Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Angry' Shaun Edwards riled over reporter's question at Murrayfield

By PA
France's English defence coach Shaun Edwards (L) speaks next to France's number 8 Gregory Alldritt during a press conference at Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh, Scotland on February 9, 2024 on the eve of their Six Nations international rugby union match against Scotland. (Photo by Andy Buchanan / AFP) (Photo by ANDY BUCHANAN/AFP via Getty Images)

Prickly Shaun Edwards bristled at suggestions France have become a soft touch after conceding nine tries in their last two matches.

ADVERTISEMENT

Les Bleus shipped five tries as they were destroyed by Ireland in last Friday’s Six Nations opener in Marseille, their first match since losing four in an agonising 29-28 World Cup quarter-final defeat in Paris in October.

Speaking ahead of Saturday’s showdown with Scotland, the defence coach Edwards was in a tetchy mood when grilled about their leakiness at Friday’s press conference at Murrayfield.

Video Spacer

Referee Angus Gardner on his unique shadow preparation – Whistleblowers | RPTV

In this snippet from the exclusive Whistleblowers documentary on the lives of referees, Angus Gardner goes through his routine, explaining how he likes to get his mind right for matches. Watch the full documentary on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Referee Angus Gardner on his unique shadow preparation – Whistleblowers | RPTV

In this snippet from the exclusive Whistleblowers documentary on the lives of referees, Angus Gardner goes through his routine, explaining how he likes to get his mind right for matches. Watch the full documentary on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

“We had the best defence at the World Cup,” he retorted bluntly, appearing to have taken offence at the question.

When it was put to him that he seemed angry, Englishman Edwards – who has been part of the France set-up since November 2019 – responded: “I am normally angry when we lose. It means a lot to me and I know how much it means to the people of France, the France supporters.

“In the last four years we have a 75 per cent win ratio, 80 per cent sometimes. It (the Ireland game) is the only time I feel we did not perform anywhere near the level we normally do.”

Edwards is confident there will be a positive French response at Murrayfield.

“We haven’t played so poorly in the last four years,” he said. “As I said, that was our one really poor performance against one of the top two teams in the world, but we’re here to improve tomorrow and we can’t wait for the game to begin.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We need to give a better account of ourselves in attack, defence, our kicking game, the set-piece. We know we’re up against a formidable opponent in Scotland, who have been ranked in the top five in the last 12 months.

“We know we’re in for a tough game but we just want to give a better account of ourselves and obviously a victory would be nice as well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 5 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

16 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.' Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.'
Search