Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The remarkable metre per second speed 6'4, 18 stone Cokanasiga clocked in training

By Ian Cameron
Cokanasiga in action for Bath (Getty Images)

It’s been a big weekend for ‘Big Joe’ Cokanasiga.

His man of the match display against Italy saw former England head coach Sir Clive Woodward inevitably liken him to Jonah Lomu. Comparing any outsized wingers to the New Zealand great is one of rugby’s most well-trodden clichés, and one Eddie Jones was quick to dismiss.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That’s ridiculous,” said Jones. “That tells you why when you have the television on you should have the commentary down.”

That said, the physical similarities are plain to see. Like Lomu, Cokanasiga stands 6’4 and tips the scales at 18 stone. Yet size as a winger is useless if you don’t have the athleticism to go with it – and Cokanasiga has that in spades.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

The Fijian born wing – full name Ratu Josateki Tuivanuavou Waqanivalu Cokanasiga – has clocked over 10 metres a second over 50m in training at Bath. Since arriving last summer he has officially become the fastest player on the books at the club – faster than England flyers Anthony Watson and Jonathan Joeseph.

For comparison, Ireland’s fastest international player – Jacob Stockdale – has been clocked at 9.97 mps.

England’s fastest player – Jonny May – was clocked in 2017 at 10.49 metres per second in a 40-metre speed test. While there are no metres per second times for the pre-GPS Lomu – the 18 stone plus All Black was reputed to run the 100 metres in a time of 10.8 seconds (although that a number that has not been verified).

Fellow speedster May has been suitably impressed by Big Joe.

“Joe is very gifted athletically and he’s also a huge bloke. He’s strong and very, very fast. He has got the world at his feet, really,” May said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“For a winger, that athletic ability is huge and then on top of that you’ve got to build your smartness and your game understanding. He’s continuing to do that.

“He’s getting better, he’s learning and he’s added to the group. He has earned his opportunity this week and I’m sure he’s going to have a pretty decent game.

“I haven’t known Joe that long but he’s quite quiet. He has a little bit of cheekiness about him – he has got a cheeky grin on his face.

“He is quite a reserved guy but he is starting to open up a little bit more. We might have a game of pool with him, or a game of darts, and have a laugh.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 6 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

19 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING New Zealand U20 score in dying minutes to draw with South Africa U20 New Zealand U20 and South Africa U20 draw
Search