to go to another “boring” defensive scrum, the same people that complained that just because they were going backwards in the maul, if it collapsed and the ball doesn’t come out they should get the put in, the same people who complained that we shouldn’t be allowed to scrum from a free kick, and that failed attempted intercepts should be yellow cards. You are the people that are responsible for some of the most ridiculous laws in our game and the hours of TMO time wasted reviewing whether a knock on was “deliberate”, something that is impossible to impartially determine unless you can read minds. So before you complain about some aspect of the game in which you are inferior, rethink what you are wishing for, because it might just turn rugby union into rugby league. Honestly I think Dave Rennie would like that. The All Black style seems to be a lot like league.

185 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close