Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The Ireland verdict on clinical reaction to 'last chance saloon'

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Paarl in the Thursday mud was a cauldron of raw emotion, agony and ecstasy shared out across all three compelling Junior World Championship fixtures. The neighbouring Italy and France were the pair that celebrated jubilantly later in the day, thrilled that they had seen off the respective challenges of host nation South Africa and New Zealand.

ADVERTISEMENT

Around lunchtime, however, it was Irish eyes who were sparkling in the rain, Richie Murphy’s Six Nations Grand Slam champions delivering an impressive pick-and-go performance to suffocate the Junior Wallabies who had initially thought it would their day when they found themselves leading 10-3 after a brilliantly taken support play try from deep.

The Ireland reaction to finding themselves with backs to the wall was class. Having drawn their opening match with England, the Irish knew that another winless outing would extinguish their World Cup hopes and there was not a hint of nervousness as they battled to lead 11-10 at the break and then going to win 30-10 with a four-try bonus point also secured.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

It leaves them behind leaders England on points difference heading into Super Tuesday where the Ireland versus Fiji match in Stellenbosch (not Paarl as originally planned) will be followed by the English playing Australia in Athlone to determine exactly who progresses as the Pool B winners. Murphy is thrilled that his team is nicely poised.

“Definitely, we are in control of our own destiny at this stage,” he enthused to RugbyPass. “Getting the bonus point last week, getting the bonus point this week, eight points after two games – we are reasonably happy with that.

“England are a really good side but the lads, when they looked back to the England game (that was drawn 34-all), they were a little bit disappointed with how they played and we showed them some opportunities that we missed, so we knew it was last chance saloon against Australia.

“We had to step up and they did that really well. The atmosphere they brought all week, their tightness and their connections they have built within the group, are really strong. You could see that towards the end of the game where they kept at it until they got that fourth try.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m absolutely thrilled. It was an incredibly tough day to play rugby. Pitches around this place are completely under water. Even trying to find an area to do your warm-up was really difficult.

“The main pitch held up pretty well but it was unbelievably heavy, so I thought we managed the game really well in the second half playing ball into the corners and getting the pressure on.

“Our scrum was really strong and our maul dominant. Rugby games have to be won in many different ways; we just had to roll our sleeves up and we managed to do that.”

Who especially stood out for the coach? “I thought Ruadhan (Quinn) was very impressive in his carrying. I thought Charlie Irvine, for a guy who didn’t play with us in the Six Nations, really stepped up. Paddy McCarthy was just phenomenal in these conditions; his engine is incredible.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In general, all the boys have done really well,” he added before making particular reference to his half-backs, including Sam Prendergast whose two-from-six return off the kicking tee hurt in the England draw.

“I thought our half-backs managed the game really well as well. Like all top players, they will bounce back. They might have an off day and Sam will say that he was a little bit off last week, but he bounced back really well, showed the confidence to get in there and take the kicks as well. Fintan (Gunne) had another fine game, a very tough, nuggetty nine who kicked really well as well did a great job for us.”

Related

The only downer for Ireland was a second successive match where they picked up a red card. Last Saturday it was Hugh Cooney who was sent off, his foul tackle play getting punished with a three-game ban that will be reduced to two if tackle school is successfully completed.

On Thursday, it was replacement midfielder Rory Telfer who saw red, his originally yellow-carded tackle getting upgraded following further review by the TMO bunker.

It also emerged that back row James McNabney was cited and both players were banned on Saturday for three matches, sanctions that can be cut to two via tackle school.

“That makes it a little bit tight, we will have to have a look and see,” explained Murphy about the Telfer incident, a time when the coach was unaware of anything untoward involving McNabney.

“It was upgraded to a red, so we need to go back and have a look. It’s very hard to say. We only brought 13 backs out here, we are down to 11 now if that is the case so we are pretty tight.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

W
Wayneo 4 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

Some interesting stats that just proved what my first impression of NZ’s drive to speed up Rugby Union would amount to - fine margins here and there to cut a few seconds off the game and nothing else. To do more there would have to be wholesale changes to the game like doing away with scrums, lineouts and bringing back the ELV’s to have free kicks instead of penalties. Very little chance of it happening but, in the end, Ruby Union would be a 15-man version of Rugby League. There are reasons why Rugby Union is globally more popular that Rugby League and what NZ are also not considering is the unintended consequences of what they want to achieve. This will end up turning Rugby Union into a low value product that will not be acceptable to the paying public. If people really wanted a sped-up version of rugby, then why is Rugby Union globally way more popular than Rugby League? Rugby lovers all over the world are also not stupid and have seen through what NZ are trying to achieve here, selfishly to bring back their glory days of dominance over every other nation and compete with Rugby League that is dominant in Australasia. NH countries just don’t have the cattle, or the fantastic weather needed to play like NZ SR franchises do so good luck to whoever has to try and convince the NH to accept going back to the days of NZ dominance and agreeing to wreck the game in the process. I have serious doubts on the validity of the TV stats presented by GP. All they did was expand the broadcasting base by putting it on free to air, not even any indication of arresting the continued drop in viewership. Match day attendance goes hand in hand with broadcast ratings so if there was an increase in the one you should expect to see it with the other. However, the drop in match day attendance is very evident to the casual highlights package viewer. The only club who looks to be getting solid attendance is the Drua. I am calling it now that NZ’s quest to speed up the game will fail and so will the vote on the 20-minute red card.

20 Go to comments
S
Sam T 5 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

All of these media pundits always miss the obvious whenever they analyse what is ailing or assisting the game. Rugby always has contentious points for debate when picking apart individual games and finding fault with itself. All this focus and scrutiny on “speeding up the game”, “high ball in play” etc is all contextual to the fan. As a tv viewer, if you’re absorbed into a game, regardless if your team is playing or not, more ball in play time and action are all byproducts of the contest. A good contest subliminally affects your memory in selectively remembering all the good aspects. A poor contest and your brain has switched off because its a blowout and the result is never in doubt or it’s a real chore to watch and remain engaged throughout. The URC, Top 14 and English premiership are all competitions that feel like there’s real jeopardy each week. The dominance of Super rugby by NZ teams was unhealthy from a sustainable interest perspective. You can’t fault those teams or the players, but the lack of competitions won by SA and Australian teams long term was always going to test the faith and patience of die-hard and casual fans from those regions. SANZAR took their eye off the fans and fans voted with their feet and subscriptions. They were so concerned about expanding their product they forgot the golden rule about broadcasting live sport. Viewers tune in more when there’s an atmosphere and a true contest. You need to fill stadiums to create one, host unions need to do more to service ticket buyers, and this year proves the other, there’s more interest in Super rugby this year only because more games are competitive with less foregone conclusions. All these micro statistics bandied about, only interest the bean counters and trainspotters.

20 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 11 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

20 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Why two All Blacks coaches attended New Zealand U20 match in Australia Why two All Blacks coaches attended New Zealand U20 match in Australia
Search