Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Live blog: Junior World Championship in South Africa – day two

Ireland celebrate a try in Paarl versus Australia (Photo by World Rugby via Getty Images)

It’s day two at the 2023 Junior World Championship and another cracking fixtures list is in store with six more matches set to be played across two venues in South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rugby fans in Paarl will be especially spoiled by what is in store at the local school ground as Thursday’s schedule kicks off with the mouth-watering meeting of Ireland, the current U20s Six Nations champions, versus Australia.

Next on the list is the clash of France, the title holders from 2019, and New Zealand, the tournament’s most frequent title winners, and the feast of Paarl action concludes with the hosts South Africa tackling Italy.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Meanwhile, down the road in Stellenbosch, the activity begins with Wales taking on Japan followed by Argentina against Georgia and round two will then be concluded by England facing Fiji.

It’s a bumper programme of age-grade entertainment and you can follow how it all unfolds on the RugbyPass live blog:

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
A
Adam 522 days ago

What is going on with the grounds they are playing on. What a disgrace being its an international world cup. They look like club grounds with no drainage. Hard for the players to show any skill. Really suits the Northern Hemisphere teams

J
Jérémie 522 days ago

I hope SA will do better if they ever host such a competition again. To play three games, the same day, on such a terrible pitch... Shame.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 49 minutes ago
'Welsh regional rugby has failed conclusively and there is no way back'

Thanks for sharing the little juicy news you don't get on sites like this!


I think defenses are certainly better constructed to deal with it, but did you feel that it had tried to evolve with the new defense? Perhaps that's too difficult without the source of that IP, Lancaster, available? Case in point NZ succesfully nullifying it I thought at the time, but now I think looking back to your game v SA, and it's more direct and collision based approached, I wonder if you really were trying to play in that quarter final like you did against NZ in 21/22. Had the transition away already started?


IDK it might just be rose tinted glasses but without watching Ireland game by game they just now longer have the timing or speed (sorry if I'm repeating stuff that you're replying to I can't remember what I wrote) in how they move the ball sideways that I liked. I remember them moving the ball so fast to the other side of the field, that was flooded with loosies, that they could simply overwhelm with numbers and plays smart enough to pass to the one unmarked player.


I saw some nice prescribed 'plays' against SA that require a similar sort of execution but they were just different and less frequent imo. I still feel the level of play during that good run should be good enough to beat even defences that have worked it out. Look I was relieved that it wasn't coming out against us in France tbh, and I may just not be appreciating how we developed a D to fully snuffle it out, but even if that's the case I still think Ireland would be doing very well to accept that it's good enough to be just out of reach against sides like NZ. Certainly, and this is even before the NZ game last month and you having beaten SA, that what Farrell is producing is not going to be good enough to even be close to the NZ and SA.


You can't knock him for trying of course, it's just with a bit of regret here. Yes, I agree fully with that last paragraph, I'm not just talking this Autumn series mind you. What I ultimately thought the difference was, was just a lack of prep in the same areas they used to prep, and that might mostly be with the Leinster contingent, in that team. Thats not a idea bsed on a change of coach there, just decision by coachs that, yep, weve reach maximum precision with the team moving the ball, lets work on something else. Not that they obviously read this sort of thing but thats the main message ive been trying to implore on your team, that your success was down to this one facet (speaking with a perspective from a country who's whole success has been a DNA of continous link based team rugby) of play and you need to try and get back to it.

173 Go to comments
A
AM 1 hour ago
Will Joe Schmidt provide the Christmas gift Australian fans crave?

It would be better for Schmidt to go. He is a good tactician but he lacks the strategic sense of someone like Rassie. The blueprint is there. Select from OS clubs, form good relationships with OS clubs to ensure players are available and start the season later in Australia to be more aligned with Europe.


The money and standard of coaching is much higher in France, the URC and the Prem so utilise them.


The business model question has been decided and SA has shown selecting OS wins.


Also by not selecting OS players Schmidt is going to grind to dust key guys like Bell. Cf Rassie using more than 50 players in his squad.


He has a tendency to select undersized players as well eg Amatesero who may well leave for France due to Schmidts poor selection like Meafou who is playing so well for France.


The scrum is the worst element yet Schmidt didn’t select Sio or Ainsley both playing well in England and France. He’s also not taken up development and gotten under utilised guys like Pone over to France to get better coaching. Hooker you have Latu and Uelese fit again. Backs you have Kerevi, Hodge, Perese and Kerr Barlow. Locks you have guys like Philip and Arnold.


Would all of these guys be first choice. No but you keep them in the squad for injuries and so that you don’t kill your first choice guys.


Get Jacques Nienaber or someone like that who understands strategic elements of the game better.

6 Go to comments
B
Bruiser 2 hours ago
Scott Hansen: How the All Blacks are building for the 2027 World Cup

Have to agree with comments below on lack of progress in attack. Our forwards are well and truly on target to providing a platform that can win an RWC. Our attack has been average for years now. We showed some glimpses against France of looking like the ABs, so lets give it time. Roigard is a key man...his physicality and athleticism will ensure we get the quick recycled ball we need, not to mention his exorcet boot. Ten is the big issue. I'm a big fan of BB and Mac, but I think they are both part of our super impact bench. RM would be part of the puzzle...was never a super fan, but after many years he gradually arrived a proper test 10 and I think he would play his best footie if you gave him another 3 years until 2027. Breaking up 12/13 would be a mistake. You need muscle in midfield more than anything now. Havilli got tossed around like a rag doll. SA would lick their lips at not having Jordie and Reiko there...they are defensive rocks. Reiko possibly best defensive 13 in world rugby. We got smashed the moment he wasnt there against Argentina. Proctor got thrown around against Japan...would be manhandled by boks. We need a Riley Higgens to come into the enviroment now, to start to understand the where the bar is set. Reiko also gives us the luxury of not having wing cover on the bench, if Jordan is at 15. Caleb is a lock down, but the other wing is up for grabs. Talea has been a match winner, but worry about his lack of pace. But back to Hansen, the jury is still def out, but lets give him next season to find the answers.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Caelan Doris lets slip Ireland admission as Andy Farrell heads to exit 'Other teams are getting better': Caelan Doris concedes Ireland must e
Search