Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Those conversations never really sit still': What future holds for Super Rugby

By Tom Vinicombe
Richie Mo'unga. (Photo by Andrew Cornaga/Photosport)

New Zealand Rugby and Rugby Australia have agreed to a long-term joint venture between the unions which ties the two trans-Tasman neighbours together for the next eight years.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Friday, the two unions announced a new governance model for Super Rugby Pacific, with the establishment of a nine-person board featuring representatives from both sides of the Tasman. The Board will oversee the competition with the purpose of a clear, unbiased focus on governance, and the creation of a consistent look and feel across the competition.

While the CEOs of both RA and NZR affirmed that there would be no changes to the competition structure just yet, Mark Robinson indicated to media that changes could still come in the future.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“The position is that it’s a round-robin with the same play-off format that we have now until otherwise mutually agreed by both parties,” he said. We think that it’s a really strong format; however, if in the future there is real appetite from commercial broadcast partners and fans to want to look at that format, then that’ll be something that we can look at.

“But to give stability to the competition, it is the format that’s been agreed until otherwise agreed otherwise. That is locked in because it would be a reasonably significant piece of work and then a lot of strong alignment and agreement to otherwise change that.”

Robinson also addressed the possibility of bringing in further sides from outside Australasia to complement the current 12 teams.

“Expansion teams would have to be something that both JV partners agree to and work obviously for the clubs and the national unions and the players,” he said. “So that’s a wider sort of medium-to-long-term conversation.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Those conversations never really sit still or die. There’s constant conversations with Japan, especially, out of Asia and the Americas as it relates to Super Rugby in the future or professional rugby opportunities to work together so that’s something that although we can’t commit to what it might mean for expansion, they are always conversations that are sitting there.”

While it wasn’t always smooth sailing in the conversations between RA and NZR – with the former, in particular, going public with many of their expectations, Robinson said the desire from both parties ultimately got the core deal over the line and that other issues would be settled upon by the board.

“In a process like this with a lot of negotiation for a long term, which is complex, has lots of different stakeholders and partners involved with it, there’s often a very wide and long list at the start and then it narrows down, as you can imagine, near the end of that,” Robinson said. “And I think towards the end really there was obviously conversations – and they’re are no different to what was in public – around commercial value and creating a fair and equitable split around value.

Related

“And then there are issues where possibly both unions were at different stages around things like format, player transfers, player eligibility, drafts, salary caps, where, in a lot of instances, it’s too soon to get too involved in detail around a lot of those competition mechanisms to slow us down unnecessarily at this time. So some of those things have been parked and they’ll be picked up by the JV board and national union where appropriate in due course.”

ADVERTISEMENT

While NZ and Australia both have strict selection policies for their national sides, it’s been mooted that those laws could be relaxed to allow, for example, any New Zealand playing in Super Rugby to be eligible for the All Blacks, even if they represent an Australian club. As noted by Robinson, however, such changes can be addressed as a later date, now that an agreement has been reached.

Super Rugby Pacific will kick off on February 24 next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 4 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

16 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search