Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

La Rochelle to take backs and forwards size difference to the extreme

By Ian Cameron
La Rochelle embrace diversity of size across positions

A prevailing narrative in professional rugby is that of the ever-increasing size of players, and furthermore, that players’ body shapes are becoming more uniform across positions.

ADVERTISEMENT

With Law changes and various styles in which the game is played, some believe that the utility of specialist physiques is in decline, and that Union runs the risk of eventually mirroring Rugby League, where players’ physiques are more uniform.

The idea of a ‘game for all shapes and sizes’ is under threat, or so this cliché goes.

At least one team bucking this trend is La Rochelle on the West coast of France. The club have embraced specialisation or at the very least that most fundamental rugby axiom: select big forwards and small backs.

Video Spacer

A cursory glance at their 2018/19 squad and new signings ahead of the season show that Europe’s newest rugby superpower favour physical diversity. New inclusions – backrow Lopeti Timani (6’4″, 124kg) and winger Marc Andreu (5’7″, 75kg) – being a case in point.

It’s a phenomenon that is borne out across the team. The average weight of a La Rochelle player is 104.6kg or 16 stone 7Ibs and their average height is 185.5cm or 6’1″.

The forwards however weigh in at a whopping 117.9kg or 18 stone 8Ibs a man and a height of 190.5cm or 6’3″ even.

In stark contrast, the backs are positively minuscule at just 86.9kg or 13 stone 10 Ibs; and 179cm or 5’10.5″ in height, making them most likely the smallest back division in Europe.

ADVERTISEMENT

Furthermore, that makes their average forward 4.5 inches taller and a staggering 31kg heavier than their backs – a smidge under 5 stone heavier on average per man.

What’s also remarkable is just how few players approximate the average player weight – just 4 players out of 35 are within three kilos either side of 104.6kg, with the majority of players are clustered at the further reaches of the size differential.

Their heaviest player – French tighthead Uini Atonio (152kg) – remarkably weighs twice as much as newly signed wing Marc Andreau (75kg).

Whether this size difference is a function of the how the Top14 is played, with an emphasis on the set piece and mauling, or if it is by design is hard to tell. Whatever the underlying cause, the evidence suggests that at La Rochelle, it’s still very much a game for ‘all shapes and sizes’.

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 11 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Chaos': Lawes sheds light on the social that ended 2 England careers 'Chaos': Lawes sheds light on the social that ended 2 England careers
Search