Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Erasmus says Springboks are 'desperate' to make Lions tour happen

Springboks director of rugby Rassie Erasmus.

Springboks director of rugby Rassie Erasmus says they will “do anything” to play the British and Irish Lions amid ongoing uncertainty surrounding the scheduled summer tour. The Lions are due to tour South Africa in July and August but it looks increasingly unlikely that the tour can go ahead as originally planned due to the current situation in the country, which has been hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic.

ADVERTISEMENT

A number of contingency plans have been floated, including the prospects of delaying the tour by a year or holding the games this summer in the UK and Ireland, where the vaccination process is at a more advanced stage.

And Erasmus says they are open to anything when in comes to making the tour happen, adding that the decision to withdraw from the 2020 Rugby Championship was made with one eye on the visit of the Lions.

Video Spacer

RugbyPass OFFLOAD | Episode 12 | Refs Call – former pro ref JP Doyle joins the panel.

Video Spacer

RugbyPass OFFLOAD | Episode 12 | Refs Call – former pro ref JP Doyle joins the panel.

“We desperately want to play the Lions, and we will do anything to play them,” he said.

“This series only comes around every 12 years. I have heard the different calls and opinions about the tour, and although we didn’t play in the Rugby Championship because of player welfare, it was also because we knew there was this big series in 2021.

“If option one of playing in South Africa doesn’t work out, we will go to option Z to make it happen. We don’t want to lose [out on playing] the Lions series, we feel we deserve to play against them.

“I want to, Jacques [Nienaber] wants to, the players want to, so from our side we’ll do anything.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks haven’t played any Test rugby since winning the 2019 Rugby World Cup.

“The frustration is unbelievable [that the Boks haven’t been able to play since the World Cup], but we know we can’t compare that to how devastating the impact of this pandemic has been, and how people have suffered,” Erasmus added.

“But, yes, we will explore any option to play the Lions, we will play next year, we will play over there. This is the view from a player and management perspective.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 1 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

11 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good an Irish side' Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good'
Search