Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'This is not an excuse, but it's the reality': New Italy boss Quesada

By Josh Raisey
Gonzalo Quesada head coach of Italy looks on during the Guinness Six Nations 2024 match between Italy and England at Stadio Olimpico on February 03, 2024 in Rome, Italy. (Photo by Emmanuele Ciancaglini/Ciancaphoto Studio/Getty Images)

Gonzalo Quesada has said he is “completely confident” in his side after his first game as Italy’s head coach.

ADVERTISEMENT

Italy fell to their narrowest ever defeat to England at the Stadio Olimpico in Rome in round one of the Guinness Six Nations, and while it was encouraging for the Azzurri, it did highlight areas the Argentinian needs to work on ahead of a trip to Dublin next week.

The former Stade Francais boss was not interested in making excuses after the 27-24, but was looking at positives, one of which was the fact that he will have more time to work with the team and prepare for their upcoming games.

Speaking after the match, he described the limited amount of time he had with his squad leading into the Six Nations, which put Italy on the back foot as they are the only team with a new head coach.

While Quesada conceded the challenge is going to get much harder next week when Italy play Ireland at the Aviva Stadium fresh from a resounding victory over France, he said it is not negotiable that his side seek to play better rugby than they did against England.

Match Summary

1
Penalty Goals
5
3
Tries
2
3
Conversions
1
0
Drop Goals
0
98
Carries
119
6
Line Breaks
4
11
Turnovers Lost
10
4
Turnovers Won
4

“The only thing which is for me not negotiable is that we want to be better,” the Italy boss said after the match.

“We want to play better rugby than we did today. Because we know that we can be better.

“This is not an excuse, but it’s the reality- we prepared for the game with basically two training sessions last week and just one more week of preparation leading into this afternoon.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We now know much better where to focus next week and definitely the first goal is to improve as we are going to play in a much tougher environment in Dublin against an Ireland team that scored 40 points against France.

“England made us play their game, the game they wanted in the second-half, but apart from that, I’m completely confident in the team after today’s game.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 11 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING What the 'Cry Boks' say about the modern South African male What the 'Cry Boks' say about the modern South African male
Search